To be specified published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 6:1 (2016) ► pp.72–92
Article
How the accusative became the relative
A Samoyedic key to the Eskimo-Uralic relationship?
Published online: 29 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.6.1.03for
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.6.1.03for
Abstract
The Eskimo-Uralic hypothesis of a genetic link between Eskimo-Aleut and the Uralic languages is now reaching its second centenary. Two major problems with its advancement since Bergsland, Knut. 1959. The Eskimo-Uralic Hypothesis. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 611. 1–29. summary of its status are addressed in this article. The first of these is the lack of an obvious correlate of the ubiquitous Eskimo-Aleut (EA) relative case marker -m in Uralic; the other is the lack of an m-initial first person singular morpheme in EA to correlate with that of the Uralic languages. That the EA singular genitive/relative marker -m — as well as the instrumental/accusative singular -mək based on it — might be cognate with Uralic singular accusative -m was suggested already by Sauvageot, Aurélien. 1953. Caractère ouraloïde du verbe eskimo. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 491. 107–121., but no firm conclusion on the matter has since been reached. This has remained a tantalizing possibility, despite the conflicting semantics. However, the remarkable morphosyntactic parallels between Eskimo-Aleut and Samoyedic in particular have grown more apparent with recent publications. A solution is proposed, linking the emergence of ergativity in the Eskimo-Aleut family with a reanalysis of the original nominative-accusative case marking system.
Keywords: Eskimo-Uralic hypothesis, emergence of ergativity, Samoyedic
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The source of the Eskimo-Aleut relative case
- 3.Relative and accusative 1st person singular
- 4.A possible contiguous Eskimo-Uralic “homeland”
- 5.Summary
- Abbreviations
- Notes
References
References (35)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., & R. M. W. Dixon, eds. 2001. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance. Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergsland, Knut. 1959. The Eskimo-Uralic Hypothesis. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 611. 1–29.
1997. Aleut Grammar. Research Paper Number 10, Alaska Native Language Center. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Comrie, Bernard, 2010. The Role of Verbal Morphology in Establishing Genealogical Relations among Languages. Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance ed. by L. Johansen & M. Robbeets, 21–31. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
. 1997. Eskimo Influence on the Formation of the Chukotkan Ergative Clause. Studies in Language 21: 2. 369–409.
. 1998. Language Relations across Bering Strait: Reappraising the Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence. London: Cassell Academic.
Fortescue, Michael, Steven Jacobson, & Lawrence Kaplan. 2010. Comparative Eskimo Dictionary with Aleut Cognates. 2nd ed. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center Press.
Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2012. Early Contacts between Uralic and Yukagir. Per Urales ad Orientum, iter polyphonicum multilingue, Festskrift tillägnad Juha Janhunen på hans sextioårsdag den 12 februar 2012, Suomilais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne) 264. 91–101.
Heine, Bernd. 2009. Grammaticalization of Cases. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, eds., 458–469.
Ives, John. 2010. Dene-Yeniseian, Migration and Prehistory. The Dene-Yeniseian Connection ed. by J. Kari & B. A. Potter, 324–334. Fairbanks: Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series Vol. 51: 1–2.
. 2009. Proto-Uralic—What, Where, and When? The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 258. 57–78.
Kittilä, Seppo & Andrej Malchukov. 2009. Varieties of accusative. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer, eds., 549–561.
Malchukov, Andrej & Andrew Spencer, eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mikola, Tibor. 1988. Geschichte der Samojedischen Sprachen. The Uralic Languages ed. by Denis Sinor, 219–265. Leiden: Brill.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 1988. Problema uralo-jukogirskix svjazej. Dissertatsija kand. fil. nauk. Moskva: Akademija nauk.
Powers, W.R., & R.H. Jordan. 1990. Human Biography and Climate Change in Siberia and Arctic North America in the Fourth and Fifth Millennium BP. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 330: 1615. 665–670.
Pusztay, János. 2004. Thoughts on the Chain-Like Homeland of the Uralic People. The Mankind Quarterly 3/41. 313–328.
Rask, R. K. 1818. Undersōgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Kjōbenhavn: Gyldendalske Boghandlings Forlag.
Sauvageot, Aurélien. 1953. Caractère ouraloïde du verbe eskimo. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 491. 107–121.
Seefloth, Uwe. 2000. Polypersonale Paradigmen im Uralo-Sibirischen, Zentralasiatische Studien 301. 163–191.
Starikovskaya, E. B., R. I. Sukernik, O. A. Derbeneva, N. V. Volodko, E. Ruiz-Pesini, A. Torroni, M. D. Brown, M. T. Lott, S. H. Hosseini, K. Huoponen, & D. C. Wallace. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in Indigenous Populations of the Southern Extent of Siberia, and the Origins of Native American Haplogroups. Annals of Human Genetics 69: 1. 67–89.
Trask, Robert. 1979. On the Origins of Ergativity. Ergativity ed. by F. Plank, 385–404. London: Academic Press.
Turunen, Rigina. 2011. Parts of Speech in Non-Typical Function: (A)Symmetrical Encoding of Non-Verbal Predicates in Erzya. Linguistic Discovery 9: 1. 137–172.
Uhlenbeck, C. C. 1905. Uralische Anklänge in den Eskimosprachen. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 591. 757–765.
Volodko, N. V., E. B. Starikovskaya, I. O. Mazunin, N. P. Eltsov, P. V. Naidenko, D. C. Wallace, & R. I. Sukernik. 2008. Mitochondrial Genome Diversity in Arctic Siberians with Particular Reference to the Evolutionary History and Pleistocenic Peopling of the Americas. The American Journal of Human Genetics 821. 1084–1100.
