Eugen Octav Popa. Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes. Doctoral Dissertation.University of Amsterdam, 2016.

Reviewed by

Zohar Livnat

Published online: 27 January 2017

https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.3.05liv

References (6)

References

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris.

. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. 1977a. A function for thought experiments. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 240–265. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

(1977b). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition, 225–240. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Norton, J. D. (1996). Are thought experiments just what you thought? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3): 333–366.