Article published In: Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 5:1/2 (2024) ► pp.60–82
The evolution of sub-disciplinary linguistic trends
A diachronic study of biomedical research article titles
Published online: 17 January 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00027.mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00027.mar
Abstract
This study examines, from a diachronic stand, the linguistic features of research article titles in a particular
journal in the specific field of experimental medical biology, and how the titling trends of this sub-disciplinary community have
evolved over time. Following a corpus-based textual approach, we have compiled a corpus of 360 titles published in the
Journal of Experimental Medicine over the period 1940–2023. We have mainly focused on the analysis of the
length of titles, their prevalent syntactic structures, the types of information elements that they contain, the use of
promotional lexical items, and their frequency of occurrence. The findings revealed an increasing trend to write longer titles
with more complex syntactic structures and more persuasive information elements. The nominal types that were prevalent in the
first decades, indicating the research topic and describing the methods, have been replaced in more recent decades by verbal
constructions which also report on the most salient results and/or conclusions, whose relevance is emphasised by the use of
persuasive lexical items (boosters and hyperbolic language). These findings point to a major shift over the last few decades
towards an increasing promotional slant of academic titling practices in the sub-discipline of experimental medical biology.
Resumen
Este estudio examina, desde una perspectiva diacrónica, las características lingüísticas de los títulos de artículos de investigación publicados en una revista concreta en el campo específico de la biología médica experimental, y cómo las prácticas retóricas de esta comunidad subdisciplinaria han evolucionado a través del tiempo. Para ello, hemos recopilado un corpus de 360 títulos publicados en Journal of Experimental Medicine durante el período 1940–2023. Nos hemos centrado principalmente en el análisis de la longitud de los títulos, sus estructuras sintácticas predominantes, los tipos de elementos de información que contienen, el uso de elementos léxicos promocionales y su frecuencia de uso. Los resultados revelaron una tendencia creciente a escribir títulos más largos con estructuras sintácticas más complejas y elementos de información más persuasivos. Las construcciones nominales que prevalecían en las primeras décadas, indicando el tema de investigación y describiendo los métodos, han sido reemplazadas en décadas más recientes por construcciones verbales que también informan sobre los resultados y/o conclusiones más destacados, cuya relevancia se enfatiza con el uso de elementos léxicos persuasivos. Estos hallazgos apuntan a un cambio significativo en las últimas décadas hacia una creciente tendencia a redactar los títulos de una forma cada vez más promocional en la subdisciplina de la biología médica experimental.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review on relevant studies
- 3.Materials and methods
- 4.Results
- 4.1Title length and number of authors
- 4.2Types of syntactic structures
- 4.3Types of information elements
- 4.4The use of promotional language
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Note
References
References (45)
Anthony, L. (2001). Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3), 187–194.
Ball, R. (2009). Scholarly communication in transition: The use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005. Scientometrics, 79(3), 667–679.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1998). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Busch-Lauer, I. (2000). Titles in English and German research papers in medicine and linguistics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 77–97). John Benjamins.
Buter, R. K., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics, 51, 608–617.
Cheng, S. W., Kuo, C. W., & Kuo, C. H. (2012). Research article titles in applied linguistics. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(1), A1–A14.
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaborations, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 71, 861–873.
Flowerdew, J. (2022). Models of English for research publication purposes. World Englishes, 411, 571–583.
Fraser, V. J., & Martin, J. G. (2009). Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? Respiratory Research, 101, 351.
Gnewuch, M., & Wohlrabe, K. (2017). Title characteristics and citations in economics. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1573–1578.
Goodman, R. A., Thacker, S. B., & Siegel, P. Z. (2001). What’s in a title? A descriptive study of article titles in peer-reviewed medical journals. Science Editor, 24(3), 75–78.
Hartley, J. (2005). To attract or to inform: What are titles for? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35(2), 203–213.
(2007). Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic articles. Library and Information Science Research, 29(4), 553–568.
Hudson, J. (2016). An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: Authors, disciplines, and stylistic details. Scientometrics, 1091, 871–889.
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 221, 113–135.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021). ‘Our striking results demonstrate…’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype. Journal of Pragmatics, 1821, 189–202.
Hyland, K., & Zou, H. (2022). Titles in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 561, 101094.
Jacques, T. S., & Sebire, N. J. (2010). The impact of article titles on citation hits: An analysis of general and specialist medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports, 1(1), 1–5.
Jaime-Sisó, M. (2009). Titles or headlines? Anticipating conclusions in biomedical research article titles as a persuasive journalistic strategy to attract busy readers. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 391, 29–54.
Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 881, 653–661.
Kerans, M. E., Marshall, J., Murray, A., & Sabatè, S. (2020). Research article title content and form in high-ranked international clinical medicine journals. English for Specific Purposes, 601, 127–139.
Lewison, G., & Hartley, J. (2005). What’s in a title? Number of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63(2), 341–356.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Martín, P., & León-Pérez, I. K. (2014). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 341, 1–13.
(2017). Disseminating research internationally: Intra-subdisciplinary rhetorical structure variation in Immunity and Allergy research articles. In M. Cargill & S. Burgess (Eds.), Publishing research in English as an Additional Language: Practices, pathways and potentials (pp. 151–168). University of Adelaide Press.
(2024). The rise of promotional communicative functions in medical research article abstracts: A diachronic (1940–2022) perspective. Higher Education, 881, 209–223.
Méndez, D. I., Alcaraz, M. Á., & Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Titles in English-medium astrophysics research articles. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2331–2351.
Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of…”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 139–151.
Milojevic, S. (2017). The length and semantic structure of article titles — evolving disciplinary practices and correlations with impact. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analysis, 21, 2.
Nagano, R. L. (2015). Research article titles and disciplinary conventions: A corpus study of eight disciplines. Journal of Academic Writing, 5(1), 133–144.
Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2016). What makes a good title and (how) does it matter for citations? A review and general model of article title attributes in management science. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1331–1359.
Paiva, Carlos E., Nogueira Lima, J. P., & Ribeiro Paiva, B. (2012). Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics, 67(5), 509–513.
Pearson, W. (2021). Quoted speech in linguistics research article titles: Patterns of use and effects of citations. Scientometrics, 1261, 3421–3442.
Salager-Meyer, F., & Alcazar-Ariza, M. A. (2013). Titles are ‘‘serious stuff’’: A historical study of academic titles. JAHR, 4(7), 257–271.
Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 90–102.
(2011). Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific articles written in English and Spanish. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 124–137.
Strauss, P., & Manalo, E. (2023). “Most good papers are published in English”: Japanese academics’ perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks of writing and publishing in English. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 4(1), 5–28.
Subotic, S., & Mukherjee, B. (2014). Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles. Journal of Information Science, 401, 115–124.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Vinkers, C. H., Tijdink, J. K., & Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: Retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal, 3511, h6467.
Wang, Y., & Bai, Y. (2007). A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System, 35(3), 388–399.
