Cover not available

Article published In: Politeness in and across Historical Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster, Gudrun Held and Dániel Z. Kádár
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1] 2023
► pp. 86–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

German and Romance civility in contact

Retracing Early Modern European dynamics of polite address through historical foreign language manuals

 | Freie Universität Berlin
Published online: 6 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00061.gen
Abstract
In this paper, I argue for a systematic study of the role that language contact has played in the development of German, French, Italian and Spanish address systems. While the current state of research clearly points to contact-induced changes in Early Modern European polite address, some important desiderata concerning the precise direction, nature and scope of contact influences remain. Against this background, I present historical foreign language manuals as a promising source for the comparative study of historical European address practices and their development. Through an explorative analysis of metapragmatic comments and model dialogues in selected foreign language manuals, the increasingly dynamic pressures experienced by interlocutors both to distance themselves from one another and to express solidarity come to light, as multi-level address systems emerge and mixed styles of address gain in importance.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contact-induced changes of forms of address in Early Modern Europe: Current state of research
    • 2.1Theoretical background
    • 2.2Romance linguistics
    • 2.3Linguistic typology
  • 3.Some critical remarks
    • 3.1On the chronology and direction of contact influences
    • 3.2On the nature and scope of contact influences
  • 4.Towards a comprehensive account of Early Modern contact-induced changes in forms of address
    • 4.1Early Modern foreign language manuals
    • 4.2Metapragmatic insights
    • 4.3Examining socio-pragmatic variation and change through model dialogues
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Sources
  • References
References (31)
Sources
Chirchmair, Matthias. 1703. Grammatica della lingua Todesca. Venice: Lorenzo Basegio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colloques avec un dictionnaire en six langues; flamen, anglois, alleman, françois, espagnol, & italien. 1576. Antwerp: Henric Hendrickx.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deschamps, Pierre. 1690. Nouvelle Grammaire ou Méthode. Besançon: Louis Rigoine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Sumarán, Juan Ángel. 1621. Das Newe Sprachbuch. Munich: Anna Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
di Veneroni, Giovanni. 1694. Der Vollkommene Italiänische Sprachmeister. Frankfurt am Main: Philipp Fievet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthias. 1696. Nouveau Parlement. C’est à dire Dialogues François-Alemands. Frankfurt am Main: Johann Balthasar Niesen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
La Civilité Novvelle: Contenant la vraye & parfaite Instruction de la Jeunesse. 1671. Basel: Johann-Herman Widerhold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Andersen, Gisle. 2014. “Pragmatic Borrowing”. Journal of Pragmatics 671 (June): 17–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 1995. The Fortunes of the Courtier: The European Reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “A Civil Tongue: Language and Politeness in Early Modern Europe”. In Peter Burke and Brian Harrison (eds), Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas, 31–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. 1895. La lingua spagnuola in Italia: appunti [‘The Spanish Language in Italy: Notes’]. Rome: Loescher.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2017. “The Influence of Italian Manners on Politeness in England, 1550–1620”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 195–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrismann, Gustav. 1902. “Duzen und Ihrzen im Mittelalter (Fortsetzung)” [‘Address with “du” and “ihr” in the Middle Ages (Continuation)’]. Zeitschrift Für Deutsche Wortforschung 21: 118–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faraco, Carlos Alberto. 2017. “O tratamento ‘você’ em português: uma abordagem histórica” [‘The Form of Address ‘você’ in Portuguese: A Historical Approach’]. LaborHistórico 3 (2): 114–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2015. “Thanking Formulae: The Role of Language Contact in the Diachrony of Italian”. In Carlo Consani (ed.), Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato [‘Interlinguistic Contact between the Present and the Past’], 315–341. Il Segno e Le Lettere 14. Milan: LED. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grand, Camille. 1930. Tu, voi, Lei: Étude des pronoms allocutoires italiens [‘Tu, Voi, Lei: Study of Italian Pronouns of Address’]. (PhD thesis.) Fribourg.
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2003. “Politeness Distinctions in Second Person Pronouns”. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Höflichkeitspronomina in Europa – Synchronie und Diachronie eines arealtypologischen Merkmals” [‘Polite Pronouns in Europe – Synchrony and Diachrony of an Areal Feature’]. In Uwe Hinrichs (ed.), Handbuch der Eurolinguistik [‘Manual of Eurolinguistics’], 683–702. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Politeness Distinctions in Personal Pronouns: A Case Study on Competing Motivations”. In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik (eds), Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, 315–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Joanna Kopaczyk. 2017. “Historical (Im)Politeness”. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 433–460. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held and Annick Paternoster. 2023. “Introduction: Politeness in and across Historical Europe”. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24 (1): 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Listen, Paul. 1999. The Emergence of German Polite Sie: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. New York: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron and Jeanette Sakel. 2007. “Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence”. Studies in Language 31 (4): 829–865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno. 1957. “Primordi del Lei” [‘Origins of “Lei”’]. In Saggi linguistici, 187–196. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 2018. “Sociocultural and Linguistic Constraints in Address Choice from Latin to Italian”. In Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Positioning the Self and Others: Linguistic Perspectives, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niculescu, Alexandru. 1974. Strutture allocutive pronominali reverenziali in italiano [‘Pronominal Structures of Reverential Address in Italian’]. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
del Olmo, Francisco Javier Calvo. 2011. “Sobre la gramaticalización de los tratamientos nominales en las lenguas románicas: paralelismos e influencias” [‘About the Grammaticalization of Nominal Forms of Address in the Romance Languages: Parallelisms and Influences’]. Caligrama: Revista de Estudos Românicos 16 (2): 131–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, Konrad. 2000. “Kommerzielle und kulturelle Interessen am Unterricht der Volkssprachen im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert” [‘Commercial and Cultural Interest for Vernacular Language Teaching in the 15th and 16th Centuries’]. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe and Kees Versteegh (eds), History of the Language Sciences, 681–687. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennung, Josef. 1958. Anredeformen: Vergleichende Forschungen zur indirekten Anrede in der dritten Person und zum Nominativ für den Vokativ [‘Forms of Address: Comparative Studies of Indirect Third Person Address and of the Nominative for the Vocative’]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fremer, Maria
2023. The informalisation of address practice in Swedish in a historical perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held & Annick Paternoster
2023. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue