Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.161–191
Testing the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint
Analogical change and Russian verbs
Published online: 30 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.01nes
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.01nes
Although it has been widely assumed in historical linguistics that semantics plays a crucial role in analogical change, it is difficult to pinpoint the contribution of the semantic factor, since meaning and form work closely together in bringing about language change. The purpose of the present article is to shed light on the issue by means of two case studies from Russian, which enable us to isolate the role of semantics. The hypothesis we test is that analogical change is restricted to semantically homogeneous domains. We call this the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint. Two phenomena from Russian conjugation are explored: suffix shift and NU-drop. Although they seem parallel, analogical change occurs in the former, but not in the latter. It is argued that this is because the verbs involved in suffix shift constitute a semantically homogeneous domain, within which analogical change can take place. By contrast, NU-verbs are semantically diverse, and these semantic differences create boundaries which block analogical change. The findings have implications both for Russian and general linguistics. While suffix shift and NU-drop are well-known phenomena in Russian conjugation, they have not been juxtaposed and compared before. Our comparison provides new insights about the differences and similarities of the two phenomena. From the perspective of historical linguistics, the present article contributes to the theory of analogy, insofar as we provide empirical evidence for the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint, which places restrictions on semantic domains where analogical change can take place.
References (103)
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and Wholes: Implicative Patterns in Inflectional Paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins, eds., 54–82.
Albright, Adam. 2008. Explaining Universal Tendencies and Language Particulars in Analogical Change. In Jeff Good, ed., 144–182.
. 2009. Modeling Analogy as Probabilistic Grammar. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins, eds., 185–213.
. 1980. Russian Conjugation: Acquisition and Evolutive Change. Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott, 285–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1989. Markedness—The First 150 Years. Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony ed. by Olga Mišeska Tomić, 47–66. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2001. Markedness and the Theory of Linguistic Change. Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress ed. by Henning Andersen, 21–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Noget om analogi. Dramatikken i grammatikken ed. by Rita Therkelsen & Eva Skafte Jensen, 15–25. Roskilde: Institut for Kultur og Identitet, Roskilde Universitet.
Anttila, Raimo. 1977. Analogy. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton Publishers.
. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. 2nd revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1977. Analogy. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton Publishers.
. 2003. Analogy: The Warp and Woof of Cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, eds., 425–440.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. Predicting the Productivity of Argument Structure Constructions. Berkeley Linguistics Society 321.467–478.
. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Approach. Lingua 121: 1. 60–79.
Blevins, James P. & Juliette, Blevins. eds2009a. Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins. 2009b. Introduction: Analogy in Grammar. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins, eds., 1–12.
Bulaxovskij, Leonid A. 1950. Istoričeskij kommentarij k russkomu literaturnomu jazyku. Kiev: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izl’stvo “Radjans’ka škola”.
. 1954. Russkij literaturnyj jazyk pervoj poloviny XIX veka. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo ministra prosveščenija RSFSR.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007a. Diachronic Linguistics. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens, 945–974. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2007b. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. & Dan Slobin. 1982. Rules and Schemas in the Development and Use of the English Past Tense. Language 581.265–289.
Černyšev, Vasilij I. 1915. Pravil’nost’ i čistota russkoj reči. 2nd ed, Vol. 21. Petrograd: Tipografija M. Merkuševa.
Comrie, Bernard, Gerald Stone & Maria Polinsky. 1996. The Russian Language in the 20th Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co.
Dickey, Stephen M. 2001. “Semelfactive” -nǫ- and the Western Aspect Gestalt. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 9:1.25–48.
Dickey, Stephen M. & Laura A. Janda. 2009. Xoxotnul, sxitril: The Relationship between Semelfactives Formed with -nu- and s- in Russian. Russian Linguistics 33:3.229–248.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Natalia V. Gagarina. 1999. Basic Questions in Establishing the Verb Classes of Contemporary Russian. Essays in Poetics, Literary History and Linguistics Presented to V. V. Ivanov on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday ed. by L. Fleishman, M. Gasparov, T. Nikolaeva, A. Ospovat, V. Toporov, A. Vigasin, R. Vroon & A. Zaliznjak, 754–760. Moscow: OGI.
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2007. Grammaticalisation Due to Homonymy Avoidance in Gudbrandsdalen /æpr˛ede/? Transactions of the Philological Society 105:1. 42–65.
Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump. 2009. Principal Parts and Degrees of Paradigmatic Transparency. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins, eds., 13–53.
Gagarina, Natalija. 2003. The Early Verb Development and Demarcation of Stages in Three Russian-Speaking Children. Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective ed. by Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch, 131–170. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gentner, Dedre. 1989. The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning ed. by Stella Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony, 199–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gor, Kira. 2007. Experimental Study of First and Second Language Morphological Processing. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey, 367–398. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gor, Kira & Tatiana Chernigovskaya. 2004. Generation of Complex Verbal Morphology in First and Second Language Acquisition: Evidence from Russian. Nordlyd 31:6.819–833.
. 2005. Formal Instruction and the Acquisition of Verbal Morphology. Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition ed. by Alex Housen & Michel Pierrard, 103–139. New York & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gorbachov, Yaroslav V. 2007. Indo-European Origins of the Nasal Inchoative Class in Germanic, Baltic and Slavic. Harvard University doctoral dissertation.
Graudina, Ljudmila K., Viktor A. Ickovič & Lija P. Katlinskaja. 1976.
Grammatičeskaja pravil’nost’ russkoj reči
. Opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov. Moscow: Nauka.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics. 2nd ed revised and updated. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1995. On Seeing A’s and Seeing As. Stanford Humanities Review 4.2. Available at [URL]
. 2001. Epilogue: Analogy as the Core of Cognition. The Analogical Mind. Perspectives from Cognitive Science ed. by Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov, 499–538. Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press.
Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1960. Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim—Čast’ vtoraja: morfologija. Bratislava: Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk.
Itkonen, Esa. 2005. Analogy as Structure and Process. Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Janda, Laura A., Tore Nesset & R. Harald Baayen. 2010. Capturing Correlational Structure in Russian Paradigms: A Case Study in Logistic Mixed-Effects Modeling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6:1.29–48.
Joseph, Brian D. 2011. A Localistic Approach to Universals and Variation. Linguistic Universals and Language Variation ed. by Peter Siemund, 394–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda, eds. 2003. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kiebzak-Mandera, Dorota, Magdalena Smoczyńska & Ekaterina Protassova. 1997. Acquisition of Russian Verb Morphology: The Early Stages. Studies in Pre- and Protomorphology ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler, 101–114. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
King, Bruce M. & Edward Minium. 2008. Statistical Reasoning in the Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona. 2007. Analogy: The Relation between Lexicon and Grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1995 [1949]. The Nature of the So-called Analogical Processes. Translated into English and with an introduction by Margaret E. Winters. Diachronica 12:1.113–145. [Originally published in 1949 in Acta Linguistica 5.17–34].
Kuznetsova, Julia & Anastasia Makarova. 2012. Distribution of Two Semelfactives in Russian: -nu- and -anu-. OSLa (Oslo Studies in Language) 4:1.155–176.
Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jacson, Tina Tang & Martin A. Nowak. 2007. Quantifying the Evolutionary Dynamics of Language. Nature 4491.713–716.
Makarova, Anastasia & Laura A. Janda. 2009. Do It Once: A Case Study of the Russian -nu- Semelfactives. Scando-Slavica 551.78–99.
. 1980. Laws of Analogy. Historical Morphology ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 283–288. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton Publishers.
Matthews, Peter. 1994. Greek and Latin Linguistics. History of Linguistics. Volume II: Classical and Medieval Linguistics ed. by Giulio Lepschy, 1–133. London & New York: Longman.
. 2008b. Ob’’jasnenie togo, čto ne imelo mesto: Blokirovka suffiksal’nogo sdviga v russkix glagolax. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61.35–48.
. 2010b. Why Not? Prototypes and Blocking of Language Change in Russian Verbs. Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back ed. by Elzbieta Tabakowska, Michal Choinski & Lukasz Wiraszka, 125–144. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2013. The History of the Russian Semelfactive: The Development of a Radial Category. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21:1.123–169.
Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda. 2010. Paradigm Structure: Evidence from Russian Suffix Shift. Cognitive Linguistics 21:4.699–725.
Nesset, Tore & Julia Kuznetsova. 2011. Stability and Complexity: Russian Suffix Shift over Time. Scando-Slavica 57:2.268–289.
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova. 2011. “Nu-drop” in Russian Verbs: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Morphological Variation and Change. Russian Linguistics 35:4.41–63.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2000. ‘Bystro’ v grammatike russkogo i drugix jazykov. Slovo v tekste i v slovare: sbornik statej k semidesjatiletiju akademika Ju. D. Apresjana ed. by Leonid L. Iomdin & Leonid P. Krysin, 212–222. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at [URL]
Schuyt, Roel. 1990.
The Morphology of Slavic Verbal Aspect
: A Descriptive and Historical Study. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Skousen, Royal. 2002. An Overview of Analogical Modeling. Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-Based Approach to Language ed. by Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale & Dilworth B. Parkinson, 11–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Expanding Analogical Modeling into a General Theory of Language Prediction. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins, eds., 166–184.
Svistunova, Tatiana I. 2008. Organizacija mental’nogo leksikona: Formirovanie v ontogenze i raspad pri narušenijax jazykovoj sistemy glagol’noj slovoizmenitel’noj morfologii (èksperimental’noe issledovanie). St. Petersburg State University kandidatskaja dissertacija.
Tkachenko, Elena & Tatiana Chernigovskaya. 2010. Input Frequencies in Processing of Verbal Morphology in L1 and L2: Evidence from Russian, Oslo Studies in Language 2:2.281–318.
Vinogradov, Viktor V. & Natalija Ju. Švedova, eds. 1964. Glagol, narečie, predlogi i sojuzy v russkom literaturnom jazyke XIX veka. Moscow: Nauka.
Wanner, Dieter. 2006.
The Power of Analogy
: An Essay on Historical Linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gonzalez-Trujillo, Ricardo & Ernesto Priego
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
