Article published In: Journal of English-Medium Instruction: Online-First Articles
Reframing EMI
From policy gaps to professionalisation and institutional transformation
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Oxford.
Published online: 23 March 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.00012.aki
https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.00012.aki
Abstract
[This keynote paper was presented at the International Multidisciplinary Conference on English as a Catalyst for Knowledge Transfer and Collaboration in European University Alliances, organised by AGH University of Kraków on 11–12 September 2025.]
This paper should be seen as a response to persistent fragmentation in English-medium instruction (EMI) policy, pedagogy, and scholarship. Rather than adding to the field’s growing “research noise”, it advances a solution oriented paradigm (SoP) grounded in a political — normative argument: EMI must be theorised and professionalised as an institutional practice rather than reduced to a linguistic or methodological problem. Anchored in critical social theory and sociocultural theory, and coordinated through an integrative program of epistemic coordination, the paper reframes EMI as a political choice, a culturally embedded practice, and an accountable professional domain. I argue that EMI quality can only be understood as alignment between policy, pedagogy, and student learning outcomes, and illustrate how this alignment can be operationalised through the EMI professionalisation framework (EMI ProF). Written in a keynote register adapted to journal convention, this paper aims to speak with, not just to, international EMI stakeholders, calling for collaboration, innovation, and transformation as necessary conditions for sustainable, equitable, and learning centred EMI futures.
Article outline
- Introduction: Reframing the EMI university
- From policy to practice: The gap and the paradigm
- EMI as a political-theoretical project
- Definitions and the scope of EMI
- From orthodoxy to noise: Why EMI needs a paradigm shift
- From cosmetic policies to accountable quality
- Collaboration that counts: Beyond quick fixes
- EMI professionalisation: A paradigm shift
- The EMI ProF: A framework for professionalisation
- The future of EMI: From fragmentation to professionalisation
- Notes
References
References (38)
Akıncıoğlu, M. (in press). Guiding faculty professionalisation in EMI universities: The EMI ProF as an institutional model for sustainable development. In M. Doran & J. Rieker (Eds.), Innovations in EMI faculty professional development. Springer
(2025). Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation. International Journal of Educational Development, 1151, Article 03276.
(2024a). A framework for language specialist and content teacher collaboration in Turkish EMI university settings: The collaborative planning tool. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 3(2), 141–163.
(2024b). Rethinking of EMI: A critical view on its scope, definition and quality. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(2), 139–154. .
Block, D. (2022). The dark side of EMI?: A telling case for questioning assumptions about EMI in HE. Educational Linguistics, 1(1), 82–107.
Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Lin, B. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge handbook of English-medium instruction in higher education. Routledge.
Buckner, E. (2019). The internationalization of higher education: National interpretations of a global model. Comparative Education Review, 63(3), 315–336.
Canagarajah, S. (2014), In search of a new paradigm for teaching English as an international language. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 767–785.
Chankseliani, M., & McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education, 811, 1–8.
Cierpich-Kozieł, A., & Mańczak-Wohlfeld, E. (2021). The Englishization of Polish higher education. In R. Wilkinson & R. Gabriëls (Eds.), The Englishization of higher education in Europe (pp. 259–280. Amsterdam University Press.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). Road-mapping English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council.
Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455–486.
Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30. Routledge.
Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R., (2020). The provision of student support on English medium instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English Academic Purposes, 451, Article 100846. .
Hampson, T., & McKinley, J. (2024). Systematic review, systematic bias? An example from EMI research. Language Teaching. Advance online publication.
Han, J. (2023). English medium instruction as a local practice: Language, culture and pedagogy. Springer.
Knight, J. (2003). Updated definition of internationalization. International Higher Education. (331).
Kortmann, B. (2019). Language policies at the LERU member institutions (Briefing Paper No 4). League of European Research Universities.
Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Socio-cultural theory: A unified approach to L2 learning and teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of language teaching: Part 1 (pp. 693–701. Springer.
Lasagabaster, D. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Macaro, E., Akıncıoğlu, M., & Dearden, J. (2016). English medium instruction in universities: A collaborative experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51–76.
Macaro, E., & Akıncıoğlu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256–270.
Macaro, E., Akıncıoğlu, M., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in higher education: Teacher perspectives on professional development and certification. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 144–157.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76.
Ostrowicka, H. (2022). Economization of discourse on education and pedagogization of economic problems: Media debate on higher education reform in Poland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(1), 86–100.
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515.
Pun, J. K. H., & Curle, S. M. (Eds.). (2021). Research methods in English medium instruction. Routledge.
Requena-Ramos, C. (2025). Towards consensus building in second language acquisition: A sociophilosophical perspective. Applied Linguistics Press.
Solbrekke, T. D., & Englund, T. (2011). Bringing professional responsibility back in. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 847–861.