Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.111–135
From locative existential construction fi(ih) to a TMA/progressive marker
Grammaticalization of fi(ih) in Gulf Arabic Pidgin
Published online: 25 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.16026.mob
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.16026.mob
Abstract
The grammaticalization framework has been suggested as a predictive power for language change. This paper considers the grammatical functions of the locative construction fi(ih) in the Gulf Arabic Pidgin (a variety spoken by workers from the Indian subcontinent and south Asian countries working in the Arabian/Persian Gulf States). In Gulf Arabic, there are (1) the preposition fi ‘in; into; inside’ and (2) the locative construction fi(ih) ‘there is/are’, which only has an existential function. In Gulf Arabic Pidgin, the locative construction fi(ih), however, has several grammatical functions, including (1) a possessive marker (i.e., have-constructions), (2) an equative/predicative copula, and (3) a preverbal predicative marker. The aim in this paper is two-fold: first, to show how a grammaticalization framework can possibly account for the grammatical innovations of fi(ih) in the Gulf Arabic Pidgin; and second, to suggest that these grammatical innovations might be the results of an ongoing grammaticalization process of LOCATIVE>TMA/PROGRESSIVE. Earlier studies conducted on this pidgin serve as data sources for this project.
Keywords: grammaticalization, language change, innovation, Gulf Arabic Pidgin
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1What is a pidgin?
- 2.2Gulf Arabic Pidgin (GAP)
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 3.1Grammaticalization
- 3.2Grammaticalization in contact situations (linguistics)
- 4.Fi(ih) in Gulf Arabic Pidgin (GAP)
- 5.The data, procedures, and analysis
- 6.Functions and examples of fi(ih) in GAP
- 6.1The use of fi(ih) as a preposition with a locative function meaning ‘in’ (GA and GAP)
- 6.2As an existential fi(ih) (GA and GAP)
- 6.3As an equative/predicative copula (GAP innovation)
- 6.4A syntactic tool to achieve verbal predication (GAP innovation)
- 6.5In predicative possessive constructions (have-constructions; GAP innovation)
- 7.Fi(ih) in GAP: Gradual grammaticalization/grammaticalization chain
- 8.Conclusion
- Note
- Abbreviations
References
References (36)
Al-Azraqi, M. 2010. Pidginisation in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Media Presentation. Arabic and the Media: Linguistic Analyses and Applications ed. by R. Bassiouney, 159–173. Leiden: Brill.
Albakrawi, H. 2012. The Linguistic Effect of Foreign Asian Workers on the Arabic Pidgin in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 2:9.127–133.
Almoaily, M. 2008. A Data-Based Description of Urdu Pidgin Arabic. Master’s Thesis, Newcastle University.
2014. Language Variation in Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters ed. by I. Buchstaller, A. Holmberg & M. Almoaily, 57–83. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bakir, M. J. 2010. Notes on the Verbal System of Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 25:2.201–228.
Bruyn, A. 2009. Grammaticalization in Creoles Ordinary and Not-So-Ordinary Cases. Studies in Language 33:2.312–337.
Bybee, J. & O. Dahl. 1989. The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World. Studies in Language 131.51–103.
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Esseesy, M. 2010. Grammaticalization of Arabic Prepositions and Subordinators: A Corpus-Based Study. Leiden: Brill.
van Gelderen, E. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2008. Where did Late Merge Go? Grammaticalization as Feature Economy. Studia Linguistica 62:3.287–300.
Heine, B. 1992. Grammaticalization Chains. Studies in Language 16:2.335–368.
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2003. On Contact-Induced Grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27:3.529–572.
Hobrom, A. 1996. An Analysis of the Arabic Pidgin Spoken by Indian Workers in Saudi Arabia. Master’s Thesis, University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS (USA).
Hopper, P. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. Approaches to Grammaticalization ed. by E. Traugott & B. Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jahr, E. 2003. The Emergence of a TMA Grammatical Device in a Stable Pidgin: The Russenorsk Preverbal po Construction. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18:1.121–130.
Matthews, S. & V. Yip. 2009. Contact-Induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition. Studies in Language 33:2.366–395.
Mensah, E. 2012. Grammaticalization in Nigerian Pidgin. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura 17:2.167–179.
Michaelis, S., P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber. 2013. Introduction. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (vol. 11) ed. by S. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath, & M. Huber, xxi–xxiii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Næss, U. G. 2008. “Gulf Pidgin Arabic”: Individual Strategies or a Structured Variety? Master’s Thesis, University of Oslo.
Parkvall, M. & P. Bakker. 2013. Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide ed. by P. Bakker & Y. Matras, 15–64. Boston & Berlin: de Gruyter.
Smart, J. R. 1990. Pidginization in Gulf Arabic: A First Report. Anthropological Linguistics 32:1–2.83–119.
Tagliamonte, S. 2000. The Story of kom in Nigerian Pidgin English. Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles 211.353–382.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Versteegh, Kees
2022. Marking statements of fact in early pidgins. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 37:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
