Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
“Pray, Sir, Proceed”
The politeness of requests in epistolary novels of the long eighteenth century
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Zurich.
Published online: 6 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
Abstract
Requests are speech acts that ask somebody to do something that they might not have done without being asked. They
impose on the addressee. In Present-day English, a range of linguistic devices are often used to make this imposition more
palatable, such as questions about the addressee’s willingness or ability to carry out the required action and the use of the
courtesy request marker please. However, this form of non-imposition politeness is relatively recent. In this
paper, I focus on the politeness of requests before the onset of non-imposition politeness (i.e., in the eighteenth century). In
the data consisting of the four-million word Corpus of Long Eighteenth-Century Epistolary Novels (epicol18), polite
requests rely on what I call “supplication politeness” rather than “non-imposition politeness”. They regularly use a format that
includes a performative speech act verb, such as “I beg you…”, “I beseech you…” or “I entreat you…”. The courtesy request marker
of choice was pray, a grammaticalised version of I pray you. Both of these elements frame the
speaker in the role of a supplicant begging the addressee to do something rather than as an advice giver inquiring after the
addressee’s willingness or ability to do it.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Politeness, requests and the eighteenth century
- 3.Data
- 4.Methodology and types of requests
- 5.Performatives
- 6.Courtesy request markers
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (48)
Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. “The
Grammaticalisation of the Verb ‘Pray’”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways
of Change: Grammaticalisation in
English, 67–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baron, Alistair and Paul Rayson. 2008. “VARD
2: A Tool for Dealing with Spelling Variation in Historical
Corpora”. In Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus
Linguistics. 22 May 2008. Birmingham: Aston University.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Juliane House. 1989. “Cross-Cultural
and Situational Variation in Requesting Behavior”. In Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds), Cross-Cultural
Pragmatics: Requests and
Apologies, 123–154. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural
Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Busse, Ulrich. 2002. “Changing
Politeness Strategies in English Requests: A Diachronic
Investigation”. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies
in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio
Oizumi, 17–35. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick. 2010. “Pragmaticalisation
and Discursisation”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical
Pragmatics, 165–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer. 2008. “Requests
and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts,
1640–1760”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-Century
English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual
Self”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 49–81.
Elsweiler, Christine. 2022. “Gender
Variation in the Requestive Behaviour of Early Modern Scottish and English Letterwriters? A Study of Private
Correspondence”. Journal of Historical
Sociolinguistics 8 (1): 55–88.
. 2023. “Modal
May in Requests: A Comparison of Regional Pragmatic Variation in Early Modern Scottish and English
Correspondence”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 25 (3): 355–391.
Faya Cerqueiro, Fátima. 2015. “An
Approach to Parenthetical Courtesy Markers in Requests in Late Modern
English”. In Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman and Mathieu Avanzi (eds), Parenthetical
Verbs, 135–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2017. “Performative
Verbs in Requests: Evidence from Eighteenth-Century Letters”. Cuadernos de Investigación
Filológica 431: 233–248.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 1998. “The
Commerce of Language in the Pursuit of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England”. English
Studies 79 (4): 309–328.
. 2010. “Changes
in the Meaning of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England: Discourse Analysis and Historical
Evidence”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kadar (eds), Historical
(Im)politeness, 87–115. Bern: Peter Lang.
. 2016. “Sincerity
and the Moral Reanalysis of Politeness in Late Modern English: Semantic Change and Contingent
Polysemy”. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore and Miranda Wilcox (eds), Generalizing
vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic
Analysis, 173–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2020. Politeness in the History of English:
From the Middle Ages to the Present
Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2023. “Conduct Politeness versus
Etiquette Politeness: A Terminological Distinction”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language,
Behaviour,
Culture 20 (1): 87–109.
2025. “Das Konzept der
Höflichkeit in England und Deutschland im 18. Jahrhundert in den Werken von Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4. Graf von Chesterfield,
und Adolph Freiherr von Knigge” (‘The Concept of Politeness in
Eighteenth-Century England and Germany in the Works of Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield, and Adolph Freiherr
von Knigge’). In Stephan Elspaß, Hirofumi Hosokawa and Megumi Sato (eds), Sprachgeschichte. Soziolinguistisch, pragmatisch und politisch. Festschrift für Hiroyuki
Takada (‘Historical Linguistics: Sociolinguistic, Pragmatic, and Political. A
Festschrift in Honor of Hiroyuki
Takada’), 187–202. Heidelberg: Winter.
Klauk, Tobias and Tilmann Köppe. 2014. “Bausteine einer Theorie der Fiktionalität” (‘Foundations of a
Theory of Fictionality’). In Tobias Klauk and Tilmann Köppe (eds), Fiktionalität. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (‘Fictionality: An
Interdisciplinary
Handbook’), 3–31. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. “Text
Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act
Analysis”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methodological
Issues in Historical
Pragmatics, 139–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. “Tracing
Directives through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act
Analysis”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. 1998. “Pragmatic
Particles in Early Modern English Tracts”. In Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag
1997 Giessen.
Proceedings, 47–56. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Langford, Paul. 2002. “The
Uses of Eighteenth-Century Politeness”. Transactions of the Royal Historical
Society 121: 311–331.
Locher, Miriam A. and Andreas H. Jucker. 2021. The
Pragmatics of Fiction: Literature, Stage and Screen
Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lutzky, Ursula and Jane Demmen. 2013. “Pray
in Early Modern English Drama”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 14 (2): 263–284.
Marquez Reiter, Rosina. 2000. Linguistic
Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and
Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moessner, Lilo. 2010. “Directive
Speech Acts: A Cross-Generic Diachronic Study”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 11 (2): 219–249.
Nünning, Vera and Ansgar Nünning. 1998. Englische Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts (‘English Literature of the
Eighteenth
Century’). Stuttgart: Klett.
Oxford English Dictionary. See: [URL]
Schneider, Klaus P. 2017. “Is That a Threat? Forms and
Functions of Metapragmatic Terms in English Discourse”. AAA — Arbeiten aus Anglistik und
Amerikanistik 42 (2): 225–242.
2022. “Referring to Speech Acts in
Communication: Exploring Meta-Illocutionary Expressions in ICE-Ireland”. Corpus
Pragmatics 61: 155–174.
Schoppa, Dominik Jan. 2022. “Conceptualizing Illocutions
in Context: A Variationist Perspective on the Meta-Illocutionary Lexicon”. Corpus
Pragmatics 61: 63–88.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy
of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sönmez, Margaret J-M. 2005. “A Study of Request Markers in
English Family Letters from 1623 to 1660”. European Journal of English
Studies 9 (1): 9–19.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2009. An
Introduction to Late Modern
English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and Fátima Faya Cerqueiro. 2007. “Saying
Please in Late Modern English”. In Javier Pérez Guerra, Dolores González Alvarez, Jorge L. Bueno Alonso and Esperanza Rama Martínez (eds), “Of
Varying Language and Opposing Creed”: New Insights into Late Modern
English, 421–444. Bern: Peter Lang.
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage
Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and
Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vogt, Yvonne. 2022. The
Metalanguage of Conduct: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach to Lexico-Grammatical Patterns of Evaluative Adjectives in 18th-Century
Epistolary Fiction. (Master’s
dissertation.) Zurich: University of Zurich.
Watts, Richard J. 1999. “Language and Politeness in
Early Eighteenth Century
Britain”. Pragmatics 9 (1): 5–20.