Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.93–122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Continuity and quantity

Testing iconicity hypotheses on the continuities of time and participants in Old English narrative prose

 | Åbo Akademi University
Published online: 28 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.05war
Givón’s (1995) quantity principle about the diagrammatic iconicity of coding forms has mostly been investigated for topic continuity and nominal elements. The present paper considers its applicability both to participant continuity and the continuity of time, focussing on their interaction in the organisation of narrative discourse. As an additional test of the hypothesis, the paper studies historical data, examining the structuring roles of signals of participant and temporal continuities in Old English narrative prose. The findings indicate that the choice of signals of the continuities of time and participants follows the iconic quantity principle of longer and informationally-heavier forms encoding greater degrees of discontinuity. The paper also underlines the importance of text type and genre-specific factors in investigations of discourse-structural signals. Specifically for the Old English narrative data, the study provides further support for the discourse marker role of þa ‘then’ as distinct from other temporal expressions.
References (66)
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London and New York: Routledge.
. 2001. “Accessibility Theory: An Overview.” In Text Representation. Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. by Ted J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperoord, and Wilbert Spooren, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2008. “Verb Types and Word Order in Old and Middle English Non-Coordinate and Coordinate Clauses.” In English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume I1: Syntax and Morphology, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena, and Richard Dury, 49–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benz, Anton, and Peter Kühlein (eds.). 2008. Constraints in Discourse. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 172.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bestgen, Yves, and Wietske Vonk. 2000. “Temporal Adverbials as Segmentation Markers in Discourse Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 42 (1): 74–87. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph, and T. Northcote Toller. 2010. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. Compiled by Sean Christ, and Ondřej Tichý. Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012). [Print version 1954, 1st printing 1898, supplement 1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]
Botley, Simon, and Anthony Mark McEnery (eds.). 2000. Corpus-Based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora. (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 3.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branco, António, Tony McEnery, and Ruslan Mitkov (eds.). 2005. Anaphora Processing. Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1993. “Episode Boundary Markers in Old English Discourse.” In Historical Linguistics 1989. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 106), ed. by Henk Aertsen, and Robert J. Jeffers, 73–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. (Topics in English Linguistics 19.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionary of Old English. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1972. “Old English Adverbial þa - An Action Marker?” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 731: 90–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986. “More about the Textual Functions of Old English Adverbial þa.” In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday. Volume 1: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 32), ed. by Dieter Kastovsky, and Aleksander Szwedek, 301–309. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1987. “Text Strategies: Single, Dual, Multiple.” In Language Topics. Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Volume II1, ed. by Ross Steele, and Terry Threadgold, 203–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik, and Brita Wårvik. 1987. “Old English þa, Temporal Chains, and Narrative Structure.” In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. (Current Issues in Linguistics Theory 48), ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini, 221–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ezzyat, Joussef, and Lila Davachi. 2011. “What Constitutes an Episode in Episodic Memory?” Psychological Science 221: 243–252. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London and New York: Routledge. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, Robert. 1975. “The Use of þa in Old and Middle English Narratives.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 761: 404–414.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 1987. “Anaphora in Popular Written English Narratives.” In Coherence and Grounding. (Typological Studies in Language 11), ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 157–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein. 2006. “English Then and Norwegian da/så Compared: A Relevance-Theoretic Account.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 291: 45–93. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. [1997] 2005. “Narrative.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
Givón, Talmy. 1983. “Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction.” In Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. (Typological Studies in Language 3), ed. by Talmy Givón, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations.” In Iconicity in Language. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 110), ed. by Raffaele Simone, 47–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. (Typological Studies in Language 3.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language 691: 274–307. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho-Dac, Lydia-Mai, and Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley. 2009. “A Data-Driven Study of Temporal Adverbials as Discourse Segmentation Markers.” Discours 41. Special issue on “Linearization and Segmentation in Discourse”. Available at: [URL]. .
Hopper, Paul J. 1979. “Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse.” In Discourse and Syntax. (Syntax and Semantics 12), ed. by Talmy Givón, 213–241. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “A Discourse Perspective on Syntactic Change: Text-Building Strategies in Early Germanic.” In Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 58), ed. by Edgar C. Polomé, and Werner Winter, 217–238. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ji, Shaojun. 2002. “Identifying Episode Transitions.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1257–1271. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “A Textual Perspective on Givón’s Quantity Principle.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 292–304. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “What Do Paragraph Divisions Indicate in Narrative Texts?” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1719–1730. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Taejin. 1992. The Particle þa in the West-Saxon Gospels. A Discourse Level Analysis. (European University Studies, Series XIV: Anglo-SaxonLanguage and Literature 249.) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühnlein, Peter, Anton Benz, and Candace L. Sidner (eds.). 2010. Constraints in Discourse 2. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 194.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experiences.” In Essays on Verbal and Visual Arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1979. “The Paragraph as a Grammatical Unit.” In Discourse and Syntax. (Syntax and Semantics 12), ed. by Talmy Givón, 115–134. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983. The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. “An Apparatus for the Description of Participant Reference in Narrative Discourse.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Congress of Linguists, Berlin/GDR, August 10 – August 15, 1987, ed. by Werner Behner, Joachim Schildt, and Dieter Viehweger, 2175–2175. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., and Nancy S. Johnson. 1977. “Remembrance of Things Parsed: Story Structure and Recall.” Cognitive Psychology 91: 111–151. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory. A Theory of Text Organization. (ISI Research Report ISI/RS-87-190.) Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moya Guijarro, A. Jesús. 2006. “The Continuity of Topic in Journal and Travel Texts.” Functions of Language 131: 37–76. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information Status.” In Discourse Description. Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16), ed. by William C. Mann, and Sandra A. Thompson, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela. 1987. “Introduction of Story Characters in Interactive and Non-interactive Narration.” In The Pragmatic Perspective. Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. (Pragmatics & Beyond Companion Series 5), ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Marcella Bertucelli-Papi, 339–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Linguistics 291: 1139–1172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. “Between Text and Context: Deixis, Anaphora, and the Meaning of Then.” Text 101: 245–270. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Anaphoric Then: Aspectual, Textual, and Epistemic Meaning.” Linguistics 301: 753–792. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz-Friesel, Monika, Manfred Consten, and Marcile Knees (eds.). 2007. Anaphors in Text. Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solin, Anna. 2009. “Genre.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: [URL] (accessed 30 October 2012).
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1971. The History of English Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992a. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English. Clause-Initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992b. “Issues of Text Typology: Narrative - A ‘Basic’ Type of Text?” Text 121: 293–310. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992c. “Given and New Information in Adverbials: Clause-Initial A dverbials of Time and Place.” Journal of Pragmatics 171: 99–115. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Text Structure.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
. 2004. “Point of Departure: Cognitive Aspects of Sentence-Initial Adverbials.” In Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 147), ed. by Tuija Virtanen, 7–97. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Variation across Texts and Discourses: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Text Type and Genre.” In Syntactic Variation and Genre. (Topics in English Lingustics 70), ed. by Heidrun Dorgeloh, 53–84. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Discourse-Level Structuring of Information in Narrative: Signalling Structural, Interactional and Cognitive Shifts.” Discours: Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique 81. Special issue on “Approches fonctionelles de la structuration des textes.” Available at: [URL]. .
Virtanen, Tuija, and Brita Wårvik. 1987. “Observations sur les types de textes.” In 8e Rencontre de Professeurs de Français de l’Enseignement Supérieur. Communications. (Publications du Département des Langues Romanes de Université de Helsinki 6), ed. by Juhani Härmä, and Iris Mäkinen-Schwanck, 91–114. Helsinki: Département des Langues Romanes de l’Université de Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 1987. “On Text Strategies in Old English Narrative Prose.” In CDEF 86. Papers from the Conference of Departments of English in Finland. (Publications of the Department of English, University of Oulu 7), ed. by Heikki Nyyssönen, Riitta Kataja, and Vesa Komulainen, 77–92. Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1996] 2011. “Grounding.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 July 2012).
. 2013. “Peak-Marking Strategies in Old English Narrative Prose.” Style 471: 168–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Participant Continuity and Narrative Structure: Defining Discourse Marker Functions in Old English.” Folia Linguistica Historica 34: 209–242.
Waterhouse, Ruth. 1984. “Sentence Determination in Ælfric’s Lives of Saints.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 851: 257–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue