Article published In: Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 6:1 (2025) ► pp.113–145
The complicated terrain of editorial peer review in Anglocentric global academic publishing
Editors’ roles and practices in the semi-periphery
Published online: 4 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25006.she
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25006.she
Abstract
The purpose of editorial peer review is to maintain and improve
academic journal quality while its execution depends on journal status and
location in the global academic publishing system. Significant research on
authors’ publishing experiences has been conducted in ERPP. However, empirical
research on the perspectives of multilingual editors beyond the Anglophone
center of scholarly publishing is an under-researched area. Therefore, to better
understand editors’ challenges and roles and investigate pedagogical activity at
journals in the “semi-periphery,” five English-medium national journals in
Taiwan were investigated. Data from qualitative interviews with five editors
were triangulated with journal and database data. A taxonomy of editor
challenges and roles along journal development stages is presented. Results show
that the type and intensity of editors’ challenges shift with publication
development. Oversight entities imposing Anglophone center norms have
standardized peer review practices enabling journal mobility. However,
collisions between those mechanisms and journal conditions can frustrate editors
and limit their ability to follow the standards, let alone execute explicit
pedagogical activities. This study reveals the complicated terrain for editors
beyond the Anglophone center and provides insights into the intersection of
journal development and editor roles cultivated through movement along the
global academic continuum toward mobility.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conceptual framework
- 2.1A critical perspective of global academic publishing
- 2.2Theoretical concepts: Mobility, indexical scales, and centering institutions
- 2.3The journal continuum
- 3.Relevant literature on peer review and editors
- 3.1Editor roles
- 3.2Editors as educators in the semi-periphery
- 4.The study
- 4.1The Taiwan context in relation to the world system
- 4.2The Taiwan context in relation to GAP
- 4.3The author’s context in GAP: Researcher positionality
- 4.4Research questions
- 5.Method
- 5.1Participants and data collection
- 5.2Analysis
- 5.3Saturation
- 6.Results
- 6.1RQ1: What challenges do editors face at various stages of journal
development?
- 6.1.1New: Struggling along a bumpy road
- 6.1.2Becoming: Establishing guardrails
- 6.1.3Stable: Climbing a mountain road
- 6.1.4Established: Toward a distant peak
- 6.2RQ2: What roles do editors adopt in their execution of editorial peer
review?
- 6.2.1Super-supporter
- 6.2.2Facilitator-pragmatist
- 6.2.3Facilitator-advocate
- 6.2.4Mentor-supporter
- 6.2.5Standard-bearer
- 6.1RQ1: What challenges do editors face at various stages of journal
development?
- 7.Discussion
- 7.1Taxonomy
- 7.2Two collisions
- 7.3Editors
- 8.Conclusion
- 8.1Limitations and future research
- 8.2Recommendations
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (66)
Abusalim, A. (2021). ERPP
practices in the Arab world: One language, different
problems. Journal of English for Research
Publication
Purposes, 2(1), 30–61.
Adamson, J., & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2015). “I
was in their shoes”: Shifting Perceptions of Editorial Roles and
Responsibilities. English Scholarship Beyond
Borders, 1(1), 109–142.
(2016). Sustaining
Reviewing Quality: Induction, Mentoring, and
Community. English Scholarship Beyond
Borders, 2(1), 29–57.
Adamson, J., & Muller, T. (2012). Editorial
investigation of roles and responsibilities in academic journal editorial
systems. In J. L . Adamson & R. Nunn (Eds.), Editorial
and authorial voices in EFL academic journal
publishing (pp. 123–169). Asian EFL Journal Press.
Adamson, J., Muller, T., Martins, C., Hann, N., & Nunn, R. C. (2021). Journal
editors’ perceptions of academic publishing outside major publishing
house. English Scholarship Beyond
Borders, 7(2), 59–88.
Bal, M. (2018). Let’s
Abolish the Peer-Review System. Media
Theory. Retrieved September
12,2018, from [URL]
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking
acceptance in an English-only research
world. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 161, 1–12.
Bennett, K. (2014). Introduction:
The political and economic infrastructure of academic practice: The
‘semiperiphery’ as a category for social and linguistic
analysis. In K. Bennett (Ed.), The
semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and
practices (pp. 1–9). Palgrave Macmillan.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The
sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Braine, G. (2003). Negotiating
the gatekeepers: The journey of an academic
article. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing
for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language
Education (pp. 73–90). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chou, C. P. (Ed.). (2014a). The
SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global
phenomenon. Sense Publishers.
Consortium, P. R. (2016). Peer
review survey 2015. [URL]
Corcoran, J. (2019). Addressing
the “Bias Gap”: A Research-Driven Argument for Critical Support of
Plurilingual Scientists’ Research
Writing. Written
Communication, 36(4), 538–577.
Deji, O. F. (2012). Gender
and rural development (Vol. 2: Advanced
studies). Lit verlag GmbH & Co. KG Wien.
Donovan, S. K. (2011). Big
journals, small journals, and the two peer
reviews. Journal of Scholarly
Publishing, 42(4), 534–538. [URL].
Englander, K., & Uzuner-Smith, S. (2013). The
role of policy in constructing the peripheral scientist in the era of
globalization. Language
Policy, 121, 231–250.
Flowerdew, J., & Habibe, P. (2022). Introducing
English for research and publication
purposes. Routledge.
Gonzales, L. D., & Núñez, A.-M. (2014). The
Ranking Regime and the Production of Knowledge: Implications for Academia
[Article]. Regime de Classificação e produção
de conhecimento: implicações para a
Universidade, 22(26/34), 1–20.
Habibe, P. (2019). To
be Native or Not to be Native: That is Not the
Question. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice
writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors,
gatekeepers (pp. 39–52). Palgrave Macmillan.
Habibe, P., & Hultgren, A. K. (Eds.). (2022). The
inner world of gatkeeping in scholarly
publishing. Palgrave Macmillan. (eBook).
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion
work, feeling rules, and social
structure. American Journal of
Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
Hyland, K. (2022). The
scholarly publishing
landscape. In M. Z. C. Hanganu-Bresch, G. Cutrufello, & S. Maci (Eds.), Routledge
Handbook of Scientific
Communication (pp. 15–25). Routledge.
Josephs, K. B. (2016). Handling
with care: On editing, invisibility, and affective
labor. Small axe: a journal of
criticism, 20(2), 98–105.
Labassi, T. (2009). Periphery
non-Anglophone scholarship in English-only journals: Conditions of a better
visibility. Changing
English, 16(2), 247–254.
Lawless, B. (2018). Documenting
a labor of love: emotional labor as academic
labor. Review of
Communication, 18(2), 85–97.
Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish
(in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a
Korean university. Language
Policy, 121, 215–230.
Lillis, T. (2012). Economies
of signs in writing for academic publication: The case of English medium
“national” journals. Journal of Advanced
Composition, 32(3–4), 695–722.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic
writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in
English. Routledge.
Lillis, T., Magyar, A., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2013). Putting
‘wordface’ work at the centre of academic text production: working with an
international journal to develop an authors’ mentoring
programme. In V. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting
Research
Writing (pp. 237–255). Chandos Publishing.
Lundin, R. A., Jönsson, S., Kreiner, K., & Tienari, J. (2010). The
changing face of academic publishing: On the past, present and future of the
Scandinavian Journal of
Management. Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 26(3), 309–317. [URL].
MacGregor, K. (2022, March 12). Higher
education report charts rise of the Global
South. University World
News. [URL]
Marušić, A. (2013). First
foreword. In V. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting
Research
Writing (pp. xv–xvii). Chandos Publishing.
Marušić, A., Lukić, I. K., Marušić, M., McNamee, D., Sharp, D., & Horton, R. (2002). Peer
Review in a Small and a Big Medical Journal: Case Study of the Croatian
Medical Journal and The Lancet. Croatian
Medical
Journal, 431, 286–289.
Marušić, A., & Marušić, M. (1999). Small
Scientific Journals from Small Countries: Breaking from a Vicious Circle of
Inadequacy. Croatian Medical
Journal, 40(4), 508–514.
Marušić, M., & Marušić, A. (2014). The
Croatian Medical Journal: Success and
consequences. In K. Bennett (Ed.), The
semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and
practices (pp. 210–220). Palgrave Macmillan.
Marušić, M., Misak, A., Kljakovic-Gaspic, M., Fister, K., Hren, D., & Marušić, A. (2004). Producing
a scientific journal in a small scientific community: An author-helpful
policy. International
Microbiology, 71, 143–147.
McKay, S. L. (2003). Reflections
on being a
gatekeeper. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing
for Scholarly Publication: Behind the Scenes in Language
Education (pp. 91–102). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mišak, A., Marušić, M., & Marušić, A. (2005). Manuscript
editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small
scientific journal. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 14(2), 122–131.
Mok, K.-H. (2014). Promoting
the global university in Taiwan: University governance reforms and academic
reflections. In C. P. Chou (Ed.), The
SSCI syndrome in higher education: A local or global
phenomenon (pp. 1–24). Sense Publishers.
OECD. (2023). Main
Science and Technology Indicators (MSTI database) [URL]
Pemberton, M. A. (2022). Gatekeeper,
guardian, or guide? Negotiating the dynamics of power as an
editor. In G. Giberson, M. Schoen, & C. Weisser (Eds.), Behind
the curtain of scholarly publishing: Editors in writing
studies (pp. 139–152). Utah State University Press.
Petrić, B. (2014). English-medium
journals in Serbia: Editors’
perspectives. In K. Bennett (Ed.), The
semiperiphery of academic writing: discourses, communities and
practices (pp. 189–209). Palgrave Macmillan.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific
publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the
future. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 7(2), 121–132. [URL].
Scanlan, S. (2013). A
Brief Introduction on Peer Review: New
Possibilities. NANO: New American Notes
Online (3). [URL]
SCImago. (n.d.). SCImago
Journal & Country Rank
[Portal]. Retrieved October,
19 from [URL]
Shaw, O. (2022). Mediation
and uptake in manuscript revision. Journal of
English for Research Publication
Purposes, 3(1), 6–28.
Sheridan, C. L. (2015). National
journals and centering institutions: A historiography of an English language
teaching journal in Taiwan. English for
Specific
Purposes, 381, 70–84.
(2017). English
Medium “National” Journals Beyond the Anglophone Center: A Qualitative Study
of Multilingual Scholars and their Publishing Decisions in
Taiwan [Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest.
(2022). Editorial
Peer Review at Basic and Applied Science Journals in the Semiperiphery
Context of
Taiwan. In M. Z. C. Hanganu-Bresch, G. Cutrufello, & S. Maci (Eds.), Routledge
Handbook of Scientific
Communication (pp. 90–101). Routledge.
(2025). Languages
of publication among multilingual researchers: Locality to mobility in the
Taiwan context. Journal of English for
Academic
Purposes, 751, 101501.
Spooner, M. (2022). The
shape of editorial
work. In G. Giberson, M. Schoen, & C. Weisser (Eds.), Behind
the curtain of scholarly publishing: Editors in writing
studies (pp. vii–xiii). Utah State University Press.
Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Journal
Editors: Gatekeepers or
custodians. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice
Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, mentors,
gatekeepers (pp. 253–270). Palgrave Macmillan.
Tardy, C. M. (2019). We
are all reviewer #2: A window into the secret world of peer
review. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice
Writers and Scholarly Publication: Authors, mentors,
gatemkeepers (pp. 271–289). Palgrave Macmillan.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2011). Scholarly
Communication in Education Journals
[Article]. Social Science
History, 35(1), 109–130.
Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics
and geoculture: Essays on the changing
world-system. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, F.-N. (2006). Measures
to shorten publication lags for journals in
China. Journal of Scholarly
Publishing, 38(1), 41–46. [URL].
(2008). Problems
and solutions for social science journals at Chinese
universities. Journal of Scholarly
Publishing, 39(4), 410–416. [URL]
