Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.87–110

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Homorganic Cluster Lengthening, Pre-Cluster Shortening and Preference-based change in Early English

 | Arizona State University
Published online: 25 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.18028.kru
Abstract
This paper discusses the processes of Homorganic Cluster Lengthening (HCL) and Pre-Cluster Shortening (PCS) occurring in the late Old English and Early Middle English periods. These processes are responsible, respectively, for vowel-lengthening before voiced homorganic consonant clusters (OE bindan, feld, hund > LOE/EME bīnd, fēld, hūnd) and vowel shortening before other clusters (OE cēpte, fīfta, brōhte > ME kepte, fifte, brohte). This paper builds on reassessments of data by Minkova, Donka. 2014. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar to contribute an account of HCL within the system of “preference laws” articulated by Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. This account attributes the motivation for HCL to preferences for syllable-internal transitions between nucleus and coda in order to explain the fine details of HCL; namely, the fact that HCL applies with higher frequency to high vowels followed nasals than to low/mid vowels and in a sporadic manner to front vowels followed by /l/ compared to back vowels. These differences are attributed to the application of the Coda and Nucleus Laws (Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar: 25, 42), with additional proposals about the effect of velarization of /l/ in Old English, with comparison to PCS providing important context throughout.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Homorganic Cluster Lengthening
    • 2.2Pre-Cluster Shortening (PCS)
    • 2.3Summary
  • 3.Prior accounts
    • 3.1Optimal syllable weight and compensatory lengthening
    • 3.2Direct phonetic motivations
    • 3.3Syllable cut
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Major proposals
    • 4.1Preference-based change
    • 4.2Preferability of HCL contexts
    • 4.3Application to HCL
    • 4.4Application to VCCC contexts
    • 4.5What about Pre-Cluster Shortening?
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (35)
References
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eliason, Norman E.. 1948. Old English Vowel Lengthening and Vowel Shortening before Consonant Groups. Studies in Philology 451.1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M.. 1992. A Grammar of Old English: Vol I. Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B.. 1976. An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, Robert B.. 1991. Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Daniel. 2008. Velars and Processes: Their Treatment in Phonological Theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krupatkin, Y. B. 1970. From Germanic to English and Frisian. Us Wurk 19:3.49–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1972. Manner of Articulation, Parallel Processing, and the Perception of Duration. Working Papers Linguistics and Computer and Information Science Research Center, Ohio State University 121.33–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly. 1992. Vowel Lengthening before Resonant + Another Consonant and Svarabhakti in Germanic. On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 68) ed. by I. Rauch, G. F. Carr & R. L. Kyes, 163–215. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1898. Beiträge zur Englischen Grammatik III. Die Quantitätsveränderungen im Lauf der englischen Sprachentwicklung. Anglia 201.335–362.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1914–1940. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Leipzig [Repr. 1921. Stuttgart: Tauchnitz].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika. 1986. The Syllabic Basis of Word Division in Old English Manuscripts. English Studies 671.193–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert. 2009. Thoughts on the Genesis and the Development of Syllable Cut in English. Anglia 1271.261–282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert, David Restle & Theo Vennemann. 2015. Preference Laws in Phonological Change. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology ed. by J. Salmons & P. Honeybone, 450–466. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malsch, Derry L. 1976. Syllable, Mora, and Length in the Development of English. Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Historical Linguistics ed. by W. M. Christie, 83–93. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2014. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka & Robert P. Stockwell. 1992. Homorganic Clusters as Moric Busters in the History of English: The Case of -ld, -nd, -mb. History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics ed. by M. T. Rissanen, O. Ihalainen, T. Nevalainen, and I. Taavitsainen, 191–207. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moon, An-Nah. 2004. Constraints on Homorganic Cluster Lengthening in Early English: A Unified Account of Vowel Lengthening and Shortening. Language Research 40:2.353–376.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morsbach, Lorenz. 1888. Ueber den Ursprung der neuenglischen Schriftsprache. Heilbroon: Henniager.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 2000. Syllable Cut Prosody in Early Middle English. Language 761.617–654. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. & Theo Vennemann. 1982. Syllable Contact Change in Germanic, Greek and Sidamo. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 81.321–349.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language 591.514–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the Sonority Hierarchy. University of Massachusetts, Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. 1981. The Phonetic Basis of a Late Old English Sound Change. Phonologica 1980 ed. by W. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer & J. R. Rennison, 337–341. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Constraints on Syllables and Quantitative Changes in Early English. Linguistics 211.879–895.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prokosch, E. 1939. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. University of Pennsylvania: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Restle, David. 2003. Silbenschnitt – Quantität – Kopplung: Zur Geschichte, Charakterisierung und Typologie der Anschlußprosodie. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 1994. Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1901. Grundzüge der Phonetik: Zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Haertel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smirnitsky, A. I. 1946. Problems of Phonology in the History of the English Language (Russian). Vestnik MGU 21.81–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolaj. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. From Quantity to Syllable Cuts: On So-called Lengthening in the Germanic Languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics 121.251–282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry C. 1929. A Short History of English. 3rd ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Minkova, Donka
2025. Historical Phonology. In The New Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Page, B. Richard
2024. Homorganic lengthening in late Old English revisited. In Investigating West Germanic Languages [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 8], ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue