Article published In: Popular News Discourse: American and British newspapers 1833-1988
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:2] 2014
► pp. 314–330
Popular newspaper discourse
The case of UK TV criticism from the 1950s to the 1980s
Published online: 21 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.2.08rix
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.2.08rix
Journalistic discourse, the world over, has developed over time, reflecting changes in the news industry and the wider society. Likewise television criticism, a specific form of journalism, has also had to evolve over time. Initially, as television critics sought recognition and respectability in the quality newspapers, they developed a form of writing similar to the way other forms of culture and art were reviewed. However, as journalists began to develop more popular ways of writing, and with the spread of soft news throughout newspapers and into new magazine supplements, television critics also found themselves having to follow suit. This was such that by the 1970s a number of critics had moved away from trying to mimic other forms of reviewing or criticism to creating their own, more popular form of discourse. In this article I will explore some of the ways the language of critics changed between the 1950s and the 1980s, and how these developments were similar or different to the wider changes in journalism happening at this time.
Keywords: popular journalism, television criticism, critics, television critics
References (50)
Biressi, Anita, and Heather Nunn (eds.). 2008. The Tabloid Culture Reader. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Briggs, Asa. 1995. The History of Broadcasting in the United Kingdom: Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curran, James, and Jean Seaton. 2010. Power without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
Gander, Leonard Marsland. 1954a. “Light Brigade Charges Again.” Daily Telegraph. 20 April. London, 8.
Gripsrud, Jostein. 2008. “Tabloidization, Popular Journalism, and Democracy.” In The Tabloid Culture Reader, ed. by Anita Biressi, and Heather Nunn, 34–44. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hazard, Patrick (ed.). 1966. TV as Art: Some Essays in Criticism. Illinois: National Council of Teachers.
LeMahieu, Dan. 1988. A Culture for Democracy: Mass Communication and the Cultivated Mind in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McArthur, Colin. 1980. “Point of Review: Television Criticism in the Press.” Screen Education 35 (Summer): 59–61.
Ornebring, Henrik, and Anna Maria Jonsson. 2008. “Tabloid Journalism and the Public Sphere: A Historical Perspective on Tabloid Journalism.” In The Tabloid Culture Reader, ed. by Anita Biressi, and Heather Nunn, 23–33. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Petley, Julian. 1997. “Faces for Spaces.” In A Journalism Reader, ed. by Michael Bromley, and Tom O’Malley, 251–272. London and New York: Routledge.
Poole, Mike. 1984. “The Cult of the Generalist: British Television Criticism 1936–83.” Screen 25 (2): 41–61.
. 1994. “Lowering the Box.” Guardian
. 4 April. London, 12.
Purser, Phillip. 1992. Done Viewing: A Personal Account of the Best Years of Our Television. London: Quarter Books.
Rixon, Paul. 2011. TV Critics and Popular Culture: A History of British Television Criticism. London: I.B. Taurus.
Shayon, Robert Lewis (ed.). 1962. The Eighth Art: Twenty-Three Views of Television Today. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sparks, Colin. 1992. “Popular Journalism: Theories and Practice.” In Journalism and Popular Culture, ed. by Peter Dahlgren, and Colin Sparks, 24–44. London: Sage.
The Times. 1975. “Last’s Nights TV.” 25 April. London, 13.
Thumim, Janet. 2004. Inventing Television Culture: Men, Women, and the Box. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Kevin. 2010a. Get Me a Murder a Day! A History of Media and Communication in Britain. London: Bloomsbury.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
From, Unni
Rixon, Paul
Toolan, Michael
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
