Article published In: Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 2:1 (2021) ► pp.62–80
Perspectives
Nature of disciplinarity
What do discipline-specific studies of research articles need to consider?
Published online: 2 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.20023.kwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.20023.kwa
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Disciplines and disciplinarity
- 2.1Attempts at defining a discipline
- 2.2Dynamism and heterogeneity
- 2.3Disciplinarity of young and emerging domains
- 3.Knowledge to gain about the disciplines
- 3.1Status and genealogy
- 3.2Epistemic heterogeneity and dynamism
- 3.3Attributes of the epistemic repertoire(s)
- 3.4Types of RAs and journals
- 4.Accessing specialist knowledge
- 4.1Specialist informants
- 4.2Specialist literature
- 4.3Collaboration with specialists
- 5.Introducing the disciplines and incorporating specialist knowledge in writing
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (56)
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Society for Research into Higher Education Research and Open Press University.
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.
(2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowan & Littlefield.
Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.
(1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure of output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213.
Bolton, K., & Lam, A. S. L. (2006). Applied linguistics in China. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 350–356). Elsevier.
(2019). Examining the “applied aspirations” in the ESP genre analysis of published journal articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 381, 36–47.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 461, 90–106.
de Bot, K. (2006). Applied in Europe. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 356–362). Elsevier.
Dogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1990). Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 24(2), 56–73.
Getz, D. (2002). Event studies and event management: On becoming an academic discipline. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 91, 12–23.
Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lü, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 1–4.
Goes, P. B. (2014). Editor’s comments: Design science research in top information systems journals. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), iii–viii.
Grabe, W. (2010). Applied linguistics: A twenty-first-century discipline. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 34–44). Oxford University Press.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (2006). Applied linguistics in North America. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 363–369). Elsevier.
Graves, H., Moghaddasi, S., & Hashim, A. (2014). “Let G ¼ (V, E) be a graph”: Turning the abstract into the tangible in introductions in mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 361, 1–11.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 371, 337–355.
Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C. H., & Walker, et al. (2006). Supply management: Is it a discipline? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 261, 730–753.
Hatherell, W., & Bartlett, J. (2005). Positioning public relations as an academic discipline in Australia. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(2), 1–13.
Higgins, S. (2001). Digital curation: The emergence of a new discipline. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 78–88.
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2015). Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 391, 12–25.
(2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 211, 385–395.
Junghans, A., & Olsson, N. O. E. (2014). Discussion of facilities management as an academic discipline. Facilities, 321, 67–79.
King, J. L., & Lyytinen, K. (Eds.). (2006). Information systems: The state of the field. John Wiley & Sons.
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. NCRM Working Paper Series 03/09. University of Southampton.
Kuteeva, M., & Negretti, R. (2016). Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 411, 36–49.
Kuteeva, M., & McGrath, L. (2015). The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics. Applied Linguistics, 361, 215–235.
Kwan, B. S. C. (2017). A cross-paradigm macro-structural analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, 451, 14–30.
Kwan, B. S. C., & Chan, H. (2014). An investigation of source use in the Results and the closing sections of empirical articles in Information Systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 141, 29–47.
Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C. K. C. (2012). Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 311, 188–201.
Lewis, J., & Bartlett, N. (2013). Inscribing a discipline: Tensions in the field of bioinformatics. New Genetics and Society, 321, 243–263.
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 941, 589–593.
Louçã, F. (2007). The years of high econometrics: A short history of the generation that reinvented economics. Routledge.
Lowenstein, A. (2004). Gerontology coming of age: The transformation of social gerontology into a distinct academic discipline. Educational Gerontology, 301, 129–141.
Matusall, S., Kaufmann, I. M., & Christen, M. (2015). The emergence of social neuroscience. In J. Decety & J. T. Caciopo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp.9–27). Oxford University Press.
Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of ”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 139–151.
Moghadassi, S., & Graves, H. A. B. (2017). “Since Hadwiger’s conjection…is still open”: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 451, 69–85.
Moghaddasi, S., Graves, H. A. B., Graves, R., & Gutierrez, X. (2019). “See Figure 1”: Visual moves in discrete mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 561, 50–67.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research Areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 541, 1237–1249.
Österle, H., Becker, U., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., & Sinz, E. J. (2011). Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 201, 7–10.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of Computer Science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 181, 139–160.
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 571, 1380–1400.
Stichweh, R. (1992). The sociology of scientific disciplines: On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Science in Context, 5(1), 3–15.
(2001). History of scientific disciplines. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 201 (pp. 13727–13731). Elsevier.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Trowler, P. R. (2012). Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: Conceptual groundwork. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st century (pp. 5–29). Routledge.
(2014). Depicting and researching disciplines: Strong and moderate essentialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 391, 1720–1731.
