Article published In: Restructuring Chinese Speech Communities: Urbanization, language contact and identity formation
Edited by Marinus van den Berg
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 26:1] 2016
► pp. 32–55
Attitude, maintenance, and use of Beijing dialect and Putonghua among younger generation Beijing-born residents
Published online: 16 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.26.1.02son
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.26.1.02son
In this study, 269 Beijing born respondents were interviewed and asked questions about their language attitude and language behavior. Research categories, apart from ‘attitude’, were ‘accent maintenance’, ‘accent selection’, and ‘code-switching’, whereas the variables employed were ‘gender’, ‘age group’, ‘origin’ of parents, ‘district’ grown-up, ‘spouse’ background, ‘education’ level, ‘job profile’, and ‘network density’. We found that Beijing dialect in Beijing’s central city districts, coexists with the national language Putonghua, or, Standard Chinese, has high language status among native young people in Beijing and a wide range of uses. The main factors which effect respondents’ language behavior are ‘network density’, ‘place-of-origin’, and ‘occupation’. We also determined a high level of confusion between Beijing dialect accent and Putonghua accent, which we related to the mode of Putonghua teaching and Putonghua promotion. We conclude that Beijing dialect and Putonghua will form two functional varieties, playing different roles in different language environments.
References (5)
Gui Mingchao. (2011). 普通话和北京话之间存在的根本区别 (Essential differences between Beijing dialect and Putonghua). Kunming: Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching and Research on Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition), 111.
Hou Jingyi. (1986). 北京话音档 (The phonetic records of Beijing dialect). Shanghai: Shanghai Education Punblishing.
Hu Mingyang. (1999). Beijinghua Chutan 北京话初探 (A tentative exploration of Beijing dialect). Beijing: Commercial Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
