Article published In: Argumentation in Journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere
Edited by Corina Andone and Andrea Rocci
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1] 2016
► pp. 9–28
Arguing with oneself
The writing process as an argumentative soliloquy
Published online: 24 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1.01zam
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1.01zam
Argumentation is generally conceived of as a dialogic activity between two or more participants. Nonetheless, it operates also at an intrapersonal level (Rocci 2005), in a soliloquy where protagonist and antagonist of the critical discussion are embodied in the same person. We argue this case by analyzing journalists’ argumentation about linguistic choices in newswriting processes. Empirically, we draw on data generated with progression analysis (Perrin 2003), in particular with cue-based retrospective verbal protocols. The data was produced by the journalists under investigation when they, while watching video recordings of their text production processes, reconstructed and verbalized their decisions (Perrin 2011: 60). In the detail analysis, we focus on one editorial by an experienced journalist of Corriere del Ticino, the main Italian-language newspaper in Switzerland.
References (40)
Aakhus, Mark. 2007. “Conversations for Reflection: Augmenting Transitions and Transformations in Expertise”. In Rethinking Knowledge Management, ed. by Claire R. McInerney and Ronald E. Day, 1–20. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer
Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Topica, ed. and transl. by Hugh Tredennick and Harold North Fowler. Cambridge/ London: Harvard University Press.
. Art of Rhetoric, ed. by Jeffrey Henderson, transl. by John H. Freese. Cambridge, Massachussetts/ London: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 2006 [1935]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Billig, Michael. 1996 [1987]. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1959. “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 451: 399–408.
Burger, Marcel, & Delaloye, Laura (this issue). The Framing of Argumentation in the Making of a Political Editorial: From Normative Expectations to Stylistic Credo of the Journalists. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
Clayman, Stephen E., and Ann Reisner. 1998. “Gatekeeping in Action: Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness”. American Sociological Review 631: 178–199.
Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News Talk. Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dascal, Marcelo. 2005. “Debating with Myself and Debating with Others”. In Controversies and Subjectivity, ed. by Pierluigi Barrotta and Marcelo Dascal, 33–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gravengaard, Gitte, and Lene Rimestad. 2011. “Elimination of Ideas and Professional Socialisation”. Journalism Practice 6 (4): 465–481.
. 2014. “Socializing Journalist Trainees in the Newsroom. On How to Capture the Intangible Parts of the Process.” Nordicom Review 351: 91–95.
Greco Morasso, Sara. 2013. “Multivoiced Decisions. A Study of Migrants’ Inner Dialogue and its Connection to Social Argumentation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 21 (1): 55–80.
Hample, Dale, Warner, Ben, and Dorian Young. 2009. “Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments.” Argumentation 231: 21–37.
Larrain, Antonia, and Andrés Haye. 2012. “The discursive nature of inner speech.” Theory & Psychology 22 (1): 3–22.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 2010 [1958]. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly. 2000. La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale. Bern [etc.]: Peter Lang.
Perrin, Daniel. 2003. “Progression Analysis (PA): Investigating Writing Strategies at the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (6): 907–921.
. 2013. The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2005. “Congruity Theory and Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction. 75–96.
. 2006. “Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage.” Argumentation 201: 519–540.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2009. “Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource.” In Argumentation and Education, ed. by Natalie Muller Mirza and Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 9–66. Dordrecht: Springer.
. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512.
. In preparation. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-based Approach to Argument Schemes. To be submitted to Springer Argumentation Library.
Rocci, Andrea. 2005. “Connective Predicates in Monologic and Dialogic Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction. 97–118.
Ruhmann, Gabriela, and Daniel Perrin. 2002. “Schreibstrategien in Balance. Was Wissenschaftler von Journalistinnen lernen können.” In Schreiben. Von intuitiven zu professionellen Schreibstrategien, ed. by Daniel Perrin, Ingrid Boettcher, Otto Kruse and Arne Wrobel, 129–138. Wiesbaden [etc.]: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Schön, Donald A. 2007 [1983]. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tuchman, Gaye. 1974. “Making News by Doing Work: Routinizing the Unexpected.” American Journal of Sociology 79 (1): 110–131.
Vygotsky, Lev. 1962 [1934]. Thought and Language, ed. and transl. by Eugenia Hanfmann, and Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press and New York/ London: Wiley.
Zampa, Marta. 2015. News values as endoxa of newsmaking. An investigation of argumentative practices in the newsroom. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Lugano: Università della Svizzera italiana.
Zampa, Marta, and Marina Bletsas. forthcoming. “On the Production of a Multimodal News Item: An Argumentative Approach.” Semiotica: Argumentation and Multimodality.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Merminod, Gilles & Lauri Haapanen
Whitehouse, Marlies
Bletsas, Marina
2022. Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
Svačinová, Iva
2022. Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Haapanen, Lauri
Burger, Marcel & Richard Fitzgerald
Baumtrog, Michael D.
Zampa, Marta & Marina Bletsas
Greco, Sara
Palmieri, Rudi
Perrin, Daniel
Perrin, Daniel
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
