Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of English-Medium Instruction
Vol. 4:2 (2025) ► pp.166–188

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Importance marking in EMI and L1 lectures

A case of similarities and idiolect

ORCiD logo with link | University of Luxembourg
ORCiD logo with link | University of Bologna
Published online: 8 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.24018.der
Abstract
This study compares how lecturers signal important points with metadiscursive importance markers (e.g., the point is; remember) when they lecture in English as their first language (L1) as opposed to English as an additional language (English-medium instruction, EMI). Importance marking is a feature of discourse structuring, which is widely advocated for inclusion in listening and lecturing training. We analysed a corpus of 46 engineering lectures from Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand and the UK. Comparing the EMI with the L1 corpus revealed that importance marking happened to the same extent. However, this belies substantial frequency differences between the two components that make up each of these corpora. We further found that both L1 and EMI lecturers used a large variety of markers and lexis. Overwhelmingly, differences could not be attributed to the different lecture contexts. Instead, they were typically due to idiolect. This suggests the specificity of language use in lectures and the dangers in lumping together varieties as representing EMI or L1 lecture discourse. We conclude with pedagogical implications for lecturer training.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methodology
  • Results and discussion
    • Verb markers
    • Noun markers
    • Adjective markers
    • Adverb markers
    • Assessment references and idioms
  • Conclusion and pedagogical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (70)
References
Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Metadiscourse use when shifting from L1 to EMI lecturing: implications for teacher training. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(4–5), 297–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden. European Journal of Physics, 271, 553–560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akincioğlu, M. (2023). Rethinking of EMI in higher education: A critical view on its scope, definition and quality. Language Culture and Curriculum, 37(2), 139–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allison, D., & Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse organisation on lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 14(2), 157–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernad-Mechó, E. (2024). Building successful communication in EMI contexts: A multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47(2), 259–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernad-Mechó, E., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2019). Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: Metadiscourse beyond language. In I. C. Sancho-Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in professional genres: Deference and disclosure (pp. 321–340). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Björkman, B. (2010). So you think you can ELF: English as a lingua franca as the medium of instruction. Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 451, 77–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broggini, S., & Murphy, A. C. (2017). Metadiscourse in EMI lectures: Reflections on a small corpus of spoken academic discourse. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria XXV, 325–340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, S. W. (2012). “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clerehan, R. (1995). Taking it down: Notetaking practices of L1 and L2 students. English for Specific Purposes, 14(2), 137–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, F., & Mariotti, C. (2017). Differences in content presentation and learning outcomes in English-medium instruction (EMI) vs. Italian-medium instruction (IMI) contexts. In R. Wilkinson & M. L. Walsh (Eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: From theory to practice: Selected papers from the 2013 ICLHE conference (pp. 187–204). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Input in English-medium instruction. Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2004). Audience-oriented relevance markers in business studies lectures. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation (pp. 81–97). Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dafouz Milne, E., & Núñez Perucha, B. (2010). Metadiscursive devices in university lectures: A contrastive analysis of L1 and L2 teacher performance. In T. N. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Ed.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 213–232). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, L., & Wannaruk, A. (2021). A contrastive study of rhetorical move structure of English medium instruction lectures given by native English and Chinese lecturers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 451–477.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deroey, K. L. B. (2014a, 19–21 June). Importance marking in lectures by native and non-native speakers [Conference presentation]. IVACS International Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
(2014b). “Anyway, the point I’m making is”: Lexicogrammatical relevance marking in lectures. In L. Vandelanotte, D. Kristin, G. Caroline & K. Ditte (Eds.), Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora (pp. 265–291). Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Marking importance in lectures: Interactive and textual orientation. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The representativeness of lecture listening coursebooks: Language, lectures, research-informedness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 341, 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). English medium instruction lecturer training programmes: Content, delivery, ways forward. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 621, Article 101223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deroey, K. L. B., & Taverniers, M. (2012a). “Ignore that ‘cause it’s totally irrelevant”: Marking lesser relevance in lectures. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2085–2099. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Just remember this: Lexicogrammatical relevance markers in lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 221–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002). Successful lecturing: Presenting information in ways that engage effective processing. New directions for teaching and learning, 891, 19–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System, 1051, Article 102730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duszak, A. (1997). Culture and styles of academic discourse. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Polo, F. J. (2024). If you look at the table...: Directives in conference presentations and university lectures. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 501–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, J. (2012). The cognitive validity of the lecture-based question in the IELTS listening paper. IELTS collected papers, 21, 391–453.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1996). Lecturer perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, 27(1), 23–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of “we” in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), 45–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2013). Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 109–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hultgren, A. K., Owen, N., Shrestha, P., Kuteeva, M., & Mežek, Š. (2022). Assessment and English as a medium of instruction: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), 105–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibrahim, N. M., & Ahmad, U. K. (2014). “… so it is very important...”: Evaluative adjectives in engineering lectures. Kajian Malaysia, 321(Supp. 1), 111–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H. (2024). “This is for sure a question at your exams”: Assessment references in EMI and L1 engineering lectures. ESP Today, 12(1), 155–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H., & Picciuolo, M. (2022). The EMIBO corpus: A resource for investigating lecture discourse across disciplines and lecture modes in an EMI context. Lingue e Linguaggi, 531, 253–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, E. H. S. (2003). The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 562–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P., Tugwell, D. (2004). The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress. pp. 105–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 42–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, C. Y. (2012). Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A matter of academic cultures or lecturing styles? English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 117–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, C. -Y., & Chen, H. -J. H. (2022). A phraseological exploration of university lectures through phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 581, Article 101135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (1994). Training lecturers for international audiences. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 269–289). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2023). Reflexively speaking: Metadiscourse in English as a Lingua Franca. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molino, A. (2018). “What I’m speaking is almost English. . . “: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English-medium lectures at an Italian university. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 181, 935–956. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Lexical bundles in EMI lectures: An exploratory study. Textus, 32(1), 119–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morell, T. (2000). EFL content lectures: A discourse analysis of an interactive and a non-interactive style. Working papers 71. Alicante, Spain: Departamento de Filologi’a Inglesa, Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulligan, D., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000). How much do they understand? Lectures, students and comprehension. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 311–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, H. (2001). A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines. In J. Cotterill & A. Ife (Eds.), Language across boundaries: BAAL 161. (pp. 201–218). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olsen, L. A., & Huckin, T. H. (1990). Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 9(1), 33–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 19–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-García, D. (2019). “I can’t find the words now...”: Teacher Discourse Strategies and their Communicative Potential in Spanish-and English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education. CLIL: Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(2), 0043–0055. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleef, E. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1104–1124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Accommodation and the idiom principle in English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(2), 195–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (2020). Comprehension in English medium instruction (EMI) lectures: On the impact of lecturer L2 English use. Language Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 73–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Factors affecting notetaking performance. International Journal of Listening, 38(2), 118–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. H. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SketchEngine: [URL]
Tao, H. (2001). Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America (pp. 116–144). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 447–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titsworth, B. S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 641, 385–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2018). Formulaic sequences signalling discourse organisation in ELF academic lectures: A disciplinary perspective. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(2), 355–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wardaugh, R. & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegener, R., Schüller, B., & Cassens, J. (2017). Needing and wanting in academic lectures: Profiling the academic lecture across contexts. In P. Chappell & J. S. Knox (Eds.), Transforming contexts: Papers from the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress (pp. 821). Organising Committee of the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress.
Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeager, R., Park, G., & Liao, R. J. (2024). Notetaking as validity evidence: A mixed-methods investigation of question preview in EAP listening assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 681, Article 101346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeo, J. -Y., & Ting, S. -H. (2014). Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 341, 26–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, L. (1994). University lectures: Macro-structure and micro-features. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 159–176). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, L., & Lo, Y. Y. (2021). EMI teachers’ use of interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation and knowledge construction. In D. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice (pp. 56–79). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue