Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 1:2 (2000) ► pp.201–230
Representations of orality in Early Modern English trial records
Published online: 30 August 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.04kry
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.04kry
The paper aims at answering some questions essential for a historical pragmaticist. It examines to what extent the written records available nowadays reflect the language spoken in the past, i.e. what their degree of orality is. The data are two Early Modern English texts: The trial of Titus Oates and The trial of Lady Alice Lisle. Trial records are relevant for this analysis since they are closer to the original sources than other texts and they are interesting for linguistic reasons, e.g. the formulaic expressions or the discourse strategies used in court. The search for traces of orality is based on two features: turn-taking and closeness to the sociocultural context. The study corroborates my initial hypothesis that the two trial records have preserved many traces of orality. Moreover, they are rich sources of information about the political, social and cultural life of the period.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Moore, Colette
Blomqvist, Oliver
Thomas, Jenelle
Inoue, Miyako
Jucker, Andreas H.
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
Willumsen, Liv Helene
Willumsen, Liv Helene
Grund, Peter
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
2002. Review of Collins (2001): Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical-pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 340 ff.
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
2005. Review of Hiltunen & Watanabe (2004): Approaches to Style and Discourse in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 336 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
