Introduction published In:
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:2] 2021
► pp. 209–213
Thematic section
Introduction to the special thematic section
Perspectives on alignment change
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 23 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21012.dah
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21012.dah
References (27)
Aldai, Gontzal. 2008. From
Ergative Case Marking to Semantic Case Marking: The Case of Historical
Basque. In Donohue & Wichmann (eds.) 2008, 197–218.
Aldridge, Edith. 2011. Antipassive
in Austronesian Alignment Change. Grammatical Change. Origins, Nature,
Outcomes (2012) ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 332–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2015. A
Minimalist Approach to the Emergence of Ergativity in Austronesian Languages. Linguistics
Vanguard 1:1.313–326.
. 2017. Intransitivity
and the Development of Ergative Alignment. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 501–529.
Butt, Miriam & Ashwini Deo. 2017. Developments
into and out of Ergativity: Indo-Aryan Diachrony. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 531–552.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coghill, Eleanor. 2016. The
Rise & Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic. Cycles of Alignment
Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coon, Jessica, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.). 2017. The
Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.). 2018.Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dahl, Eystein. 2016. The
Origin and Development of the Old Indo-Aryan Predicated -tá
Construction. In Dahl & Stroński (eds.) 2016a, 63–110.
(ed.). In
preparation. Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European
Family.
Dahl, Eystein & Krzysztof Stroński (eds.). 2016a. Indo-Aryan
Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic
Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann (eds.). 2008. The
Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gildea, Spike. 1997. Evolution
of Grammatical Relations in Cariban: How Functional Motivation Precedes Syntactic
Change. Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective ed.
by Talmy Givón, 155–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zuñiga. 2016. Referential Hierarchies: A New Look at Some Historical and Typological Patterns. Linguistics 54:3.483–529.
Haig, Geoffrey. 2017. Deconstructing
Iranian Ergativity. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 465–500.
Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case
in Semitic. Roles, Relations, and
Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law, Danny. 2017. Changes
to Alignment in Mayan Languages So Far. Paper presented at
the ICHL 23 workshop, Alignment Typology in Diachronic
Perspective, 4 August 2017.
Lehman, Thomas. 1998. Old
Tamil. The Dravidian Languages ed. by Sanford B. Steever, 75–99. London: Routledge.
Polinski, Maria. 2016. Deconstructing
Ergativity. Two Types of Ergative Languages and Their
Features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seržant, Ilja & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.). 2018. The
Diachrony of Differential Argument
Marking. Berlin: Language Science Press.
