Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 5:3 (2016) ► pp.227–248
Mitt Romney in Denver
“Obamacare” as ideological enthymeme
Published online: 27 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.3.01kir
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.3.01kir
This paper argues that surface-level analysis of political argument fails to explain the effectiveness of ideological enthymemes, particularly within the context of presidential debates. This paper uses the first presidential debate of the 2012 election as a case study for the use of “Obamacare” as an ideological enthymeme. The choice of a terminological system limits and shapes the argumentative choices afforded the candidate. Presidential debates provide a unique context within which to examine the interaction of ideological constraints and argument due to their relatively committed and ideologically homogenous audiences.
Keywords: Barack Obama, ideology, enthymeme, public address, Obamacare, Mitt Romney, presidential debates
References (62)
Alter, Jonathan. 2013. “Obama’s Choke Revisited.” New Republic, May 29, 2013, [URL].
Balz, Dan, and Philip Rucker. 2012. “Obama and Romney Campaigns Seek Breakthrough Strategy.” The Washington Post, September 8, 2012, [URL].
Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser. 2003. “A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70 (4): 335–350.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1959. “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (4): 399–408.
Boydstun, Amber E., Rebecca A. Glazier, and Matthew T. Pietryka. 2013. “Playing to the Crowd: Agenda Control in Presidential Debates.” Political Communication 30 (2): 254–277.
Bradberry, Leigh A., and Gary C. Jacobson. 2014. “The Tea Party and the 2012 Presidential Election.” In press at Electoral Studies, available online October 7, 2014, [URL].
. 1974. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ceccarelli, Leah. 1998. “Polysemy: Multiple Meanings in Rhetorical Criticism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 84 (4): 395–415.
Conley, Thomas M. 1984. “The Enthymeme in Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (2): 168–187.
Cook, Ian P. 2012. Tuning the Dog Whistle. Preliminary paper draft, April 1, 2012, [URL]
. 2013. Dog Whistling. Preliminary paper draft, [URL].
Cox, Amanda, Alicia Desantis, Alicia Parlapiano, and Jeremy White. 2012. “Fighting to control the meaning of ‘Obamacare.’” The New York Times, March 26, 2012: A12.
Crummy, Karen E. 2012a. “President Obama, Mitt Romney Ready to Duel in Denver.” Denver Post, October 3, 2012: A2S.
. 2012b. “Will the Debate be a Game Changer?” Denver Post, October 2, 2012, [URL].
Delia, Jesse G. 1970. “The Logic Fallacy, Cognitive Theory, and the Enthymeme: A Search for the Foundations of Reasoned Discourse.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 56 (2): 140–148.
Fallows, James. 2012. “Slugfest: Sizing up the Obama-Romney Debates.” National Journal, August 23, 2012, [URL].
Fitzgerald, Thomas. 2012. “Debates Often Not ‘Game-Changers’ but that’s what Romney Needs.” The Seattle Times, September 29, 2012, [URL].
Grant, David. 2012. “Hurricane Isaac Delays Start of Republican National Convention in Tampa.” Christian Science Monitor, August 25, 2012, [URL].
Guzder, Deena. 2012. “Chaos on the Convention Floor as RNC Blocks Ron Paul Delegates, Alters Seating Rules.” Democracy Now! August 29, 2012, [URL].
Haberman, Maggie. 2012. “5 takeaways from the Denver Debate.” Politico, October 4, 2012, [URL].
Haney-López, Ian. 2014. Dog whistle politics: how coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harnden, Toby. 2012. “Obama ‘believed he had BEATEN Romney’ in Denver debate - after ignoring advice of top aides on preparation.” The Daily Mail, October 9, 2012, [URL].
Hiland, Al. 2015. “Polysemic argument: Mitt Romney in the 2012 Primary Debates.” In Disturbing Argument, ed. by Catherine H. Palczewski, 168–173. New York, NY: Routledge.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1999. “Political Learning from Presidential Debates.” Political Behavior 21 (1): 67–89.
Ingold, John. 2012. “Romney Repeatedly Batters Obama in Presidential Debate at DU.” The Denver Post, October 4, 2012, [URL].
