Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp.53–82
Pseudo-hortative and the development of the discourse marker eti poca (‘well, let’s see’) in Korean
Published online: 28 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00036.rhe
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00036.rhe
Abstract
Hortative constructions are good sources of discourse markers (dms) because they have an engaging effect
on the addressee. Such an engaging illocutionary effect enables hortative-based dms to acquire diverse functions, such as
attracting and maintaining the addressee’s attention and foiling the interlocutor’s initiating an utterance. The
dm eti poca (‘well, let’s see’; literally ‘where, let’s see’) is not a genuine hortative
requesting the addressee to direct visual attention to something or somewhere together with the speaker, but is a strategic signal
for management of interaction, information and the speaker’s self. The detailed functions that emerged through time include
marking the speaker’s intent to hold the floor by way of filling unwanted pauses, to solicit common ground, to signal
responsiveness, to encourage self to better concentrate on a task, and to affirm the self’s stance on the issues at hand.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Historical development of eti (‘where’) and poca (‘let’s see’)
- 2.1The development of eti (‘where’)
- 2.2The semantic extension of po- (‘see’)
- 2.3The development of the hortative -ca (‘let’s’)
- 2.3.1True hort: The “we”-Function
- 2.3.2Quasi-hort: The “I”-Function
- 2.3.3Pseudo-hort: The “you”-Function
- 2.3.4Composite dm eti poca: The discourse function
- 3.Functions of eti poca in pdk
- 3.1Interaction management
- 3.2Information management
- 3.3Self-management
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Grammatical change
- 4.2Semasiological change
- 4.3Discursive change
- 5.Summary and conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (36)
Beeching, Kate and Ulirch Detges. 2014. “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Degand, Liesbeth and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. “Grammaticalization or Pragmaticalization of Discourse Markers? More Than a Terminological Issue”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 59–85.
Diewald, Gabriel. 2006. “Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay and Mary Kay O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone”. Language 641: 501–538.
. 2006. “Toward a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English”. Language and Communication 321: 182–204.
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Sara W. Smith. 1998. “And People Just You Know Like “Wow”: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva. 2011. “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language 35 (4): 852–897.
Koo, Hyun Jung and Seongha Rhee. 2013. “On an Emerging Paradigm of Sentence-Final Particles of Discontent: A Grammaticalization Perspective”. Language Sciences 371: 70–89. .
Lee, Han-gyu. 2008. “The Pragmatics of the Discourse Particle eti”. Urimalgeul: The Korean Language and Literature 441: 83–111.
Leith, Dick, and George Myerson. 1989. The Power of Address: Explorations in Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
Martin, Samuel E. 1992. A Reference Grammar of Korean. A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean Language. Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing.
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1982. “The Symbolic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech”. In Nils Erik Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, 147–177. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.
Rhee, Seongha. 2008. “From Rhetoric to Grammar: Grammaticalization of Rhetorical Strategies in Korean”. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 131: 359–370.
. 2012. “Context-Induced Reinterpretation and (Inter)subjectification: The Case of Grammaticalization of Sentence-Final Particles”. Language Sciences 341: 284–300.
. 2017. “What Happens When the Will Withers: The Case of Hortative in Korean”. Lingua 189/1901: 46–65.
Rhee, Seongha, and Hyun Jung Koo. 2017. “Audience-Blind Sentence-Enders in Korean: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 1201: 101–121.
Sung, Ki Ryun. 2013. “A Study on the Association between the 154-sheet Chunhyangga Owned by Hong Yun-pyo and the Pansori of Junggoje of the Mid-19th Century”. Journal of Pansori 361: 39–92.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. 13–18 August 1995. Manchester, UK.
van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. “I think and Other Complement-taking Mental Predicates: A Case of and for Constructional Grammaticalization”. Linguistics 49 (2): 295–332.
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed)., Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Jucker, Andreas H.
Sunhee Yae
Rhee, Seongha & Hyun Jung Koo
2021. On divergent paths and functions of ‘background’-based discourse
markers in Korean. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219], ► pp. 77 ff.
Shan, Yi
Shan, Yi
Kim, Ahrim & Iksoo Kwon
2020. The Korean hortative construction revisited. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
