Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp.109–136
Local grammars and diachronic speech act analysis
A case study of apology in the history of American English
Published online: 28 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00038.su
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00038.su
Abstract
This paper proposes a method that is designed to facilitate diachronic speech act analysis. The proposed method
draws on the corpus linguistic concept of local grammar – an approach which seeks to account for, not the whole of a language, but
one meaning or function only. Local grammar descriptions capture both formal and semantic regularities of speech act realisations,
and local grammars offer a more reliable way to quantify speech act realisations across time. It is particularly in this respect
that it is argued that a local grammar approach can be useful for diachronic speech act studies, which is demonstrated
subsequently by tracing one particular speech act, namely “apology”, in a sample of the Corpus of Historical American English
(coha).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Local grammar
- 3.Corpus and data retrieval
- 4.A local grammar analysis of apology
- 5.Results and discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (37)
Archer, Dawn. 2010. “Speech Acts”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 379–418. (Volume 81.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barnbrook, Geoff. 2002. Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bednarek, Monika. 2007. “Local Grammar and Register Variation: Explorations in Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspaper Discourse”. Empirical Language Research 1 (1): 1–20.
Bella, Spyridoula. 2014. “A Contrastive Study of Apologies Performed by Greek Native Speakers and English Learners of Greek as a Foreign Language”. Pragmatics 24 (4): 679–713.
Bergner, Heinz. 1992. “The Pragmatics of Medieval Texts”. In Dieter Stein (ed.), The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, 163–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Winnie and Tiffany Ching. 2018. “‘Not a Guarantee of Future Performance’: The Local Grammar of Disclaimers”. Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 263–301.
Davies, Mark. 2012a. “Some Methodological Issues Related to Corpus-based Investigations of Recent Syntactic Changes in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 157–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2012b. “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-million Words Corpus of Historical American English”. Corpora 7 (2): 121–57.
Deutschmann, Mats. 2003. Apologising in British English. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.) Umeå University, Sweden.
Fitzmaurice, Susan and Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2007. Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garcia, Paula. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, Susan. 2002. “Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching, and Linguistic Variation: Applications of a Corpus-Driven Grammar”. In Randi Reppen, Susan Fitzmaurice and Doug Biber (eds), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, 167–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “A Local Grammar of Evaluation”. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, Susan and Hang Su. 2019. “Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’”. Applied Linguistics 40 (4): 567–593.
Jacobsson, Mattias. 2002. “‘Thank You’ and ‘Thanks’ in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. “Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1611–1635.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95.
(eds). 2008a. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2008b. “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–443. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014a. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014b. “Complimenting in the History of American English: A Metacommunicative Expression Analysis”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 257–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. “Explicit Performatives in Old English: A Corpus-Based Study of Directives”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (2): 301–321.
. 2007. “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. “Tracing Directives Through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Diachronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koptytko, Roman. 1995. “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 515–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Su, Hang. 2017. “Local Grammars of Speech Acts: An Exploratory Study”. Journal of Pragmatics 1111: 72–83.
. 2018. “Thank Bloody God It’s Friday: A Local Grammar of Thanking”. Corpus Pragmatics 2 (1): 83–105.
Su, Hang and Naixing Wei. 2018. “‘I’m Really Sorry About What I Said’: A Local Grammar of Apology”. Pragmatics 28 (3): 439–462.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vanderveken, Daniel. 2001. “Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory”. In Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo (eds), Essays in Speech Act Theory, 25–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Huang, Ding & Jiajin Xu
Jucker, Andreas H.
Tang, Mengyuan
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka, Ulrike Gut & Folajimi Oyebola
Ye, Jun, Changpeng Huan & Hang Su
Yu, Danni, Hang Su & Marina Bondi
Zhang, Yiming & Lei Zhang
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Su, Hang & Xiaofei Lu
Su, Hang & Xiaofei Lu
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Meng Huat Chau
Saleem, Tahir, Uzma Unjum, Munawar Iqbal Ahmed, Ayaz Qadeer & Krisda Chaemsaithong
Saleem, Tahir, Musarat Yasmin, Aisha Saleem & Krisda Chaemsaithong
Su, Hang
2021. Changing patterns of apology in spoken British English. Pragmatics and Society 12:3 ► pp. 410 ff.
Su, Hang
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
Su, Hang & Lei Zhang
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
