Article published In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 34:1 (2024) ► pp.1–22
Local language in the context of political divides
An evaluation of local language use in a voter-information campaign in the Philippines using Facebook split tests
Published online: 25 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00105.men
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00105.men
Abstract
As populist leaders leverage disparities across geographic and language communities, democracies are threatened by
an increasingly divisive political climate that compromises public discussions. This study evaluates how the basic communication
strategy of utilizing local languages in information campaigns can help overcome divides by encouraging engagement and
discussions. We conduct a field experiment to assess whether using the four most prevalent languages in the Philippines
(Cebuano-Bisaya, Ilonggo-Hiligaynon, Ilokano, and Waray-Samarnon) can increase engagement in online materials for targeted
linguistic groups. Through split-testing on Facebook, we find evidence that local language materials are more likely to catch the
attention of the audience and increase engagement. Qualitative validation shows that local language use is an effective tool to
build self-efficacy for linguistic groups to join in on national conversations, and serves as an identity marker to evoke a sense
of pride and community. These findings open opportunities for evidence-guided social media campaign strategies.
Keywords: split test, social media, voter information, language
Article outline
- Introduction
- Populism as a political style
- Methodology
- Quantitative phase results
- Qualitative phase results
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (18)
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). The
study of language and space in media discourse. In P. Auer, J. E. Schmidt, & A. Lameli (Eds.), Language
and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic
Variation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton (pp. 1–70).
Contreras, A. P. (2020). Rodrigo
Duterte as Ideology: Academic vs. Social Media Myths and Representations and their Implications to Political
Order. Philippine Political Science
Journal, 41(1–2), 48–72,
Curato, N. (2016). Flirting
with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal
of Contemporary
Asia, 47(1), 142–153,
Haarman, E., Tjaden, J., & Lopez, G. (2018). Assessing
the effectiveness of online Facebook campaigns targeting potential irregular migrants: A pilot study in three West African
countries. International Organization for Migration. [URL]
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The
Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century (Volume 4) (The Julian J. Rothbaum
Distinguished Lecture Series) (unknown ed.), University of Oklahoma Press.
Jagers, J. & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism
as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties discourse in
Belgium. European Journal of Political
Research, 46(3), 319–345.
Lasco, G. (2015, December 28). ‘Imperial
Manila’ | Inquirer Opinion. INQUIRER.net. [URL]
Levitan, L. & Wronski, J. (2013). Social
Context and Information Seeking: Examining the Effects of Network Attitudinal Composition on Engagement with Political
Information. Political
Behavior, 36(4), 793–816.
Mathiot, M. & Garvin, P. L. (1975). The
Functions of Language: A Sociocultural View. Anthropological
Quarterly, 48(3), 148.
Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological
targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National
Academy of
Sciences, 114(48), 12714–12719.
Ong, J. C., Tapsell, R., & Curato, N. (2019). Tracking
Digital Disinformation in the 2019 Philippine Midterm Election. New Mandela Public
Report, [URL]
Orazi, D. C. & Johnston, A. C. (2020). Running
field experiments using Facebook split test. Journal of Business
Research, 1181, 189–198.
Ricks, J. I. (2020). The
effect of language on voter opinion: Results from a survey experiment in Thailand. Political
Behavior 42, 1(2020):83–104.
Teehankee, J. C. (2016). Duterte’s
Resurgent Nationalism in the Philippines: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis. Journal of
Current Southeast Asian
Affairs, 35(3), 69–89.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
