Cover not available

Article published In: Strategic Communication: Beyond nation cultural adaption, images and identity
Edited by Hassan Abu Bakar and Bahtiar Bin Mohamad
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 28:1] 2018
► pp. 1–19

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Theorizing corporate-community relationships and the role of contextual factors in peacebuilding and beyond

 | The Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University
 | Department of Communication, University of Dayton
 | Department of Mass Communication, Advertising, and Public Relations, Boston University
 | The Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University
 | The Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University
Published online: 19 January 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00001.con
Abstract
The concept of relationships is one that is central to numerous subfields within communication, including interpersonal, organizational, and public relations. This conceptual paper investigates the notion of relationships and proposes a framework to understand and explicate corporate-community relationships (CCRs), a specific type of organization-public relationships (OPRs). In developing this framework, we draw upon existing literature and our experiences in Liberia related to natural resource management (NRM) as part of a multi-year collaborative peacebuilding initiative. We advance a framework of CCRs that (a) helps develop further empirical research and knowledge about these relationships and (b) contributes to the practice of more transformative relationships between Western and Asian multinational corporations (MNCs) and local communities in West Africa and beyond. This framework puts forth our conceptualization of CCRs as (a) constituted by the communicative, (b) dynamic, constantly influenced by macro and micro factors, and (c) complex. Drawing on our framework, we also advance some guiding questions for a research agenda in this area.
Article outline
  • Literature review
    • Problematizing and conceptualizing relationships
    • Organization-public relationships
    • Corporate-community relationships
    • Moving the Broom et al. (1997) framework forward
  • The Purdue Peace Project: A lens through which to unpack CCRs
    • CCR and NRM: Asia-Pacific and Western corporations in Liberia
  • A framework of corporate-community relationships
    • Contextual factors
      • Historical factors
      • Structural discrepancies
      • Discourses
      • Social and cultural norms
      • Legal/voluntary necessity of the relationship
    • Antecedents
    • Relationships
    • Consequences
  • An agenda for future research
    • How do contextual factors influence the ways in which CCRs are perceived, talked about, and constituted?
      • Post-positivists
      • Interpretivists
      • Critical and feminist scholars
    • How are relationships constituted by the cognitive and interactional perceptions of actors?
      • Post-positivists
      • Interpretivists
      • Critical and feminist scholars
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (34)
References
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 531, 1125–1149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashcraft, K. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 31, 1–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakar, H. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2009). Relationships between supervisory communication and commitment to workgroup: A multilevel analysis approach. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 41, 39–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. Journal of communication, 541, 645–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 91, 83–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 821, 793–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casey, S. (1997). A framework for studying organization-public relationships: Measuring relationship state and process. Unpublished master’s thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dozier, D. M., & Lauzen, M. M. (2000). Liberating the intellectual domain from the practice: Public relations, activism, and the role of the scholar. Journal of Public Relations Research, 121, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1973). Personal relationships and personal constructs: A study of friendship formation. London: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, M. R. (2006). Corporate philanthropy and corporate community relations: Measuring relationship-building results. Journal of Public Relations Research, 181, 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallahan, K. (2004). “Community” as a foundation for public relations theory and practice. In P. J. Kalbfeisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (vol. 281, pp. 233–279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 141, 575–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y. H. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 131, 61–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y. H. & Zhang, Y. (2013). Revisiting organization-public relations research over the past decade: Theoretical concepts, measures, methodologies and challenges. Public Relations Review, 391, 85–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemp, D. (2010). Community relations in the global mining industry: exploring the internal dimensions of externally oriented work. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 171, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 281, 21–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ki, E. J., & Shin, J. H. (2006). Status of organization – public relationship research from an analysis of published articles, 1985–2004. Public Relations Review, 321, 194–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lederach, J. P. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 241, 55–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberia: Sime Darby labeled ‘slave camp.’ (2013, February 25). New Democrat. Retrieved from [URL]
Maclean, R. (2016, July 14). Liberia must pass land rights bill or risk jeopardizing peace, campaigners warn. The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]
Maguire, K., & Connaughton, S. L. (2011). A cross-contextual examination of technologically mediated communication and presence in long distance relationships. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.)., Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 244–265). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muthuri, J. N. (2007). Corporate Citizenship and Sustainable Community Development. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 281, 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, L. (2001). Shifting voices, oppositional discourse, and new visions for communication studies. Journal of Communication, 511, 38–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shumate, M., & Contractor, N. (2014). The emergence of multidimensional social networks. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 449–474). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sias, P. M. (2014). Workplace relationships. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 375–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shome, R., & Hegde, R. S. (2002). Postcolonial approaches to communication: Charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 121, 249–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigman, S. J. (1991). Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuing social relationships: Toward research of the persistence of social forms. Communication Theory, 11, 106–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, B. G. (2012). Public relations identity and the stakeholder – organization relationship: A revised theoretical position for public relations scholarship. Public Relations Review, 381, 838–845. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tourish, D., & Barge, J. K. (2010). An exchange of letters: What can a specifically social constructionist perspective bring to bear on what must be one of the most studied subjects in human history. Management Communication Quarterly, 241, 322–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weedee, E. (2013, November 8). Liberia: The aftermath of workers’ protest at Sime Darby. Heritage. Retrieved from [URL]
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Seeger, Henry S.
2022. A Meta‐Theoretical Orientation to Crisis Communication. In The Handbook of Crisis Communication, ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue