Article published In: Preparing Teachers for Addressing the Sociocultural Issues with Asian Pacific Immigrants and Refugees
Edited by Yin Lam Lee-Johnson and Hsiao-Chin Kuo
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 31:1] 2021
► pp. 58–78
Deconstructing discourses of diversity
Envisioning possibilities from impossibilities in multicultural education in South Korea
Published online: 8 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00057.son
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00057.son
Abstract
Despite the growing number of cross-cultural adolescents from immigrants and families formed through international/interracial marriages in South Korea, empirical studies investigating newcomer adolescents’ identity positioning in secondary education have been scarce. Drawing upon Ruíz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34. framework for language policy and planning and Cummins’ (Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 18–37. , (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). California Association for Bilingual Education.) empowerment framework for minority education, this article investigates how diversity is conceptualised in South Korea through a case study of multicultural education. Specifically, the article examines how newcomer adolescents’ linguistic and cultural identities are perceived by teachers and peers in two high schools. The findings revealed that diversity is dominantly viewed as an impediment to academic success for newcomer youth and is only appreciated once students are fully assimilated into Korean society. The concept of diversity as a resource and right and the notion of multicultural and multilingual identities in the Korean educational context are absent, or hidden, at best. Although there are examples where newcomer learners see diversity as empowerment and resources for their identity construction and positionality, this orientation has not been acknowledged in educational practices. The study calls for conceptualizing diversity as empowerment and resources as ethical lenses to move away from ethnocentric and deficit orientations.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical framework: Orientations to diversity
- Methods
- Findings
- Case 1. Daham’s multicultural education and discourses of diversity
- Institutional discourse of diversity: Educator’s perceptions toward diversity
- Newcomer youth’s perceptions of diversity, plural linguistic and cultural identities at school
- Case 2. Sindo’s multicultural education and discourse of diversity
- Institutional discourse of diversity: Educator’s perceptions toward diversity
- Newcomer youth’s perceptions of diversity, plural linguistic and cultural identities at school
- Case 1. Daham’s multicultural education and discourses of diversity
- Discussion: discourses of diversity
- Strong tendency of diversity-as-impediment to social integration in educators’ perceptions and educational practices
- Diversity as empowerment for positive identity positioning and academic success through students’ countering of dominant discourses
- Ethical responsibility to increase awareness of diversity as rights and resources
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (23)
Chang, I.-S. (2012). Multicultural education in Korea: Its origin, status, and direction. Multicultural Education Review, 4(2), 60–90.
Cho, D., & Yoon, H. (2010). Korea’s initiatives in multicultural education. Retrieved from [URL]
Cho, H. (2009). Study of teachers’ awareness of children from multicultural families: Focusing on an elementary school in Seoul. The Study of Anthropology of Education, 12(1), 263–295.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 18–37.
(2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). California Association for Bilingual Education.
Cummins, J., & Early, M. (2011). Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Trentham Books.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Jahng, K. E., & Lee, S. J. (2013). A poststructuralist analysis of multicultural education in South Korea. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 10(2), 293–314.
Joo, J.-H. (2007). Limits of the mainstream discourses in world history textbooks: An analysis of representations of Islam. The Korean Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(2), 171–195.
Kang, M. O. (2015). Multicultural education in South Korea: Language, ideology, and culture in Korean language arts education. Routledge.
Kim, J. (2014). The politics of inclusion/exclusion: Critical discourse analysis on multicultural education policy documents in South Korea. Multicultural Education Review, 6(2),1–24.
Kim, J. K., Basile, V., Jaime-Diaz, J., & Black, R. (2018). Internal Orientalism and multicultural acts: the challenges of multicultural education in Korea. Multicultural Education Review, 10(1), 3–17.
Kim, S., & Kim, L. H. R. (2012). The need for multicultural education in South Korea. In D. Urias (Ed.), The Immigration & Education Nexus (pp. 243–251). Sense.
Korean Immigration Service. (2016). Kyulhoniminja mit gwihwaja janyo hyunhwang [Children of marriage migrants and naturalized citizens in Korea]. Gwacheon: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea.
Lee, Y. (2013). Analysis of Korean early childhood multicultural education policies based on critical perspective. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 19(2), 109–127.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education and Human Resources. (2006). Educational support countermeasure for children from multicultural families. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2012). Educational advancement plan for multicultural students. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Hong, Younkyung, Eunhye Cho & Kegan Mixdorf
Song, Heejin
Müller, Christoph, Wolfgang Jung, Charles Ben, Andreas Ohndorf & Dirk Zimper
Holm, Daniel T. & Hope Smith Davis
Kim, Yanghee Anna, Jihye Kim & Yeon-Ju Jo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
