Article published In: Journal of English-Medium Instruction
Vol. 4:2 (2025) ► pp.212–237
Assessment in EMI in the higher education context of Taiwan
Practices, challenges, and needs
Published online: 30 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.24019.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.24019.li
Abstract
English as a medium of instruction (EMI) has been adopted as an official education policy in Taiwan, leading to a
significant expansion of EMI programs across universities in recent years. Substantial resources have been allocated to enhance
teachers’ professional development in EMI. The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it uses a questionnaire to examine EMI
teachers’ self-reported assessment practices in their classrooms and their perceived levels of skillfulness in assessment
techniques. Second, it explores the challenges and assessment training needs of EMI teachers through interviews. The findings
indicate a growing awareness among EMI teachers of the effect of instructional medium on learning, leading them to employ
supportive strategies in assessment. However, additional guidance on assessment is needed to reduce excessive reliance on personal
experiences. The results of this study underscore the need for institute-level guidelines, institutional support, and targeted
professional development in assessment to ensure effective practices that align with the goals of EMI. These findings have
significant implications for improving EMI teacher assessment literacy and advancing EMI professional development courses within
an EFL context.
摘要
近年來,臺灣將英語為授課語言(EMI)納入官方教育政策,此舉促使各大學積極發展並擴展EMI課程。為強化教師在EMI教學中的專業發展,政府也投入了大量資源。本研究主要有兩個目的。首先,我們透過問卷調查,請EMI教師自我報告其在課堂中的評量實踐方式,並評估其對自身評量技術熟練程度的認知。其次,我們透過訪談深入探討EMI教師在評量方面面臨的挑戰與專業發展需求。研究結果顯示,EMI教師日益意識到授課語言對學習成效的影響,這促使他們在評量中採用支持性策略。然而,為減少教師過度依賴個人經驗進行評量,仍需提供更多針對EMI評量的具體指導。本研究的發現凸顯了制定校內指導方針、提供制度性支持,以及規劃EMI評量相關專業發展課程的重要性,以確保EMI教學目標得以實現。這些發現有助提升EMI教師的評量素養,並優化英語為外語(EFL)環境中的EMI
專業發展課程。
Article outline
- Introduction
- The EMI policy in Taiwan and EMI professional development resources
- Challenges in EMI assessment
- Assessment literacy in EMI
- Assessment practices of EMI teachers in the higher education context in Taiwan
- Method
- The questionnaire study
- Participants
- EMI classroom assessment practices: The revised ECAP questionnaire
- The interview study
- Participants
- Semi-structured interviews
- The questionnaire study
- Results
- Questionnaire results
- The scale of frequency
- The skillfulness scale
- Roles of languages in the EMI classroom
- Interviews with the EMI teachers
- Assessment practices in the EMI classroom
- Language policies in the EMI classroom
- The challenges of conducting EMI assessment
- Professional development and training needs
- Questionnaire results
- Discussion
- Conclusion and implications
References
References (29)
Airey, J. (2012). “I
don’t teach language”: The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA
Review, 251, 64–79.
American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education,
& National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher
competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and
Practice, 9(4), 30–32.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment
and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and
Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Carless, D. (2015). Exploring
learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher
Education, 691, 963–976.
Chin, J. S., & Li, N. (2021). Exploring
the language and pedagogical models suitable for EMI in Chinese-speaking higher education
contexts. In L. I-W. Su, H. Cheung & J. R. W. Wu (Eds.), Rethinking
EMI: Multidisciplinary perspectives from Chinese-speaking
regions (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing
and conducting mixed methods research (3rd
ed.). SAGE.
Executive Yuan, Taiwan. (2002). The
challenge 2008: National development plan. [URL]
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions
under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher
Education, 11, 3–31. [URL]
Hu, G., & Li, X. (2017). Asking
and answering questions in English-medium instruction classrooms: What is the cognitive and syntactic complexity
level? In J. Zhao & L. Q. Dixon (Eds.), English-medium
instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and
evaluation (pp. 184–203). Routledge.
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2022). EMI
programs and formative assessment: Implications for the assessment literacy of content
lecturers. Journal of English-Medium
Instruction, 1(2), 204–231.
Kao, Y-T., & Tsou, W. (2017). EMI
course assessment: A survey study of the issues. In W. Tsou & S-M. Kao (Eds.), English
as a medium of instruction in higher education: Implementations and classroom practices in
Taiwan (pp. 183–205). Springer.
Li, N., & Wu, J. (2018). Exploring
assessment for learning practices in the EMI classroom in the context of Taiwanese higher
education. Language Education &
Assessment, 11, 28–44.
Lo, Y. Y. (2021). Researching
assessment in EMI. In J. K. H. Pun & S. M. Curle (Eds.), Research
methods in English medium
instruction (pp. 61–74). Routledge.
Migiro, S. O., & Magangi, B. A. (2011). Mixed
methods: A review of literature and the future of the new research paradigm. African Journal of
Business
Management, 5(10), 3757–3764.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2021a). The
program on bilingual education for students in college. [URL]
Ministry of Education,
Taiwan. (2021b). (Institution name) The program on bilingual education for
students in college. [URL]
National Development Council,
Taiwan. (2018). Blueprint for developing Taiwan into a bilingual nation by
2030. [URL]
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment
literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into
Practice, 48(1), 4–11.
Reierstam, H. (2024). Assessment
of content and language: The case of CLIL, EMI, and multilingual
contexts. In M. D. Ramírez-Verdugo (Ed.), Transnational
approaches to bilingual and second language teacher
education (pp. 197–218). Routledge.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE
handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd
ed.). SAGE.
Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented
assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
assessment (pp. 255–274). De Gruyter Mouton.
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking
internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leisure
Sciences, 39(2), 163–173.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hsu, Hsiao-Wen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
