Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp.349–388

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Productivity, richness, and diversity of light verb constructions in the history of American English

 | Purdue University
Published online: 8 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.19009.sun
Abstract
This study provides an empirical analysis of productivity in Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) in the history of American English. LVCs contain a semantically light verb like make or take that may be paired with an abstract nominal object, as in make an assumption or take charge. Using a 406-million word corpus of texts written between 1810 and 2009, we track the frequency of LVCs and analyze the range of light verb + nominal object pairings. Using statistical measurements of biodiversity from the field of ecology, we evaluate the hypothesis that “the rich get richer” among light verbs: the most frequent verbs become more frequent and more diverse, occurring with an ever-growing variety of different NP complements. The results contribute to ongoing discussions in cross-linguistic, diachronic research on reasons for the growth of LVCs, the gradient nature of linguistic productivity, and the role of exemplars in the interaction between type and token frequencies during periods of linguistic change.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Classification of LVCs
  • 3.Data collection
  • 4.Statistical analysis of LVCs
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Akimoto, Minoje & Laurel J. Brinton. 1999. The Origin of the Composite Predicate in Old English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoje Akimoto, 21–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albert, Réka & Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 741.47–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1995. Having a Look at the Expanded Predicate. The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description ed. by Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allerton, David J. 2003. Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald. 2009. Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 21 ed. by Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László. 2016. Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Approach. Lingua 121:1.60–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications. Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Johanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 1–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonial, Claire Nicole. 2014. Take a Look at This! Form, Function and Productivity of English Light Verb Constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonial, Claire, Julia Bonn, Kathryn Conger, Jena Hwang, Martha Palmer & Nicholas Reese. 2015. PropBank Annotation Guidelines. Center for Computational Language and Education Research: University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. Where Grammar and Lexis Meet: Composite Predicates in English. Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization ed. by Elena Seoane, María José López-Couso & Teresa Fanego, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner & Victor Kuperman. 2014. Concreteness Ratings for Forty-Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 46:3.904–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The Light Verb Jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 91.1–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away. Complex Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective ed. by Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2013. Diachronic Pertinacity of Light Verbs. Lingua 1351.7–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:1.425–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language 82:4.711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & David Eddington. 2006. A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming’. Language 82:2.323–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Steve. 2002. Skousen’s Analogical Approach as an Exemplar-Categorization. Analogical Modeling ed. by Royal Skousen & Deryle B. Parkinson, 51–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Wei-Te, Claire Bonial & Martha Palmer. 2015. English Light Verb Construction Identification Using Lexical Knowledge. Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. URL: [URL]
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-Word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1995. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William A. Croft. 1997. Productivity and Schematicity in Metaphors. Cognitive Science 21:3.247–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English. URL: [URL]
Fazly, Afsaneh. 2007. Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge about Multiword Predicates. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. URL: [URL].
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck. 2002. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16:3.235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gárate, Teresa Moralejo. 2003. Composite Predicates in Middle English. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2017. Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives ed. by Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, R. 1999. Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laural Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011. Indian English: An Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-Derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 129:3–4.258–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, L. 2001. Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken . Studia Neophilologica 731:143–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott. 2013. Capturing the Diversity in Lexical Diversity. Language Learning 631:87–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech Perception without Speaker Normalization: An Exemplar Model. Talker Variability in Speech Processing ed. by Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein. 1997. Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Doctoral Thesis, Essex University, England.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2002. Light Verbs in English. URL: [URL]
Koplenig, Alexander. 2015. Using the Parameters of the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law to Measure Diachronic, Lexical, Syntactical, and Stylistic Changes: A Large-Scale Corpus Analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1.1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krenn, Brigitte. 2000. The Usual Suspects: Data-Oriented Models for Identification and Representation of Lexical Collocations. Doctoral Dissertation, Saarland University, Saarbrücken (Germany).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunegis, Jérôme, Marcel Blattner & Christine Moser. 2013. Preferential Attachment in Online Networks: Measurement and Explanations. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 205–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1999. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Verbs in Early Modern English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laporte, Samantha. 2017. Light Verb Constructions in Second-Language Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Nativization in Hong Kong English. Paper presented at Light Verb Constructions in Germanic Languages, Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles, November 2017.
Live, Anna H. 1973. The Take-Have Phrasal in English. Linguistics 951.31–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magurran, Anne. 2013. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Meiko. 1999. Composite Predicates in Middle English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, David. 2015. Type-Token Models: A Comparative Study. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 22:1.1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1988. Similarity, Frequency, and Category Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 141.54–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ninio, Anat. 1999. Pathbreaking Verbs in Syntactic Development and the Question of Prototypical Transitivity. Journal of Child Language 261.619–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
North, Ryan. 2005. Computational Measures of the Acceptability of Light Verb Constructions. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert. 2017. A Distributional Semantic Approach to the Periodization of Change in the Productivity of Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 221.490–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specific Phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner, 101–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigney, Daniel. 2010. The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Light Verb Constructions in the History of English. Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns ed. by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte, 15–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia & Gerold Schneider. 2015. Determining Light Verb Constructions in Contemporary British and Irish English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 201.326–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shahrokny-Prehn, Arian & Silke Höche. 2011. Rising through the Registers: A Corpus-based Account of the Stylistic Constraints on Light Verb Constructions. Corpus 101.239–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1840. A Defence of Poetry. Essays, Letters from Abroad, Translations and Fragments ed. by Mary Shelley, 1–57. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevenson, Suzanne, Afsaneh Fazly & Ryan North. 2004. Statistical Measures of the Semi-Productivity of Light Verb Constructions. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Integrating Processing, 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2018. A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:3.260–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sundquist, J. D. 2020. The Rich Get Richer: Preferential Attachment and the Diachrony of Light Verbs in Old Swedish. Historical Linguistics 2017 ed. by Bridget Drinka, 344–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suttle, Laura & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction. Linguistics 49:6.1237–1269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanabe, Harumi. 1999. Composite Predicates and Phrasal Verbs in the Paston Letters. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 87–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999. A Historical Overview of Complex Predicate Types. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tu, Yuancheng & Dan Roth. 2011. Learning English Light Verb Constructions: Contextual or Statistical. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: from Parsing and Generation to the Real World, 31–39. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tweedie, Fiona J. & R. Harald Baayen. 1998. How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32:5.323–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Feltgen, Quentin
2025. Testing diachronic measures of productivity using the Zipf-Mandelbrot law. In Mathematical Modelling in Linguistics and Text Analysis [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 370], ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Feltgen, Quentin
2025. Productivity in Language Change. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Ong, Christina Sook Beng & Hajar Abdul Rahim
2025.  Give, take, and make light verb constructions in mesolectal Malaysian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 46:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Giparaitė, Judita
2024. A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English. Kalbotyra 76 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
SUNDQUIST, JOHN D.
2022. An exemplar-based approach to composite predicates in the history of American English. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue