Article published In: Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2011) ► pp.48–76
On predicting contact-induced grammatical change
Evidence from Slavic languages
Published online: 27 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.1.1.03nom
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.1.1.03nom
For good reasons, linguists are highly skeptical when it comes to predicting linguistic change. As has been argued in Heine (2003: 598–599), based on observations on some regularities of grammatical change made within the framework of grammaticalization theory, however, it seems possible to propose at least some probabilistic predictions on what is a possible grammatical change and what is not. In the present article it is argued that this also applies to grammatical change that takes place in situations of language contact. As more recent research has demonstrated (Heine & Kuteva 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, Heine forthcoming), contact-induced grammatical change is essentially subject to the same principles of grammaticalization as grammatical change not induced by contact. The data analyzed in this article concern case marking in Slavic languages, more specifically expressions for comitative and instrumental participants.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Janda, Richard D.
Danylenko, Andrii
2015. On the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of comitative and instrumental categories in Slavic. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Danylenko, Andrii
Ziegeler, Debra
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
