Cover not available

Article published In: Politeness in and across Historical Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster, Gudrun Held and Dániel Z. Kádár
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1] 2023
► pp. 143–159

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Historical language use in Europe from a contrastive pragmatic perspective

An exploratory case study of letter closings

 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics | University of Hamburg
 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics
 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages
 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages
Published online: 9 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
Abstract
This paper presents a case study which brings together the fields of contrastive pragmatics and historical pragmatics. Specifically, we contrastively investigate the ways in which the speech act set of “farewell” – representing the closing phase of an interaction – was realised in nineteenth-century historical letters in different linguacultures, including the English, German and Chinese ones. We argue that contrastive pragmatics provides a fruitful contribution to historical research for two inter-related reasons. First, contrastive pragmatics allows us to identify similar pragmatic patterns between typologicially “close” linguacultures, such as the English and the German ones. Second, it prompts researchers to attest the validity of such patterns by comparing such typologically close linguacultures with more distant ones such as the Chinese. Our study is based on a corpus of family letters written to elderly relatives.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Objectives
    • 1.2Our approach
    • 1.3Previous research
  • 2.Methodology and data
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1The rhetoric of pre-farewell
    • 3.2The formality of pre-farewells and farewells
    • 3.3The performative versus non-performative expression of farewells
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Primary sources
Sollors, Werner and Ruth I. Cape (eds). 2014. New World View: Letters from a German Immigrant Family in Texas (1854–1885). (New Directions in German-American Studies.) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henrietta E. Litchfield (ed.). 2010. Emma Darwin, Wife of Charles Darwin: A Century of Family Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeng Guofan jiashu 曾国藩家书 (‘The Family Letter of Zeng Guofan’). 2008. Beijing Yanshan Edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Bax, Marcel. 2010. “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness and Ritual Display in Early Modern Dutch Letters”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (ed.), Historical (Im)Politeness, 37–85. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Stamford: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bös, Birte. 2007. “What Do You Lacke? What is it You Buy? Early Modern English Service Encounters”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 219–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki (eds). 2008. Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds). 2012. Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis. 1981. Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis and Juliane House. 1981. Let’s Talk and Talk About It: An Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1969. “How to Do Things with Words: Performative Utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone”. Man 4 (4): 537–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, David. 2006. “Irish Emigration and The Art of Letter-Writing”. In Bruce S. Elliott, David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke (eds), Letters across Borders, 97–106. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomenon in Modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Yingjie and Baogang He. 1999. “Reimagining the Chinese Nation: The ‘Zeng Guofan Phenomenon’”. Modern China 25 (2): 142–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendrickx, Iris, Michel Generaux and Rita Marquilhas. 2011. “Automatic Pragmatic Text Segmentation of Historical Letters”. In C. Sporleder (ed.), Language Technology for Cultural Heritage: Selected Papers from the LaTeCH Conference Series, 135–153. New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
How, James. 2019. Epistolary Spaces: English Letter-Writing from the Foundation of the Post Office to Richardson’s “Clarissa”. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1996. “Contrastive Discourse Analysis and Misunderstanding: The Case of German and English”. In Marlis Hellinger and Amon Ulrich (eds), Contrastive Sociolinguistics, 345–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Politeness in Germany. Politeness is Germany?” In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe, pp. 13–28. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Communicative Styles in English and German”. European Journal of English Studies 10 (3): 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Translation as Communication across Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 2017. “Speech Acts and Speech Act Sequences: Greetings and Farewells in the History of American English”. Studia Neophilologica 891: 39–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2010. Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Juliane House. 2020. “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach”. Pragmatics 30 (1): 142–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held and Annick Paternoster. 2023. “Introduction: Politeness in and across Historical Europe”. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24 (1): 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred. 2006. “Abbreviations in Early Modern English Correspondence”. In Marina Dossena and Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations, 107–128. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds). 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panetta, Clayann Gilliam (ed.). 2001. Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara. 2011. “Honorifics: The Cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism in Japanese”. In Dániel Z. Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 45–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. 2014. “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methodological Approach”. In Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richter, Antje. 2013. Letters and Epistolary Culture in Early Medieval China. Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker. 2019. “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics 1441: 56–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1988. “Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1): 55–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum and Pascale Fung. 2013. Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate”. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 73–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Matylda Włodarczyk. 2021. “Contrastive Pragmatics in a Diachronic Perspective: Insights from Othello”. Contrastive Pragmatics 2 (2): 168–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jucker, Andreas H.
2024. Speech Acts, DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held & Annick Paternoster
2023. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue