Article published In: Developments in Diglossic Settings in the Asian Pacific Region:
Edited by Marinus van den Berg
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 30:1/2] 2020
► pp. 290–309
Regular articles
Media reporting of cyberbullying
A framing analysis of The Star
Published online: 30 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00053.yan
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00053.yan
Abstract
Cyberbullying refers to aggression that is intentionally and repeatedly carried out in an electronic context
(e.g., e-mail, blogs, social networking sites, instant messages, text messages, etc.) against a person who cannot easily defend
him- or herself. Cyberbullying is an important phenomenon to research for many reasons. First, although varying prevalence rates
have been reported, cyberbullying victimization has been found to occur at frequencies that are cause for concern. Second, many
victims of cyberbullying have been found to experience a range of negative outcomes as a consequence. Third, previous studies
found that increased Internet usage has led to increased involvement as perpetrators, victims or witness in cyberbullying. It is
alarming that a survey conducted by Anis, N., Rahim, A., & Lim, Y. (October 10, 2012). Najib: Cyber bullying a serious threat to kids. The Star Online. Retrieved from [URL] in Malaysia revealed
that 60% of the cases took place in social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace. This study aims to examine the coverage
of cyberbullying by The Star, which is the English-language daily newspaper with the largest circulation in
Malaysia. Framing theory was employed as the theoretical framework, while content analysis was used as the research methods. This
study revealed that coverage on cyberbullying in The Star was dominated by the “prevention and intervention
strategies” frame. The social problem was also presented as an individual-level problem (episodic framing) as well as
societal-level issue (thematic framing). Implications of the findings to the understanding of cyberbullying and framing research
were discussed.
Keywords: cyberbullying, social problem, framing, content analysis
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Theoretical framework
- Method
- Findings
- Prevention and intervention strategies
- Prevalence of cyberbullying
- Harmful impact of cyberbullying
- Risks of the internet
- Regulations, laws or court cases related to cyberbullying
- Discussion
- Conclusion and suggestion for future studies
References
References (67)
Abu Bakar, H. S. (2015). The emergence themes of cyberbullying among adolescences. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(4), 393–406.
Anis, N., Rahim, A., & Lim, Y. (October 10, 2012). Najib: Cyber bullying a serious threat to kids. The Star Online. Retrieved from [URL]
Audit Bureau Circulations Malaysia. 2018. Circulation Figures, Newspapers – West Malaysia Publication. [URL]
Balakrishnan, V. (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: The roles of gender, age and internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior, 461, 149–157.
(2017). Unraveling the underlying factors SCuLPT-ing cyberbullying behaviours among Malaysian young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 751, 194–205.
Ballard, M. E., & Welch, K. M. (2017). Virtual warfare: Cyberbullying and cyber-victimization in MMOG play. Games and culture, 12(5), 466–491.
Barlett, C., Chamberlin, K., & Witkower, Z. (2017). Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model. Aggressive behavior, 43(2), 147–154.
Boero, N. (2013). Obesity in the media: Social science weighs in. Critical Public Health, 23(3), 371–380.
Bosman, J., & d’Haenens, L. (2008). News reporting on Pim Fortuyn: Framing in two Dutch newspapers. Media, Culture & Society, 30(5), 735–748.
Boulton, M., Lloyd, J., Down, J., & Marx, H. (2012). Predicting undergraduates’ self-reported engagement in traditional and cyberbullying from attitudes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(3), 141–147.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environment. Journal of Communicatrion, 57(1), 99–118.
Critcher, C. (2013). Model answers: Moral panics and media history. Moral panics, social fears, and the media: Historical Perspectives, 13–27.
De Vreese, C. H., Banducci, S. A., Semetko, H. A., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2006). The news coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics, 7(4), 477–504.
De Vreese, C., & Semetko, H. A. (2002). Cynical and engaged: Strategic campaign coverage, public opinion and mobilization in a referendum campaign. Communication Research, 29(6), 615–641.
Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & De la Piedad Garcia, X. (2014). Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 361, 13–20.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Farezza, H. R. (2017, May 6). Cyberbullying among top five online threats. New Straits Times. Retrieved from [URL]
Ferrara, P., Ianniello, F., Villani, A., & Corsello, G. (2018). Cyberbullying a modern form of bullying: Let’s talk about this health and social problem. Italian journal of pediatrics, 44(1), 14–16.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2014). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press.
International Telecommunication Union (2018). Percentage of individuals using the Internet. Retrieved from [URL]
Iyengar, S. (1991). Framing responsibility for political issues. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 59–70.
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of violence, 3(1), 53.
Kim, S. H. (2015). Who is responsible for a social problem? News framing and attribution of responsibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 554–558.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1089.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), 13–20.
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., Limber, S., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, L. T. (2017, April 11). On the alert for cyberbullying. The Star Online. Retrieved from [URL]
Lent, J. A. (1990). The development of multicultural stability in ASEAN: The role of mass media. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 4(1), 45–58.
Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy and American foreign policy: The evolution of influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mondragon, N. I., de Montes, L. G., & Valencia, J. (2018). Understanding the emergence of infectious diseases: Social representations and mass media. Comunicación y Sociedad, 31(3), 319–330.
Mustafa, K. Anuar. (2010). Epilogue. In E. G. Loo & Mustafa K. Anuar (eds.), Journalism in good faith: Issues and practices in religion reporting (pp. 196–201). Shah Alam: Marshall Cavendish (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.
Ng, C. G., Kanagasundram, S., Yee, H. A., Tan, L. H., & Teoh, K. M. (2016). Cyber bullying – A new social menace. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, 17(1), 104–115.
Notar, C. E., Padgett, S., & Roden, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1–9.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of school health, 80(12), 614–621.
(2015). Measuring cyberbullying: Implications for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 231, 69–74.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 26–32.
Syed Arabi Idid. (1989). Malaysia. In A. Mehra (Ed.). Press systems in ASEAN States. (pp. 41–56). Singapore: AMIC.
Tankard, J. W. (2008). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy & A. E. Grant (eds.), Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. (pp. 95–105). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2016, May 26). Parents and teachers come out in support of updated regulations to tackle bullying.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287.
Van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 435–442.
Wachs, S., Jiskrova, G. K., Vazsonyi, A. T., Wolf, K. D., & Junger, M. (2016). A cross-national study of direct and indirect effects of cyberbullying on cybergrooming victimization via self-esteem. Psicologia educativa, 22(1), 61–70.
Wong, K. K. (2004). Asian-based development journalism and political elections press coverage of the 1999 General Elections in Malaysia. Gazette, 66(1), 25–40.
You, S., & Lim, S. A. (2016). Longitudinal predictors of cyberbullying perpetration: Evidence from Korean middle school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 891, 172–176.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Alawneh, Hatem
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
