Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 4:2 (2015) ► pp.133–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

“This is the cheese bought by Grandpa”

A study of the arguments from authority used by parents with their children during mealtime conversations

 | Utrecht University
Published online: 29 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.2.01bov
This paper aims to examine how parents use the argument from authority and its effectiveness to persuade their children to accept rules and prescriptions during mealtimes. Using the model of a critical discussion integrated with the Argumentum Model of Topics as analytical approach, a corpus of 31 arguments from authority advanced by parents were analyzed. The results of this study show that parents always refer to an adult as source of authority. This is mostly themselves (self-oriented argument), and, less frequently, a third party (other-oriented argument) such as a grandparent or a child’s teacher. In light of these results, it is reasonable to assume that for the parents the reference to themselves is a more effective argument than the reference to a third party. However, in the corpus the children are more prone to accept their parents’ argumentation when the authority is another adult and not one of their parents.
References (54)
Andone, Corina. 2012. “The Reasonableness of Confrontational Strategic Maneuvering in Political Interviews.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by van Eemeren Frans H. and Garssen Bart, 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
APA. 2009. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (6th edition). New York, NY: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova. 2011. “Argumentative Strategies for Conflict Management and Resolution in Italian and Swiss Families.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 301: 1385–1389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives during mealtime conversations: Differences and similarities in children of 3-5 and 6-9 years old.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 61:40–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arcidiacono, Francesco, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2009. “Family Conversations: The Relevance of Context in Evaluating Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2): 79–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronsson, Karin. 1998. “Identity-in-Interaction and Social Choreography.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1): 75–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronsson, Karin, and Asta Cekaite. 2011. “Activity Contracts and Directives in Everyday Family politics.” Discourse and Society 22 (2): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aukrust, Vibeke G., and Catherine E. Snow. 1998. “Narratives and Explanations during Mealtime Conversations in Norway and the U.S.” Language in Society 27 (2): 221–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigi, Sarah. 2012. “Contextual Constraints on Argumentation. The Case of the Medical Encounter”. In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 289–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono. 2013a. “Investigating Children’s Why-questions. A Study Comparing Argumentative and Explanatory Function.” Discourse Studies 15 (6): 713–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b.”Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23 (3): 206–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “You must eat the Salad because it is Nutritious. Argumentative Strategies adopted by Parents and Children in Food-related Discussions at Mealtimes.” Appetite 731: 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brumark, Åsa. 2006. “Argumentation at the Swedish Family Dinner Table.” In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Anthony J. Blair, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, and Charles A. Willards, 513–520. Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Eat your Hamburger! — No, I don’t Want to! Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families.” Argumentation 22 (2): 251–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, Judy, and Penny Munn. 1987. “Developmental of Justification in Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 23 (6): 791–798. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2003. “The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation.” Argumentation 17 (4): 387–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick. 1988. “Discourse Coherence, Participation Structure and Personal Display in a Family Dinner Table Conversation.” Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 4 (1): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “The Social Construction of Discourse Coherence in a Family Dinner Table Conversation.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 207–238. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felton, Mark, and Deanna Kuhn. 2001. “The Development of Argumentative Discourse Skills.” Discourse Processes 32 (2&3): 135–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiese, Barbara H., Kimberly P. Foley, and Mary Spagnola. 2006. “Routine and Ritual Elements in Family Mealtimes: Contexts for Child Well-being and Family Identity.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1111: 67–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A. 1961. “Snowball Sampling.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1): 148–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Contextual Frames and their Argumentative Implications: A Case-study in Media Argumentation.” Discourse Studies 14 (2): 197–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heckathorn, Douglas D. 1997. “Respondent-driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations.” Social Problems 44 (2): 174–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Respondent-driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Estimates from Chain-referral Samples of Hidden Populations.” Social Problems 49 (1): 11–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Sally Hester. 2010. “Conversational Actions and Category Relations: An Analysis of a Children’s Argument.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 33-48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laforest, Marty. 2002. “Scenes of Family Life: Complaining in Everyday conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1595–1620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurier, E., and Sally Wiggins. 2011. “Finishing the Family Meal. The Interactional Organisation of Satiety.” Appetite 56 (1): 53–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Merav Shohet. 2006. “The Cultural Structuring of Mealtime Socialization.” In Family Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization, ed. by Reed W. Larson, Angela R. Wiley, and Kathryn R. Branscomb, 35–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith, and Carolyn Taylor. 1989. “Detective Stories at Dinnertime: Problem-Solving through Co-narration.” Cultural Dynamics 2 (2): 238–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmieri, Rudi. 2012. “The Diversifying of Contextual Constraints and Argumentative Strategies in Friendly and Hostile Takeover Bids.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Barbara. A., Rivka Y. Perlmann, and Catherine E. Snow. 2000. “Food for thought: Dinner Table as a Context for Observing Parent-Child Discourse.” In Methods for Studying Language Production, ed. by Lise Menn and Nan B. Ratner, 205–224. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Gerald R., and Marion S. Forgatch, 1995. “Predicting Future Clinical Adjustment from Treatment Outcome and Process Variables.” Psychological Assessment 7 (3): 275–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Francesco Arcidiacono. 2007. Famiglie all’italiana: parlare a tavola. Milan: Cortina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Alessandra Fasulo. 1997. “Learning to Argue in Family Shared Discourse: The Reconstruction of Past Events.” In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, Roger Saljo, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Barbara Burge, 406–442. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Planning a Typical Italian Meal: A Family Reflection on Culture.” Culture Psychology 5 (3): 313–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Sabine Pirchio. 2000.“A Developmental View on Children’s Arguing: The Need of the other.” Human Development 43 (6): 361–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo. 2009. “Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived within Contemporary Argumentation Theory.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 157–178. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24 (4): 489-512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rundquist, Suellen. 1992. “Indirectness: A Gender Study of Flouting Grice’s Maxims.” Journal of Pragmatics 18 (5): 431–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slomkowski, Cheryl L., and Judy Dunn. 1992. “Arguments and Relationships within the Family: Differences in Young Children’s Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 28 (5): 919–924. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., and Elizabeth R. Albro. 2001. “The Origins and Nature of Arguments: Studies in Conflict Understanding, Emotion and Negotiation.” Discourse Processes 32 (2–3): 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., and Christopher A. Miller. 1993. “The Development of Memory and Reasoning Skill in Argumentative Contexts: Evaluating, Explaining, and Generating Evidence.” In Advances in Instructional Psychology, ed. by Robert Glaser, 285–335. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura. (2003). “Account Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday Interaction.” Discourse Studies 5 (1): 79–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). “Accountability in Family Discourse: Socialization into Norms and Standards and Negotiation of Responsibility in Italian Dinner Conversations.” Childhood 16 (4): 441–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally. 2002. “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 311–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Social Life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as Assessment in Family Mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology 52 (3): 489–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Kucirkova, Natalia & Jarmila Bubikova-Moan
2025. Parent–Child Mealtime Conversations Stimulated with Decorated Tableware. Early Childhood Education Journal 53:7 ► pp. 2591 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Xian-Ju, Chun-Chun Shen-Tu & Chunhong Liu,
2025. Argumentative style of parent-child interactions: A case study. PLOS ONE 20:3 ► pp. e0318310 ff. DOI logo
Bubikova-Moan, Jarmila & Margareth Sandvik
2022. Argumentation in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review. Human Development 66:6 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2019. A Qualitative Methodology for Studying Parent–Child Argumentation. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation, ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2019. Prevailing Arguments and Types of Conclusions of Parent–Child Argumentation. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation, ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2019. Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2021. Dialogical construction of parental feeding strategies during family mealtimes. Journal of Health Psychology 26:10 ► pp. 1684 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2021. Co-construction of argumentative discussions between parents and children during mealtime conversations. A pragma-dialectical analysis. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 29 ► pp. 100519 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio, Francesco Arcidiacono & Fabrice Clément
2017. The transmission of what is taken for granted in children’s socialization. In Argumentation across communities of practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2016. The argument from expert opinion as other-oriented reference in disciplinary discussions. Studies in Communication Sciences 16:2 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2020. Analyser les échanges discursifs entre parents et enfants par la reconstruction argumentative. Revue internationale de l'éducation familiale n° 46:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue