Cover not available

Introduction published In: Understanding language genealogy: Alternatives to the tree model
Edited by Siva Kalyan, Alexandre François and Harald Hammarström
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1] 2019
► pp. 1–8

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
Introduction

Problems with, and alternatives to, the tree model in historical linguistics

 | Australian National University
 | LaTTiCe (CNRS; ENS-PSL; Paris 3-USPC) | Australian National University
 | Uppsala University


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.00005.kal
References (39)
References
Baum, David A. & Stacey D. Smith. 2013. Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2006. Another Look at Australia as a Linguistic Area. Linguistic Areas ed. by Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent, 244–265. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, David, Flavia Filimon & Russell D. Gray. 2005. Untangling Our Past: Languages, Trees, Splits and Networks. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: Phylogenetic Approaches ed. by Ruth Mace, Clare J. Holden & Stephen Shennan, 69–85. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2001. Language Contact and Areal Diffusion in Sinitic Languages. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics ed. by Alexandra Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon, 328–357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1959. Statistical Measurement of Linguistic Relationship. Language 35:2.131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, Gerhard, Martin-Dietrich Gleßgen, Christian Schmitt & Wolfgang Schweickard. 2009. Romanische Sprachgeschichte – Ein internationales Handbuch zur Geschichte der romanischen Sprachen/Histoire linguistique de la Romania – Manuel international d’histoire linguistique de la Romania. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, 161–189. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Méthode comparative et chaînages linguistiques: Pour un modèle diffusionniste en généalogie des langues. Diffusion: implantation, affinités, convergence ed. by Jean-Léo Léonard, 43–82. (= Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, xxiv .) Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geraghty, Paul A. 1983. The History of the Fijian Languages (= Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 19.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, Morris, John Czelusniak, G. William Moore, A. E. Romero-Herrera & Genji Matsuda. 1979. Fitting the Gene Lineage into its Species Lineage: A Parsimony Strategy Illustrated by Cladograms Constructed from Globin Sequences. Systematic Biology 28:2.132–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. & Russell D. Gray. 2009. Austronesian Language Phylogenies: Myths and Misconceptions About Bayesian Computational Methods. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Andrew K. Pawley, 1–23. (= Pacific Linguistics, 601.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantarō J. 1992. Hakka in Wellentheorie Perspective. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 201.1–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics, Second Edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holton, Gary. 2011. A Geo-Linguistic Approach to Understanding Relationships Within the Athabaskan Family. Paper presented at Language in Space: Geographic Perspectives on Language Diversity and Diachrony, Boulder, Colorado, USA, June 23–24, 2011.
Huehnergard, John & Aaron Rubin. 2011. Phyla and Waves: Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages. Semitic Languages: An International Handbook ed. by Stefan Weninger, Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck & Janet C. E. Watson, 259–278. (= Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 36.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurles, Matthew E., Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith, Russell D. Gray & David Penny. 2003. Untangling Oceanic Settlement: The Edge of the Knowable. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:10.531–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the Comparative Method from the Tree Model: A Framework for Historical Glottometry. Let’s Talk about Trees: Problems in Representing Phylogenic Relationships Among Languages ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 59–89. (= Senri Ethnological Studies, 98.) Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korn, Agnes. Forthcoming. Isoglosses and Subdivisions of Iranian. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:3.
Krauss, Michael E. & Victor Golla. 1981. Northern Athapaskan Languages. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 6: Subarctic ed. by June Helm & William C. Sturtevant, 67–85. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. & C. Douglas Chrétien. 1937. Quantitative Classification of Indo-European Languages. Language 13:2.83–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maddison, Wayne P. 1997. Gene Trees in Species Trees. Systematic Biology 46:3.523–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magidow, Alexander. 2013. Towards a Sociohistorical Reconstruction of Pre-Islamic Arabic Dialect Diversity. University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe & Tandy Warnow. 2005. Perfect Phylogenetic Networks: A New Methodology for Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Natural Languages. Language 81:2.382–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1999. Chasing Rainbows: Implications of the Rapid Dispersal of Austronesian Languages for Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-Kuei Li, 95–138. (= Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics: Academia Sinica, 1.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph John. 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 1998. The Germanic Languages. The Indo-European Languages ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paolo Ramat, 380–414. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and Computational Cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100:1.59–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1997. Social Networks and Kinds of Speech-Community Event. Archaeology and Language I: Theoretical and Methodological Orientations ed. by Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs, 209–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1853. Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur ed. by Johann Gustav Droysen & G. W. Nitzsch, 786–787. Braunschweig: C. A. Schwestchke & Sohn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1873. Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft: Offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Häckel, o. Professor der Zoologie und Director des zoologischen Museums an der Universität Jena, Second Edition. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrader, Otto. 1883. Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte: linguistisch-historische Beiträge zur Erforschung des indogermanischen Altertums. Jena: Hermann Costenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1900. Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten. Probe-Vorlesung, gehalten zu Leipzig am 30. April 1870. Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Southworth, Franklin C. 1964. Family-Tree Diagrams. Language 40:4.557–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Matthew. 2009. From Linguistic to Sociolinguistic Reconstruction: The Kamta Historical Subgroup of Indo-Aryan. (= Pacific Linguistics, 604.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Power, Justin M., David Quinto‐Pozos & Danny Law
2025. Advances in the Historical Linguistics of Signed Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 19:6 DOI logo
Matthias Urban
2024. The Oxford Guide to the Languages of the Central Andes, DOI logo
Syrjänen, Kaj, Luke Maurits, Unni Leino, Terhi Honkola, Jadranka Rota & Outi Vesakoski
2021. Crouching TIGER, hidden structure: Exploring the nature of linguistic data using TIGER values. Journal of Language Evolution 6:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue