Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.199–218
Book review
. Exploring Argumentative Contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2012.
Reviewed by
Published online: 22 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.2.05rig
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.2.05rig
References (12)
1999. “Metadiscourse, Theory, and Practice.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 32 (1–2): 21–29.
van Eemeren, F. H., 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feteris, E. T. 1999. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gilboa, E. 1998. “Media Diplomacy Conceptual Divergence and Applications.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 3 (3): 56–75.
Manzin, M. 2006. “Justice, Argumentation and Truth in Legal Reasoning: In Memory of Enrico Opocher (1914–2004).” In Interpretazione Giuridica e Retorica Forense: Il Problema Della Vaghezza Del Linguaggio Nella Ricerca Della Verità Processuale, ed. by M. Manzin, and P. Somaggio, 163–174. Milano: Giuffré.
2010. “La Verità Retorica Del Diritto.” In Diritto e Verità, Trans. by M. Manzin, ed. by D. Patterson, 9–51. Milano: Giuffré.
Rigotti, E., and S. G. Morasso. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512.
Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2006. “Towards a Definition of Communication Context.” Studies in Communication Sciences 6 (2).
