Article published In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 29:2 (2019) ► pp.188–210
Media credibility
The impact of privately-owned websites on state-owned televisions in the context of China
Published online: 6 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00030.zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00030.zha
Abstract
Media credibility, as a construct that has been mainly developed in the western context, hasn’t been examined
thoroughly and tested in Asia cultural and social context. This research discusses and verifies media credibility as a
multi-dimensional construct, with the support of empirical data. It discusses the impact of privately-owned news websites, e.g.
Sina, on state-owned television stations, e.g. CCTV, with a focus on media credibility in the context of China. The data supports
that media credibility includes both professional and political dimensions. The dimension of political orientation is a unique one
developed directly in the context of China with empirical data support. This paper also explores contributing factors that impact
media credibility in the Chinese context, and finds positive impact of privately-owned website use on media credibility of
state-owned television.
Keywords: media credibility, website, television
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Dimensions of media credibility
- Research on media credibility in the context of China
- The impact of new media on the political system and traditional media in China
- The influences of economic forces and media ownership on media credibility in China
- Use of media and its impact on media credibility
- Demographics and conventional media credibility
- Research method
- Subjects
- 1.CCTV news
- 2.Sina website
- Measurements
- Sampling method and samples
- Subjects
- Results
- Factor analysis of CCTV news credibility
- Regression model about the impact of internet consumption on CCTV news credibility
- Discussions
- Future research
References
References (55)
Ang, Y. Y. (2014). Authoritarian Restraints on Online Activism Revisited Why “I-Paid-A-Bribe” Worked in India but Failed in China, Comparative Politics, 47(1):10.
Benett, W. L., L. Gressett & W. Haltom. (1985). Repairing the news: A Case Study of the News Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 35(2): 50–68.
Bentivegna, S. (2002). Politics and New Media. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs (pp. 50–61). London: Sage.
Boczkowski, P. J. (2001). Affording Flexibility: Transforming Information Practices in Online Newspapers, PhD thesis, Cornell University.
Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects Between On-air and Online News, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2): 247–64.
Breindl, Y. (2010). Critique of the Democratic Potentials of the Internet: A Review of Current Theory and Practice, Triple Cognition, Communication and co-operation, 8(1): 43–59.
Champlin, D. & J. Knoedler. (2002). Operating in the Public Interest or in Pursuit of Private Profits? News in the Age of Media Consolidation, Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2): 459–68.
Chan, J. M., Lee, F. L. & Pan, Z. (2006). Online news meets established journalism: How China’s journalists evaluate the credibility of news websites, New Media & Society, 8(6): 925–947.
Chan, J. M. & J. Qiu. (2002). Media Liberalization in Marketized Authoritarianism, in V. Price, B. Rozumilowicz and S. Verhulst (eds) Media Reform: Democratizating the Media, Democratizing the State, pp. 27–46. London: Routledge.
Chan, J. M., Z. Pan & F. L. F. Lee. (2003). Routinization of Internet Use: A Comparative Study of Shanghai and Hong Kong Journalists, in J. Qiu (ed.) Proceedings of the China Internet Conference, pp. 387–410. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
Chen, H. & Zhou, Q. (2000). Internet: We are in the same world – A summary of the journalism and communication in the time of digital communication, Journal of International Communication, 41, pp.31.
CNNIC (China Internet Network information Center) (2017). The 39th Statistic report on Chinese internet Development, Retrieved from: [URL]
Cohen, E. L. (2002). Online Journalism as Market-driven Journalism, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46(4): 532–48.
Couldry, N. (2003). Beyond the Hall of Mirrors? Some Theoretical reflections on the Global Contestation of Media Power, In N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp.39–55. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Little field.
Couldry, N. & J. Curran, (2003). The Paradox of Media Power, In N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp.3–16. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Little field.
Daekyung, K. & Thomas, J. J. (2009). Comparing Internet and Tradtional News Sources in South Korea sources, International Communication Gazette, (71: 28), 286.
Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of internet information credibility, Journalism & mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3): 515–540.
Garrison, B. (2000). Journalists’ Perceptions of Online Information-gathering Problems, Journalism and Mass communication Quarterly, 77 (3): 500–514.
Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462.
Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 561:147–67.
Hamdy, N. (2010). Arab media adopt citizen journalism to change the dynamics of conflict coverage. Global Media Journal Arabian Edition, 1(1): 3–15.
Hammond, S. C., D. Petersen & S. Thomsen. (2000). Print, Broadcast and Online Convergence in the Newsroom, Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 44(2): 16–26.
Hellmueller, L. & Trilling, D. (2012). The Credibility of Credibility Measures: A Meta-Analysis in Leading Communication Journals: 1951 to 2011, Paper presented at the WAPOR 65th Annual conference in Hong Kong, June, 2012.
Huang, C. (2014). From media sociology to communication sociology, The new trends of communication studies, Beijing: Tsinghua Univ. Press. p.331–354.
Izard, R. S. (1985). Public Confidence in the New Media, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 62(2): 247–255
Jacobson, H. K. (1966). Mass Media Believability: a Study of Receiver Judgments, Dissertation, Wisconsin University.
Johnson, T. J. & Kay, B. (1998). Cruising is believing?: comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2): 325–340.
Katz, E. (1996). And Deliver Us from Segmentation, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 546(1): 22–33.
Kiousis, S. (2001). Public Trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information Age, Mass Communication and Society, 41, 381–403.
Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231–252.
Luo, W. & Chen, S. (1993). A study of media reliability, Study report of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Luo, W., Lin, W., Niu, L. & Cai, Z. (2003). The influence of media dependency and media use on the reliability of election news: a comparison of five media, Journalism studies, 741.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. New York: New Press.
McCoy, M. E. (2001). Dark Alliance: News Repair and Institutional Authority in the age of the Internet, Journal of Communication, 51 (1): 164–93.
(1994). Mass Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R. & McCann, R. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: integrating perspectives on source, message and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In: Kalbfleisch, P. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, vol. 271. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 293–335.
Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 651:567–574.
Mulder, R. A. (1981). Log – linear analysis of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 581: 635–638.
Pan, Z. (2000). Spatial Configuration in Institutional Change: A Case of China’s Journalism Reforms, Journalism, 1(3): 253–81.
Pan, Z. & J. M. Chan. (2000). Building a Market-based Party Organ: Television and National Integration in the People’s Republic of China, in D. French and M. Richards (eds) Television in Contemporary Asia, pp. 232–63. New Delhi: Sage.
Pan, Z. & Y. Lu. (2003). Localizing Professionalism: Discursive Practices in China’s Media Reforms’, in C. C. Lee (ed.) Chinese Media, Global Context, pp. 215–36. London: Routledge.
Rimmer, T. & Weaver, D. (1987). Different questions, different answers? Media use and media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1): 28–36.
Stavenuiter, R., Trilling, D. & Bakker, T. P. (2012, February). The same old song? Reviewing factors that predict credibility of offline and online media. Paper presented at the Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap, Leuven, Belgium.
Teven, J. J. (2008). An Examination of Perceived Credibility of the 2008 Presidential Candidates: Relationships with Believability, likeability and Deceptiveness, Human Communication, 11 (4): 383–400.
Wanta, W. & Hu, H. W. (1994), The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: a path analysis model, Journalism Quarterly, 71(1): 90–98.
Weise, E. (1997). Does the Internet Change News Reporting? Not Quite, Media Studies Journal, 11 (2): 159–63.
West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: a covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1):159–168.
Yoon, Y. (2005). Examining journalists’ perceptions and news coverage of stem cell and cloning organizations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2): 281–300.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Liu, Jie, Wenjing Dong, Xinyu Wang & Gongjing Gao
Liu, Suhua, Wanqi Gong, Ting Zhou & Lei Chen
Tran, Huu Dat & Pham Phuong Uyen Diep
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
