Introduction published In: Corpus-Pragmatic Studies of Democratization in Public Discourses: New perspectives, methods and materials
Edited by Turo Hiltunen, Turo Vartiainen and Jenni Räikkönen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2] 2024
► pp. 177–192
Introduction
Democratisation
How can historical corpus pragmatics contribute to understanding changes in the recent history of English?
Published online: 9 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00072.hil
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00072.hil
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Meanings of democratisation
- 3.Towards a corpus-pragmatic perspective on democratization
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (45)
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Drift
and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three
Genres.” Language 65 (3): 487–517.
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. 2012. “The
Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy. Written Language in the Age of Mass
Literacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of
English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2013. “Being
Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register.” Journal of English
Linguistics 41 (2): 104–134.
Biber, Douglas, Jack Grieve, and Gina Iberri-Shea. 2009. “Noun
Phrase Modification”. In One Language, Two
Grammars, ed. by Günter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlüter, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2010. “Locating
Identity in Language.” In Language and
Identities, ed. by Carmen Llamas, and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization
and Research Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge (eds). 2018. The
Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. 1st
ed. London: Routledge.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Minna Nevala. 2012. “Sociocultural
Processes and the History of English.” In The Oxford Handbook of
the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 365–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. [URL]
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse &
Society 10 (2): 149–173.
. 1995. “Technologisation
of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical
Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen. 1997. “The
Conversationalisation of Political Discourse: A Comparative View.” Belgian Journal of
Linguistics 11 (1): 89–119.
Fanego, Teresa, and Paula Rodríguez-Puente (eds). 2019. Corpus-Based
Research on Variation in English Legal
Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane. 2012. “Democratisation.” In The
Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gonçalves, Bruno, Lucía Loureiro-Porto, José J. Ramasco, and David Sánchez. 2018. “Mapping
the Americanization of English in Space and Time.” PLOS
ONE 13 (5).
Greenfield, Patricia M. 2013. “The Changing Psychology of
Culture from 1800 through 2000.” Psychological
Science 24 (9): 1722–1731.
Heller, Monica. 2010. “The
Commodification of Language.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 391: 101–114.
Hilpert, Martin. 2020. “The
Great Temptation. What Diachronic Corpora Do and Do Not Reveal about Social
Change.” In Corpora and the Changing Society. Studies in the
Evolution of English, ed. by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi, and Juhani Klemola, 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hiltunen, Turo. 2021. “Exploring
Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers
Database.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Register
Variation, ed. by Elena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2020. “Democratisation
of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language
Sciences 791.
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating
Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th
Century.” Language Sciences 791.
Hiltunen, Turo, and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) 2022. Corpus
pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Holly, Werner. 2008. “Tabloidisation
of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of
Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 317–342. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’
and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-Based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International
Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 4 (2): 221–241.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the
Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
Landert, Daniela. 2014. Personalisation
in Mass Media Communication: British Online News between Public and
Private. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli, and Miriam A. Locher. 2023. Corpus
Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change
in Contemporary English: A Grammatical
Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, and Turo Hiltunen. 2020. “Democratisation
and Gender-neutrality in English(es).” Journal of English
Linguistics 48 (3): 215–232.
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-Century
English: History, Variation and
Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech. 2006. “Current
change in English syntax.” In The Handbook of English
Linguistics, ed. by Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell.
Myhill, John. 1995. “Change
and Continuity in the Functions of the American English
modals.” Linguistics 33 (2): 157–211.
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El siglo xx como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de o
sea [The 20th century as a diachrony: Intuition and case of
o sea].” Rilce. Revista de Filología
Hispánica 30 (3): 985–1016.
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Corpus
Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A
Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Martin Hilpert. 2017. “Colloquialization
in Journalistic Writing: The Case of Inserts with a Focus on Well.” Journal of
Historical
Pragmatics 18 (1): 104–135.
Schützler, Ole. 2020. “Frequency
Changes and Stylistic Levelling of Though in Diachronic and Synchronic Varieties of English – Linguistic
Democratisation?” Language Sciences 791.
Skärlund, Sanna. 2018. “Den intima ledaren? Om ledarartiklar, informalisering och språklig
förändring [The intimate editorial? On editorial articles, informalisation,
and linguistic change].” Språk &
Stil 281: 78–111.
Smitterberg, Erik. 2021. Syntactic
Change in Late Modern English: Studies on Colloquialization and
Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen (eds). 2014. Diachronic
Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse
and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse
Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
