Cover not available

Article published In: Historical Pragmatics today: Articles in honour of Andreas H. Jucker
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Jonathan Culpeper
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2] 2021
► pp. 225–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The sociopragmatic nature of interjections in Early Modern English drama comedy

From ah to tut

 | Vienna University of Economics and Business
Published online: 13 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00054.lut
Abstract
Interjections have been studied for all periods in the history of English, ranging from the study of Old English exclamations such as hwaet ( 2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) to the pragmatic functions of forms such as oops in Present Day English (Lutzky, Ursula and Andrew Kehoe. 2017. “‘Oops, I Didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant’: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data”. Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 27–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). The Early Modern English (EModE) period represents a turning point as it witnessed an increase in dialogic and speech-related text types, including drama comedy and trial proceedings. Nevertheless, despite recent advances in the compilation and especially the sociopragmatic annotation of corpora, EModE pragmatic markers have not been studied extensively over the last decade. This article addresses this gap by offering an investigation into the sociopragmatic nature of interjections in EModE drama comedy. It is based on the sociopragmatically annotated Drama Corpus which includes a total of 242,561 words from the period 1500 to 1760. Taking a data-driven, form-to-function mapping approach, this study explores the use of interjections in the Drama Corpus with a focus on their distribution according to sociopragmatic variables. The aim of this study is to contribute to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of pragmatic marker use in EModE.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pragmatic markers
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora
  • References
References (37)
Corpora
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (ced). 2006. Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (ppceme). 2004. Compiled by Anthony Kroch, Beatrice Santorini and Lauren Delfs. See: [URL].
Sociopragmatic Corpus (spc). 2007. Annotated under the supervision of Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). A derivative of A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760, compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2004. “Interjections in a Contrastive Perspective”. In Edda Weigand (ed.), Emotion in Dialogic Interaction: Advances in the Complex, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Pragmatic Markers”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1992. “Interjections: The Universal Yet Neglected Part of Speech”. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (2): 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amsler, Mark. 2021. The Medieval Life of Language: Grammar and Pragmatics from Bacon to Kempe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. In Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F. 2002. A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Samuel J. Oliver. 2020. “Pragmatic Noise in Shakespeare’s Plays”. In Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson (eds), Voices Past and Present – Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts, 11–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 2006. “Eala, geferan and gode wyrhtan: On Interjections in Old English”. In John Walmsley (ed.), Inside Old English: Essays in Honour of Bruce Mitchell, 91–116. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2002. “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. In Richard Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (5): 894–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Corpus Pragmatics”. In Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv. 1998. “Discourse Markers: Introduction”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans and Meta Links. 2020. “Discourse Particles in Early English: Clause Structure, Pragmatics and Discourse Management”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5 (1): 31, 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. 2006. “Impoliteness in Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7 (2): 213–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2000. “Soþlice and witodlice. Discourse Markers in Old English”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 229–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Early Modern English Discourse Markers – A Feature of Female Speech?” In Gabriella Mazzon and Luisanna Fodde (eds), Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue, 80–98. Naples: Franco Angeli Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula and Jane Demmen. 2013. “Pray in Early Modern English Drama”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (2): 263–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula and Andrew Kehoe. 2017. “‘Oops, I Didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant’: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data”. Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 27–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 866–891. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. (Online Edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at: [URL]
Person, Raymond F. 2009. “‘Oh’ in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (1): 84–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauer, Hans. 2008. “Interjection, Emotion, Grammar, and Literature”. In Masachiyo Amano, Michiko Ogura and Masayuki Ohkado (eds), Historical Englishes in Varieties of Texts and Contexts, 387–403. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. In Andreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 439–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C. 2015. “‘Ah, Pox o’ your Pad-lock’: Interjections in the Old Bailey Corpus 1720–1913”. Journal of Pragmatics 861: 68–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Jucker, Andreas H.
2025. Historical Pragmatics: The Evolution of Language Use. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue