Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:3 (2014) ► pp.287–321

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Suspicion as an argumentative move

Semantic analysis of a pivotal concept in banks’ anti-money laundering argumentative activities

 | University of Lugano
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.3.03pal
In order to comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws, financial intermediaries are being engaged with unprecedented communicative activities, mainly oriented at detecting suspicious activities which must be reported to the Financial Intelligence Unit. The polysemous notion of ‘suspicion’ is pivotal to these communicative activities and needs to be clarified in order to establish to what extent argumentation is involved in their fulfillment. To this purpose, we apply the method of semantic analysis developed within Congruity Theory bringing to light the different semantic values of the verb ‘to suspect’ and its lexical derivates in a corpus of ordinary English; then we compare these meanings with the actual uses of this verb in the international and national AML laws. Amongst the numerous factors contributing to the polysemy of this word, we focalize on the difference emerged between an argumentative value of ’to suspect’ and another meaning in which suspicion is reduced to a mere hunch. This suggests that there exist different types of suspicion acts which are more or less argumentative. Interestingly, anti-money laundering international standards and some national implementations seem to admit suspicions at different argumentative degrees, entailing different levels of critical assessment expected from the financial intermediary. We also identify important implications for bank’s anti-money laundering activities deriving from the different semantic traits emerged in the analysis. We conclude the paper by eliciting from the outcome of the semantic analysis a number of questions that will guide the next steps of an ongoing research project in which Swiss banks’ AML practices are investigated from an argumentative perspective.
References (52)
Barberis, N., and R. Thaler. 2003. “A Survey of Behavioral Finance.” In Handbook of the Economics of Finance, ed. by G.M. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R.M. Stulz, 1053–1128. Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaikin, D. 2009. “How Effective are Suspicious Transaction Reporting Systems?” Journal of Money Laundering Control 12 (3): 238–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cigada, S. 2008. Les émotions dans le discours de la construction européenne. Milano: Diritto allo studio, Università Cattolica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cottier, B., and R. Palmieri. 2008. “From Trust to Betrayal.” Communication Director 41: 80–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Wit, J. 2007. “A Risk-based Approach to AML&CTF. A Controversy Between Financial Institutions and Regulators.” Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 15 (2): 156–165 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H van, and R. Grootendorst. 1999. “The Fallacy of Composition and Division.” In J.F.A.K. Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday, 111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F.H. van, and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H, and B. Garssen. 2009. “The Fallacies of Composition and Division Revisited.” Cogency 1 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Favarel-Garrigues, G., T. Godefroy, and P. Lascoumes. 2009. Les sentinelles de l’argent sale. Les banques aux prises avec l’antiblanchiment. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. 1976. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech 2801: 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Forms and Meaning in Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force. 2009. “Methodology for Assessing Compliance with the FATF 40 Recommendations and the FATF 9 Special Recommendations.” [URL]
Geiger, H., and O. Wuensch. 2007. “The Fight Against Money Laundering – An Economic Analysis of a Cost-Benefit Paradoxon.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 10 (1): 91–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, S. 2003. “When Presupposing Becomes Dangerous. How the Procedure of Presuppositional Accommodation Can be Exploited in Manipulative Discourses.” Studies in Communication Sciences 3 (2): 217–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, S. 2008. “The Ontology of Conflict”. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(3): 540–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, D.A. 1994. “Factors for Reasonable Suspicion: When Black and Poor Means Stopped and Frisked.” Indiana Law Journal 69 (3): 659–688.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healy, P.M., and K.G. Palepu. 2001. “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 311: 405–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Killick, M., and D. Parody. 2007. “Implementing AML&CTF/CFT Measures that Address the Risks and Not Tick Boxes.” Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 15 (2): 210–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, C.S. 2006. “Reasonable Suspicion and Mere Hunches.” Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (2): 407–473.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miecznikowski, J., and G. Zlatkova. 2009. “Italian Sembra/pare vs. Sembrerebbe/parrebbe: Modal, Evidential and Argumentative Aspects.” Paper presented at the ‘Chronos 9’ international conference, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris 7, 2-4 September 2009.
Mel’čuk, I. 2004. “Actants in Semantics and Syntax II: Actants in Syntax.” Linguistics 42 (2): 247–291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmieri, R. 2009. “Regaining Trust Through Argumentation in the Context of the Current Financial-Economic Crisis.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2): 59–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Bankers’ Decision-Making in the Reporting of Money Laundering Suspicions.” Paper presented at the Thematic conference on practical reasoning. Argupolis doctoral program, Lugano, USI, 29. XI.2012.
Palmieri, R. & C. Palmieri. 2012. “Text Types, Activity Types and the Genre System of Financial Communication.” In Les discoures de la bourse et de la finance, ed. by L. Gautier, 85–105. Forum Für Fachsprachen-Forschung. Berlin: Frank und Timme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queloz, N. 2007. “Dispositifs de contrôle du blanchiment d’argent. Eléments d’analyse du dispositif suisse et premiers points de comparaison avec le dispositif canadien.” Revue suisse de criminologie 6 (1): 33–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees, A.M. van. 2009. Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees, A.M. van, & E. Rigotti. 2011. “The Analysis of the Strategic Function of Presentational Techniques.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by E. Feteris, B. Garssen, and F. Snoeck Henkemans. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinle, M. 2007. Die Meldepflicht im Geldwäschereigesetz: die Banken im Spannungsfeld zwischen Geldwäschereibekämpfung und Vertrauensverhältnis zum Bankkunden. Zürich: Dike.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E. 1993. “La sequenza testuale”. L’analisi linguistica e letteraria 11: 43–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “La linguistica tra le scienze della comunicazione.” In Linguistica e nuove professioni, ed. by A. Giacalone-Ramat, E. Rigotti, and A. Rocci. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Towards a typology of manipulative processes”. In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twenthieth century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by L. Saussure, and P. Schulz, 61–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Locus a causa finali.” In G. Gobber, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M.C. Gatti & S. Gilardoni (eds). Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Special issue of L’analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI1, 2008/2: 559–576.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Gli agganci *forici nella struttura dei connettivi testuali.” In Tra pragmatica e linguistica testuale, ed. by F. Venier, 421–440. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E. & S. Cicada. 2004. La comunicazione verbale. Milano: Apogeo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2001. “Sens – Non-sens – Contresens. Tentative d’une Définition Explicative.” Studies in Communication Sciences 11: 45–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E. and A. Rocci. 2006a. “Towards a Definition of Communication Context. Foundations of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Communication.” Studies in Communication Sciences (special issue): 155–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, A. and A. Rocci. 2006b. “Tema-Rema e connettivo: la congruità semantico-pragmatica del testo.” In Sýndesmoi. I connettivi nella realtà del testo, ed. by G. Gobber. Milano: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2006c. Le signe linguistique comme structure intermédiaire.” In Nouveaux Regards sur Saussure. Mélanges offerts à René Amacker ed. by Louis de Saussure, 219–247. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., A. Rocci, and S. Greco. 2006. “The Semantic of Reasonableness.” In Considering Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by P. Houtlosser, and A. van Rees, 257–274. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., A. Rocci, and S. Greco Morasso. 2012. “From Semantics to Speech Acts in Context. Introduction to a Semantic Analysis Procedure Supported by Congruity Theory. Argupolis e-Learning Module.” The paper can be requested by writing to argupolis@usi.ch.
Rocci, A. 2005. “Are Manipulative Texts Coherent? Manipulation, Presuppositions, and (in-)Congruity.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twenthieth century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by L. Saussure, and P. Schulz, 85–112 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, S., and M. Hannan. 2007. “Money Laundering Regulation and Risk-Based Decision-making.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 10 (1): 106–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, L. 2001. Normiertes Misstrauen. Der Verdacht im Strafverfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 2000. “State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation.” Argumentation 141: 447–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treddenick, H., and E.S. Forster. 1960. Aristotle. Topica. Cambridge (Mass.)/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhage, A. 2009a. “Between the Hammer and the Anvil? The Anti-money Laundering-complex and its Interactions with the Compliance Industry.” Crime, Law and Social Change 521: 9–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Compliance and AML&CTF in Belgium: A Booming Sector with Growing Pains.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 12 (2): 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D.N., and F. Macagno. 2009. “Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions.” Argumentation 231: 81–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, J., and C. Lombardini. 2007. “L’obligation subsidiarie d’annonce et de denonciation des.” “OAR LBA”. AJP/PJA 91: 1096–1104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Palmieri, Rudi & Ekaterina Balabanova
2025. Framing and Argumentative Strategies in Modern Slavery Statements: Debating Sustainability or Avoiding Responsibility?. In Strategic Sustainability Communication [CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, ], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Amicelle, Anthony & Vanessa Iafolla
2018. Suspicion-in-the-making: Surveillance and Denunciation in Financial Policing. The British Journal of Criminology 58:4 ► pp. 845 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue