Cover not available

Article published In: The Role of Pragmatics in Cyclic Language Change
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2] 2020
► pp. 315–346

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Some reflections on semantic–pragmatic cycles

 | University of Valencia
 | University of Valencia
Published online: 3 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00046.pon
Abstract
This paper explores novel ways to consider semantic–pragmatic cycles using a dual strategy: an inwards strategy, whereby the distinctive traits of a pragmatic cycle are established, and an outwards strategy, whereby the categories that delimit semantic–pragmatic cycles are described. The result of this exploration is the distinction between “pragmatic cycle”, “replication”, “concomitance” and “paradigmatic increase” as four different yet related processes. In addition, this study integrates Construction Grammar into the description of each process and shows that the study of semantic–pragmatic cycles can benefit from a constructional approach, adopting Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2018. “Modeling Language Change with Constructional Networks”. In Salvador Pons and Oscar Loureda (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 17–50. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar models, and including concepts from European structuralism, particularly the notions of “paradigm”, “diasystem” and “functional language” (“lengua funcional”).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The dual origin of cyclicity and how to overcome it
    • 2.1Cyclicity in its initial stage
    • 2.2What S–P cycles are
    • 2.3What S–P cycles are not
  • 3.Cyclicity from the point of view of its essential features
    • 3.1Introduction
      • 3.1.1Items with similar meaning
      • 3.1.2Repetition of a linguistic change (similar source meaning > similar pragmatic extension)
      • 3.1.3Gradual acquisition
      • 3.1.4Persistence/loss of the micro-construction
      • 3.1.5Different time spans
      • 3.1.6The same (or close) diatopic, diastratic and diaphasic varieties
  • 4.A case of cyclicity: macho-tío/a
    • 4.1Macho
    • 4.2Tío/a
    • 4.3The expansion of tío/a
  • 5.Cyclicity-related cases
    • 5.1A concomitance development: macho/tío versus güey
    • 5.2A case of replication: igual/lo mismo
    • 5.3Paradigmatic increase: esto es/o sea
  • 6.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Corpora
  • References
References (49)
Corpora
Briz, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabedo, Adrián and Salvador Pons. Corpus Val.Es.Co. 2.0. Accessed May 2018 at: [URL]
Marcos Marín, Francisco (dir.). Corpus Oral de Referencia de la Lengua Española Contemporánea (corlec). Available online at: [URL]
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (corde). Corpus diacrónico del español. Accessed December and January 2018 at: [URL]
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (crea). Corpus de referencia del español actual. Accessed February and March 2018 at: [URL]
References
Beinhauer, Werner. 1991 [1964]. El español coloquial. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio and Val.Es.Co. Research Group. 2003. “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial”. Oralia 61: 7–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1952. Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Lecciones de lingüística general. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. Principios de semántica estructural. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuenca, Maria Josep. 1992–93. “Sobre l’evolució dels nexes conjuntius en català”. Llengua and Literatura 51: 173–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuello, Carlos. 2015. Historia de la partícula discursiva hombre: condicionamientos sincrónicos y evolución diacrónica. Unpublished MA Thesis. Valencia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Latte, Fien and Renata Enghels. 2018. “La variación (socio)lingüística del vocativo en el español madrileño actual”. In Martin Glessgen, Johannes Kabatek and Harald Völker (eds), Repenser la variation linguistique, 233–248. Strasbourg: EliPhi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garachana, Mar. 2008. “En los límites de la gramaticalizacion. La evolución de encima (de que) como marcador del discurso”. Revista de Filologia Espanola 88 (1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Deverbal pragmatic markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. quaeso and It. prego): the cyclic nature of functional developments”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glare, Peter G. W. 1996. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glessgen, Martin, Johannes Kabatek and Harald Völker. 2018. Repenser la variation linguistique. Strasbourg: EliPhi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael and Suzanne Carroll. 1978. Language and Situation: Language Varieties and Their Social Contexts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2014. “Cyclicity in semantic/pragmatic change: the Medieval particle ja between Latin IAM and Modern French déjà’ ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Cyclic phenomena in the evolution of pragmatic markers. Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons and Oscar Loureda (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 51–77. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrero Ingelmo, Jose Luis. 2006. “¿Cómo surgen los conectores: los reformuladores del discurso id est, esto es, es decir? ” Revista de Lexicografia 131: 45–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoyos Gonzalez, Margarita de. 1981. “Una variedad en el habla coloquial: la jerga ‘cheli’”. Cauce: Revista de filologia y su diddctica 41: 31–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Host og Son.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre. 2008. “ Tío y tía como marcadores en el lenguaje de Madrid”. In Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde and Ramón González Ruiz (eds), Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional e la Sociedad Español de Lingüística (SEL), 387–396. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleinknecht, Friederike. 2013. “Mexican güey -from vocative to discourse marker: a case of grammaticalisation?” In Barbara Sonnenhauser and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds), Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, 141–174. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe -Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit un Schriftkichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachheschichte”. Romanistisches Jahbuch 361: 15–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lázaro Carreter, Fernando. 1979. “Una jerga juvenil: ‘el cheli’”. ABC, 14/10/1979: 1181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llopis Cardona, Ana. 2018. “Sobre la pragmaticalización de lo mismo e igual como marcadores epistémicos”. In Ester Brenes, Marina González and Francisco Javier Grande (eds), Enunciado y discurso: estructura y relaciones, 153–179. Universidad de Sevilla: Sevilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “La gramaticalización del igual americano como reformulador y concesivo: ¿caso de réplica de lo mismo?” Onomázein, 561.
Llopis Cardona, Ana and Marta Pilar Montañez Mesas. 2020. “Los marcadores apelativos en el español peninsular”. In Antonio Hidalgo and Adrián Cabedo (eds), Pragmática del español hablado: hacia nuevos horizontes, 319–336. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, Andre. 1952. “Function, Structure, and Sound Change”. Word 8 (1): 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moliner, Maria. 1967. Diccionario de uso del espanol. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pardo Llibrer, Adrià. 2019. “Approximatives vs. approximators: a case of spiral-like cycle?” 2nd Workshop on Cyclicity in Semantic–Pragmatic Change. 8–9 October 2018. University of Manchester. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2008. “Grammaticalization por tradiciones discursivas: el caso de esto es”. In Johannes Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis historica del espanoly cambio linguistico: nuevasperspectivas desde las tradiciones discursivas, 249–274. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Iberoamericana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2014a. Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Paths of Grammaticalization in Spanish o sea ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 109–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Paths of grammaticalization: beyond the LP/RP debate”. In Salvador Pons and Oscar Loureda (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, XX–XX. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador and Oscar Loureda Lamas (eds). 2018. Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Espanola. 1739. Diccionario de Autoridades. Madrid: Real Academia Espanola.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sevi, Aldo. 1998. A Semantics for ‘Almost’ and ‘Barely’. Tel-Aviv University, Master Dissertation: Tel-Aviv.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovar Llorente, Antonio. 1968. Latín de Hispania. Aspectos léxicos de la romanización. Discurso de recepción en la Real Academia. Madrid: Real Academia Española.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2018. “Modeling Language Change with Constructional Networks”. In Salvador Pons and Oscar Loureda (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 17–50. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Val.Es.Co. Research Group. 2014. “Las unidades del discurso oral. La propuesta Val.Es.Co de segmentation de la conversation (coloquial)”. Estudios de Linguistica del español/Infoling 35 (1): 13–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1954. “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?” Word 101, 288–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Richard Waltereit
2025. Cyclic Change in Grammar and Discourse, DOI logo
Maldonado, Ricardo
2024. Bestial and warm addressing forms in Mexican Spanish. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Maldonado, Ricardo
2024.  No seas buey, cabrón . Spanish in Context 21:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Ana Vazeilles
2024. Diatopic variation as evidence for diachronic changes in the 20th and 21st centuries. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Ana Vazeilles
2024. Culturas juveniles como catalizador de la pragmaticalización de los marcadores tipo y onda en Argentina y México. Spanish in Context 21:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2024. How are linguistic changes in the 20th century to be studied?. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue