Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.169–191
Imperfect language learning vs. dynamic sound change
The shift [i]>[e] in the verbal template hifʕil in Modern Hebrew
Published online: 27 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17023.res
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17023.res
Abstract
Modern Hebrew provides an idiosyncratic case for historical linguistic study: due to the discontinuity of its use as a spoken
language, differences between contemporary structures and classical ones do not necessarily reflect change processes, but may
instead result from imperfect language learning by the original L2 speakers of Modern Hebrew at the initial stages of speech
revival. This article offers a new research direction for delineating the boundaries between the two types of phenomena based on
the recent discovery of two collections of recordings of spontaneous Hebrew speech made in the 1960s. Focusing on one conspicuous
sound change in contemporary Modern Hebrew, namely the transition from [i] to [e] in the prefix of the verbal pattern
hif’il, we show that the variability in contemporary language between hif’il and
hef’il has two distinct sources: (i) an initial state of variability between [i] and [e] in forms derived
from weak root verbs (initial-[n] and middle-[w/y] roots, e.g. higi’a-hegi’a ‘arrived’) due to imperfect language
learning in the initial phases of the formation of Modern Hebrew; and (ii) a recent change from [i] to [e] in forms derived from
regular roots (e.g. hitxil-hetxil ‘started’). In this category, the 1960s recordings attest to a stable
realization of [i] amongst all age groups, with deviations from the rules of traditional Hebrew grammar occurring only marginally.
Based on this data, the measure of synchronic variation documented in the 1960s recordings is analyzed as a precursor of the sound
change that developed in the language at a later stage.
Article outline
- 1.Linguistic change in spoken Modern Hebrew
- 2.The research question
- 3.Phonology, morphology, and changes in the morphophonological system of Hebrew
- 4.The verbal template hifʕil
- 5.The research corpus
- 6.The data
- 6.1Weak root verbs
- 6.2Regular roots
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Note
References
References (54)
Berman, Ruth A. 1975. Morphological Realization of Syntactic Processes in the Verb System. Hebrew Computational Linguistics Bulletin 91.25–39.
Blanc, Haim. 1964. Israeli Hebrew Texts. Studies in Egyptology and Linguistics in Honor of H. J. Polotsky ed. by Haiim B. Rosén, 132–152. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.
Bolozky, Shmuel. 1997. Israeli Hebrew Phonology. Phonologies of Asia and Africa, Vol. 1 ed. by Alan S. Kaye & Peter T. Daniels, 287–311. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
. 1999. On the Special Status of the Vowels ‘a’ and ‘e’ in Israeli Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 401.233–250.
. 2002. Phonological and Morphological Variation in Spoken Hebrew. Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the Spoken Language and in Linguistic Variation in Israel ed. by Shlomo Izre’el, 239–278. (=
Te’uda, XVIII.) Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.
. 2007. Centralization of the Vowel i in Colloquial Hebrew. Sha’arei Lashon: Studies in Hebrew, Aramaic and Jewish Languages Presented to Moshe Bar-Asher, Vol. 31 ed. by Aharon Maman, Shmuel E. Fassberg & Yochanan Breuer, 51–54. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.
Cohen, Chaim E. 2012. ‘Hebrew is Spoken Here’: The Type of Hebrew Taught in the Set of Records. In Shlomo Izre’el, ed., 212–236.
Doron, Edit. 2003. Agency and Voice: The Semantics of the Semitic Templates. Natural Language Semantics 111.1–67.
. 2016. Introduction. Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew ed. by Edit Doron, 1–22. (=
Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics, 84.) Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Elman, Jeffrey L. & James L. McClelland. 1986. Exploiting Lawful Variability in the Speech Wave. Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes ed. by Joseph S. Perkell & Dennis H. Klatt, 360–380. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1996. Hebrew as a Living Semitic Language. Evolution and Revival: Trends in the Development of the Hebrew Language, 148–168. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Gonen, Einat. 2013. Corpus Linguistics and Challenges in Researching Colloquial Hebrew. Hebrew – A Living Language 61.63–83.
. 2015. Grammatical Variation in Israeli Hebrew in the Light of the Formation of Early Modern Hebrew. Language Studies 161.121–138.
. Forthcoming. Language Change, Prescriptive Language, and Spontaneous Speech in Modern Hebrew: A Corpus-Based Study of Early Recordings. Linguistic Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew ed. by Edit Doron, Malka Rapoport-Hovav, Yael Reshef & Moshe Taube. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gonen, Einat & Yael Reshef. 2016. The Verbal System in the Early 1960s: An Analysis of Recordings of Three Hebrew Speakers. Hebrew – A Living Language 71.57–80.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2012. ‘Hebrew is Spoken Here’: Here and Not There. A Linguistic Analysis of the Recorded Language. In Shlomo Izre’el, ed., 237–283.
, ed. 2012. The Speech Machine as a Language Teacher: Hebrew is Spoken Here. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.
Joüon, Paul & Takamitsu Muraoka. 1993. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.
Kuzar, Ron. 2001. Hebrew and Zionism: A Discourse Analytic Cultural Study (=
Language, Power and Social Process 5). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McCarthy, John J. 2006. The Phonetics and Phonology of Semitic Pharyngeal. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form ed. by Patricia A. Keating, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1999. The Revival and the Oral Legacy of Hebrew: Some Observations. Jewish Studies at the Turn of the 20th Century: Proceedings of the 6th EAJS Congress, Toledo, July 1998 ed. By Targarona Borras, Judith & Angel Saenz-Badillos, 3–11. Leiden: Brill.
Neuman, Yishai. 2004. Why is the hireq Disappearing from the Verbal Template hifʕil?
. Haaretz, 4 November.
Ohala, John J. 1989. Sound Change is Drawn from a Pool of Synchronic Variation. Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes ed. by Leiv E. Breivik & Ernst H. Jahr, 173–198. (=
Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 43.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Pariente, Itsik. 2015. The Interaction of Vowel Quality and Pharyngeals in Sephardic Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 49:2.421–438.
Reshef, Yael. 2012a. The Linguistic Character of Early Spoken Hebrew. In Shlomo Izre’el, ed., 188–211.
. 2012b. The Re-Emergence of Hebrew as a National Language. The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook ed. by Stefan Weninger, Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck & Janet C. E. Watson, 546–554. (=
Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationeswissenschaft, 36.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2013a. ‘The Language that Follows Speech will not be the Same as the One that Preceded It’: Spoken Hebrew in the Pre-State Period. Journal of Jewish Studies 641.157–186.
Reshef, Yael & Einat Gonen. 2016. Linguistic Variation in the Early Layers of Modern Hebrew: Vacillation in the Transition from Written to Spoken Usage. Carmillim 121.151–166.
. Forthcoming. Ashkenazi Traits in Early 1960s Recordings of Spoken Hebrew. Massorot 191.
Rosenblum, Amalia & Zvi Triger. 2007. Speechless – How Contemporary Israeli Culture is Reflected in Language. Or-Yehuda: Dvir.
Rosenthal, Ruvik. 2007. On the Future of Hebrew: Five Areas of Concern. The Hebrew Language in the Era of Globalization ed. by Nava Nevo & Elite Olshtain, 179–191. (=
Studies in Jewish Education, 12.) Jerusalem: Magnes.
Rubin, Aaron. 2001. A Note on the Conjugation of Lamed-He Verbs in the Derived Patterns. Zeitschrift für Althebraistik 141:34–42.
Sáenz-Badillos, Angel. 1993. A History of the Hebrew Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwarzwald, Ora R. 1977. The Weak Verb Representation in the Modern Hebrew Lexicon. Hebrew Computational Linguistics 121.25–36.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Izre’el, Shlomo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
