Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 6:1 (2025) ► pp.66–92

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Authorial presence in academic writing

A diachronic study of self-reference in Science abstracts and full texts

ORCiD logo with link | Nanjing University
 | Nanjing University
ORCiD logo with link | Nanjing University
Published online: 4 December 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.24011.wei
Abstract
Self-reference plays an important role in academic writing since it reflects the identity of the authors and may also serve as an indicator of authorial presence. This study investigates the diachronic change in self-reference by conducting a quantitative analysis of 23 self-reference markers in a 10-million-word corpus comprising research articles published in Science from 1997 to 2021. The analysis also compares the diachronic change of self-reference in both abstracts and full texts. Our diachronic analysis reveals three salient trends: (1) divergent patterns between abstracts and full texts, with abstracts demonstrating higher authorial presence overtime; (2) a significant increase in first-person plural pronouns and determiners (we/our/us/ours), particularly prominent in abstracts; (3) a significant rise of third-person noun phrases (i.e., the author) and inanimate noun phrases (i.e., this study), particularly in full texts; does not read well. Such shifts in authorial presence may have evolved as a promotional discourse strategy. Finally, the findings of this study yield both empirical and pedagogical implications.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research background
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Diachronic trends of overall self-reference
    • 4.2Diachronic trends of first-person pronouns/determiners (singular plural)
    • 4.3Diachronic trends of third person pronouns
    • 4.4Diachronic trends of non-personal self-reference
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (52)
References
Batres-Prieto, V., & Abbas, A. (2025). Self-mentions in design area disciplines: A corpus analysis. Heliyon, 11(1), e41200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2020). #LancsBox (Version 5.x) [Computer software]. Lancaster University. [URL]
Can, T., & Cangır, H. (2019). A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 421, 100796.
Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 201, 192–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, X., Lei, L., & Wen, J. (2020). Promoting science with linguistic devices: A large-scale study of positive and negative words in academic writing. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 82–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2020). Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 451, 100856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, L., Cheng, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). Promotional strategies in English and Chinese research article introduction and discussion/conclusion sections: A cross-cultural study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 681, 101344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, J., Du, K., & Buckingham, L. (2024). Author self-reference: A cross-linguistic/cultural and cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 681, 101352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 641, 101272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 11–33). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gao, X. (2018). A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of first person pronouns in academic English writing. Text & Talk, 38(1), 93–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harwood, N. (2005a). “We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap”: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). “Nowhere has anyone attempted…In this article I aim to do just that”: A corpus-based study on self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1207–1231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). (In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a proposed heuristic for future research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first-year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 331, 53–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002a). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 56(4), 351–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 251–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 451, 40–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers’ discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 491, 26–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Y. (2007). The construction of identity with “I”: Writer identity in EFL writing through the first person pronoun. English Teaching, 62(4), 373–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Z. (2021). Authorial presence in research article abstracts: A diachronic investigation of the use of first person pronouns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 511, 100977. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2006). “I will argue that”: First person pronouns as metadiscoursal devices in research article abstracts in English and Spanish. ESP Across Cultures, 31, 23–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The construction of the author’s voice in academic writing: The interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors. Text & Talk, 31(2), 173–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín, P., & Pérez, I. K. L. (2014). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 341, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Learning, 14(3), 174–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of…”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 139–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 86–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2007). “I/we focus on…”: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61, 143–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rongen Breivega, K., Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2002). Traces of self and others in research articles: A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 218–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salas, M. D. (2015). Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines (Linguistics, Economics and Medicine). Journal of Pragmatics, 771, 20–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starfield, S., & Ravelli, L. J. (2006). “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(3), 222–243.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Suppl.), S23–S39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Zeng, L. (2021). Disciplinary recognized self-presence: Self-mention used with hedges and boosters in PhD students’ research writing. Sage Open, 11(2). 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, J. U., & Lei, L. (2022). Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years. Applied Linguistics, 43(2), 340–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. A., Vylomova, E., McGrath, M. J., & Haslam, N. (2021). More confident, less formal: Stylistic changes in academic psychology writing from 1970 to 2016. Scientometrics, 1261, 9603–9612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xia, G. (2017). A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of first-person pronouns in academic English writing. Text & Talk, 38(1), 93–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yakhontova, T. (2006). Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 153–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, Z. M., & Yao, M. (2022). Is academic writing becoming more positive? A large-scale diachronic case study of Science research articles across 25 years. Scientometrics, 127(11), 6191–6207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yao, M., Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Promoting research by reducing uncertainty in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic case study on hedging in Science research articles across 25 years. Scientometrics, 128(8), 4541–4558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue