Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority

Green, Nancy L.

doi:10.1075/jaic.6.2.10gre

Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.271–275

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Book review

Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority

Reviewed by

Nancy L. Green | University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Published online: 27 October 2017

https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.2.10gre

References (7)

References

Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R.. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Genetic Counseling 111, 399–418.

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2002a). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131–159.

(2002b). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. Newport New: Vale Press, pp. 13–28.

Green, N. L. (2012). Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1(1), 113–129.

Green, N., Dwight, R., Navoraphan, K., & Stadler, B. (2011). Natural language generation of transparent arguments for lay audiences. Argument and Computation 21, 23–50.

Green, N. & Stadler, B. (2013). Adding coping-related strategies to biomedical argumentation in computer-generated genetic counseling patient letters. Patient Education and Counseling 92(2), 149–152.