Article published In: Explored but not Assumed: Revisiting Commonalities in Asian Pacific Communication
Edited by Hui-Ching Chang and Ling Chen
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 25:1] 2015
► pp. 63–77
Dialectics of culture and dynamic balancing between individuality and collectivity
Published online: 15 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.25.1.04lim
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.25.1.04lim
This study offers an Eastern alternative to the Western perspective that is fundamentally disjunctive in its approach to culture and communication. Inspired by Cartesian dualism and Hegelian dialectics, most Western theories subscribe to the concept of cultural divides that separate two different, often opposing, cultural premises, such as individualism-collectivism and high-low context communication. Based upon the holistic worldview and Taoist dualism of the East, this study proposes that intercultural communication scholars should pay more attention to the dynamic processes in which two seemingly opposite forces such as collectivism and individualism interact with each other to maintain homeostasis in society. This study does not intend to mitigate the importance of studying cultural differences or similarities, but aims to steer researchers away from regarding culture as a completely static or dummy variable, claiming that a certain culture is a high-context culture or an individualistic culture.
References (44)
Bertalanffy, L.V. (1969). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.
Brewer, M.B., & Chen, Y. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 1141, 133–151.
Cunha, M.P.E., Cunha, J.V.D., & Dahab, S. (2002). Yin-yang: A dialectical approach to total quality management. Total Quality Management, 131, 843–853.
Earley, P.C., & Gibson, C.B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 241, 265–304.
Fiske, A.P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman, et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 1281, 78–88.
Gelfand, M.J., Triandis, H.C., & Chan, D.K. (1998). Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism? European Journal of Social Psychology, 261, 397–410.
Ghorbani, N., Bing, M.N., Watson, P.J., Davison, H.K., & LeBreton, D.L. (2003). Individualist and collectivist values: Evidence of compatibility in Iran and the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 351, 431–447.
Grabb, E., Baer, D., & Curtis, J. (1999). The origins of American individualism: Reconsidering the historical evidence. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 241, 511–533.
Juckes, T.J., & Barrest, J. (1993). The subjective-objective dimension in the individual-society connection: A duality perspective. Journal for the Theory of social Behavior, 231, 197–216.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J.W. Berry, M.H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology vol. 3: Social behavior and applications (pp. 1–50). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
Kim, J., Lim, T., Dindia, K., & Burrell, N. (2009). Reframing the cultural differences between the East and the West. Paper presented at the annual convention of NCA, Chicago.
Kirkland, R. (n.d.). The I Ching, yin-yang, and the “five forces.” Retrieved from [URL].
Le, T.N., & Stockdale, G.D. (2005). Individualism, collectivism, and delinquency in Asian American adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Adolescent Psychology, 341, 681–691.
Lee, I.H. (2004). Readiness for self-directed learning and the cultural values of individualism/collectivism among American and South Korean college students seeking teacher certification in agriculture. Unpublished master’s thesis, Texas A&M University.
Lim, T., & Kim, J. (2009). Individualism, holism, and cognitive relativity: Overcoming the problem of construct imprecision in intercultural communication research. Paper presented at the annual convention of NCA, Chicago.
Moemeka, A. (1998), Communalism as a fundamental dimension of culture. Journal of Communication, 481, 118–141.
Musschenga, A.W. (2001). Introduction: The many faces of individualism. In A.V. Harskamp & A.W. Musschenga (Eds.), The many faces of individualism (pp. 3–24). Sterling, Virginia: Peeters.
Nisbett, R.E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why? New York: The Free Press.
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 1081, 291–310.
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E.E., Kim, B.J., & Nisbett, R.E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 261, 653–684.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 1281, 3–72.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R.E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 541, 741–754.
Robbins, D. (2003). Vygotsky’s non-classical dialectical metapsychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 331, 303–312.
Sarkar, S. (2009). Individualism–collectivism as predictors of BPO employee attitudes toward union membership in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 261, 93–118.
Schwartz, S.H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 211, 139–157.
. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R.C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 123–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swart, K.W. (1962). “Individualism” in the mid-nineteenth century (1826-1860). Journal of the History of Ideas, 231, 77–90.
Triandis, H. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross Cultural Research, 271, 155–180.
Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M.J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 211, 323–338.
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 741, 118–128.
Tucker, M.E. (2002). Confucian ethics and the ecocrisis. In C.N. Mattews, M.E. Tucker, & P. Hefner (Eds.), When worlds converge (pp. 310–323). Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press (Houghton Mifflin Co.).
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G.E.M., Anscombe, Trans; 2nd ed., 1958). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wong, E.Y. (2001, February). The Chinese at work: Collectivism or individualism? Hong Kong Institute of Business Studies, working paper series 040-001.