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and David S. Birdsell. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
John F. Kennedy, School of Government. 2013. Campaign for President: The Managers Look at 2012. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Khimm, Suzy. 2012. “The truth about Romney’s ‘six studies.’” The Washington Post, October 16, 2012, [URL].
Krebs, Justin. 2012. “Obama’s Flat, Romney Fibs: The First Debate that Wasn’t.” WNYC, October 4, 2012, [URL].
Lanigan, Richard L. 1974. “Enthymeme: The Rhetorical Species of Aristotle’s Syllogism.” Southern Journal of Communication 39 (3):207–222.
Lee, M.J. 2012. “Clint Eastwood Delivers Rambling RNC Speech.” Politico, August 30, 2012, [URL].
Lenz, Gabriel S., and Chappell Lawson. 2011. “Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 574–589.
Levinson, Alexis. 2012. “Romney Tempers Debate Expectations.” Daily Caller, October 2, 2012, [URL].
MacAskill, Ewen. 2012a. “Mitt Romney Comes Out on Top as Obama Stumbles in First Debate.” The Guardian, October 4, 2012, [URL].
MacAskill, Ewan. 2012b. “Romney and Obama Curtail Debate Expectations Ahead of First Meeting.” The Guardian, September 30, 2012, [URL].
Madden, Edward H. 1952. “The Enthymeme: Crossroads of Logic, Rhetoric, and Metaphysics.” The Philosophical Review 61 (3):368–376.
Marinucci, Carla, and Joe Garofoli. 2012. “Romney, Obama Square off in Polite Debate.” San Francisco Chronicle, October 3, 2012, [URL].
Martin, Jonathan, and Maggie Haberman. 2012. “Denver Debate Do-or-Die for Mitt Romney.” Politico, September 27, 2012, [URL].
McBurney, James H. 1936. “The Place of the Enthymeme in Rhetorical Theory.” Communications Monographs 3 (1):49–74.
McGee, Michael C. 1980. “The ‘Ideograph’: A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (1):1–16.
Medved, Michael. 2012. “Obama’s Big Whimper: Four Big Surprises from the Denver Debate.” The Daily Beast, October 4, 2012, [URL].
Metzler, Rebekah. 2012. “Obama, Romney Get Ready to Rumble in Denver.” US News and World Report, October 3, 2012, [URL].
McKinney, Mitchell S., and Benjamin R. Warner. 2013. “Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects.” Argumentation and Advocacy 49 (4): 238–258.
National Public Radio. 2012. “Transcript and Audio: First Obama-Romney Debate.” Federal News Service, October 3, 2012, [URL].
NBC News. 2012. “NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey.” Hart/McInturff Polling, September 19, 2012, [URL].
O’Brien, Matthew. 2012. “The 6 Studies Paul Ryan cited Prove Mitt Romney’s Tax Plan is Impossible.” The Atlantic, October 12, 2012, [URL].
Rowland, Robert C. 2013. “The First 2012 Presidential Campaign Debate: The Decline of Reason in Presidential Debates.” Communication Studies 64 (5): 528–547.
Rueckert, William H. 1982. Kenneth Burke and the Drama of Human Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sarlin, Benjy. 2012. “Romney: Obama Puts us on Path to Europe – or California.” Talking Points Memo, September 21, 2012, [URL].
Schlesinger, Robert. 2012. “Romney’s Tax Plan Doesn’t Obey the Laws of Mathematics.” US News and World Report, October 17, 2012, [URL].
Stelter, Brian. 2012. “Not Waiting for Pundits’ Take, Web Audience Scores the Candidates in an Instant.” New York Times, October 4, 2012: A22.
Talev, Margaret, and Julianna Goldman. 2012. “Obama Dueling Romney with Europe Debt Crisis as the Foil.” Bloomberg, June 6, 2012, [URL].
Tau, Byron. 2012. “Gore Blames Obama Debate Performance on Denver’s Altitude.” Politico, October 4, 2012, [URL].
Whitley, Stephen. 2014. ‘Dog-whistle’ Rhetoric: Pedagogy and the Coded Language of Modern American Politics. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University-Commerce.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
