Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 28:2 (2018) ► pp.323–344

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Justification and knowledge

Prospecting the modality of Indonesians’ informal political discussions on Facebook

 | University of Tehran
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00015.mol
Abstract
Everyday political talk, a significant type of political participation, is an important democratic activity. In this regard, the primary objective of this paper is to investigate the level of justification and knowledge in Indonesians’ informal political talk on Facebook. While previous studies addressed different aspects of informal political discussions such as their impact on political knowledge, influence on public opinion expression and relationship with news media use, they do not provide guidelines for analysing the modality of them. This study proposes an analytical framework for examining the users’ level of justification and knowledge. A qualitative content analysis reveals that only a small number of comments had a high level of justification and knowledge. In addition, some indications of the influence of Indonesian mainstream news media content were found on people’s arguments in discussions.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The meaning of justification and knowledge in this study
  • Research method
    • Content analysis
    • Case study
    • Sampling
    • Measurements
      • Operationalization of justification and political knowledge
    • Content categories
    • Unit of analysis
  • Findings: The pattern of using justification and political knowledge in Facebook discussions
    • Use of argument in Facebook political discussions
    • Use of reason in Facebook political discussions
    • Use of justification and knowledge in Facebook political discussions
      • Internal references devoid of background knowledge
      • External evidence
      • Internal and external references devoid of background knowledge
      • Internal references including background knowledge
      • Internal and external references including background knowledge
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (47)
References
Bailenson, J. N. & Rips, L. J. (1996). Informal reasoning and burden of proof. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 101, S3–SI6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ball, W. J. (1994). Using virgil to analyze public policy arguments: A system based on Toulmin’s informal logic. Social Science Computer Review, 12(1), 26–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brem, S. K. (2003). Structure and pragmatics in informal argument: circularity and question-begging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 147–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campus, D. (2012). Political discussion, opinion leadership and trust. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 46–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). Lakatos’ Scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753–1773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström, M. (2016). Young people’s everyday political talk: A social achievement of democratic engagement. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. B. T. & Thompson, V. A. (2004). Informal reasoning: Theory and method. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 69–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums. Javnost-The Public, 15(2), 17–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). The use of expressives in online political talk: Impeding or facilitating the normative goals of deliberation? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh & O. Glassey (Eds.), Electronic Participation (Vol. 62291, pp. 26–41): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, J. L., (2003). Public spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored- a comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(4), 349–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenski, K. & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 2006, pp. 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khumaini, A. (2009, November 25). Hakim akui ada upaya kriminalisasi terhadap KPK. Detiknews. Retrieved 23 March 2013 from [URL].
Kies, R. (2010). Promises and limits of web deliberation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2017). “Imagine we’re all in the living room talking about politics”: Israeili WhatsApp groups devoted to informal political talk. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kushin, M. J. & Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday, 14 (11). Retrieved 18 March 2013 from [URL].
Lee, F. L. F. (2005). The impact of ordinary political conversation on public opinion expression: Is existence of discord necessary? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 891–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The impact of political discussion in a democratizing society: The moderating role of disagreement and support for democracy. Communication Research, 36(3), 379–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, M. (2011). Facebook nation: The politics and culture of social media in Indonesia. Retrieved 16 February 2014 from [URL].
(2013). Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marti¬nez Guillem, S. (2009). Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society, 20(6), 727–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2010). Gender and the perception of knowledge in political discussion. Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 269–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nugroho, Y. & Syarief, S. S. (2012). Beyond click-activism? New media and political processes in contemporary Indonesia. Retrieved from [URL], 6 November 2013.
Pasandaran, C. & Hutapea, F. (2009, November 28). Indonesian corruption fighters’ careers hanging in legal limbo. The Jakarta Glob. Retrieved 23 March 2013 from [URL].
Pasandaran, C. & Rayda, N. (2009, November 26). Indonesian corruption fighters ready to climb back in the saddle. The Jakarta Glob. Retrieved 23 March 2013 from [URL].
Popkin, S. L. & Dimock, M. A. (1999). Political knowledge and citizen competence. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Sołtan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (pp. 117–146). Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania state University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, G. (2001). The Indonesian Language. Retrieved 5 September 2017 from [URL]
Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3-4), 347–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1998). Reasoning and conversation. Psychological review, 105(3), 411–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rips, L. J., Brem, S. K., & Bailenson, J. N. (1999). Reasoning dialogues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(6), 172–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sani, M. A. M. & Hara, A. B. E. (2007). Deliberative democracy in Malaysia and Indonesia: A comparison. Retrieved 6 November 2013 from [URL].
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 727–743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. (1986). Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith‐Hefner, N. J. (2007). Youth language, gaul sociability, and the new Indonesian middle class. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 17(2), 184–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Language shift, gender, and ideologies of modernity in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(1), 57–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 11, 21–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 1–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. (2006). Gender-linked differences in informal argument: Analyzing arguments in an online newspaper. Women’s Studies in Communication, 29(2), 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Syafirdi, D. (2009, November 25). MK kabulkan permohonan Bibit-Chandra. Retrieved 23 March 2013 from [URL].
Tanuhandaru, P. (2010, February 27). The Barack Obama statue: The lessons to be drawn. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 26 March 2013 from [URL].
Thompson, N., & Bell, D. R. (2006). Articulating political knowledge in deliberation. Contemporary Politics, 12(3-4), 287–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S. N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, S., Graham, T., & Jackson, D. (2016). Third space, social media and everyday political talk. The Routledge companion to social media and politics. New York: Taylor & Francis, 74–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Third Space and Everyday Online Political Talk: Deliberation, Polarisation, Avoidance. In: The 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, 25-29 May 2017, San Diego, CA, USA. (Unpublished).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Chan, Y. -Y., & Peng, Z. -M. (2008). Deliberativeness of online political discussion. Journalism Studies, 9(5), 759–770. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Hugo Marcos Marné, Manuel Goyanes & Rebecca Scheffauer
2024. Social Media Democracy Mirage, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue