Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.169–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Analogical reasoning in public health

 | Nottingham Trent University
Published online: 22 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.2.04cum
Analogical reasoning is a valuable logical resource in a public health context. It is used extensively by public health scientists in risk assessments of new technologies, environmental hazards and infectious diseases. For its part, the public also avails of analogical reasoning when it assesses a range of public health problems. In this article, some of these uses of analogical reasoning in public health are examined. Analogical arguments have courted approval and disapproval in roughly equal measure by a long succession of logicians and philosophers. The logical features of these arguments which make them simultaneously compelling and contemptible are considered. As a form of presumptive reasoning, analogical arguments have a valuable role to play in closing epistemic gaps in knowledge. This heuristic function of these arguments is illustrated through an examination of some uses of analogical reasoning in recent public health crises. Finally, the results of a study of analogical reasoning in 879 members of the public are reported. This study reveals that lay members of the public are able to discern the logical and epistemic conditions under which analogical arguments are rationally warranted in a public health context.
References (42)
Berkley, S. 1991. “Parenteral Transmission of HIV in Africa.” AIDS 5 (Suppl 1): S87–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummings, L. 2000. “Petitio Principii: The Case for Non-Fallaciousness.” Informal Logic 20 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Reasoning under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry.” Informal Logic 22 (2): 113–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Analogical Reasoning as a Tool of Epidemiological Investigation.” Argumentation 18 (4): 427–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Giving Science a Bad Name: Politically and Commercially Motivated Fallacies in BSE Inquiry.” Argumentation 19 (2): 123–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Emerging Infectious Diseases: Coping with Uncertainty.” Argumentation 23 (2): 171–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Rethinking the BSE Crisis: A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Considering Risk Assessment up Close: The Case of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy.” Health, Risk & Society 13 (3): 255–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. “The Public Health Scientist as Informal Logician.” International Journal of Public Health 57 (3): 649–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “The Contribution of Informal Logic to Public Health.” Perspectives in Public Health 132 (2): 66–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012c. “Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning.” Informal Logic 32 (1): 25–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Public Health Reasoning: Much More than Deduction.” Archives of Public Health 71 (1): 25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. “Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning.” Informal Logic 34 (1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “The ‘Trust’ Heuristic: Arguments from Authority in Public Health.” Health Communication 29 (10): 1043–1056. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014c. “Circles and Analogies in Public Health Reasoning.” Inquiry, to appear.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Grandis, Giovanni. 2011. “On the Analogy between Infectious Diseases and War: How to Use It and Not To Use It.” Public Health Ethics 4 (1): 70–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1981. “Fallacies and the Evaluation of Reasoning.” American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1): 13–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2008. “Why Heuristics Work.” Perspectives in Psychological Science 3 (1): 20–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Henry Brighton. 2009. “Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 107–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godden, David M., and Douglas Walton. 2007. “A Theory of Presumption for Everyday Argumentation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (2): 313–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guarini, Marcello, Amy Butchart, Paul Simard Smith, and Andrei Moldovan. 2009. “Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-Disciplinary Guide.” Informal Logic 29 (2): 84–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Bjørn, Jan Helge Solbakk, and Søren Holm. 2006. “Analogical Reasoning in Handling Emerging Technologies: The Case of Umbilical Cord Blood Biobanking.” The American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6): 49–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, Stephen, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2001. “Impact of BSE on Attitudes to GM Food.” Risk , Decision and Policy 6 (2): 91–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klahr, David. 2000. Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Makins, Marian (ed.). 1991. Collins English Dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1974. “A System of Logic Raciocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VIII1, ed. by J.M. Robson. Toronto and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muraskin, William. 1993. “Hepatitis B as a Model (and Anti-Model) for AIDS.” In AIDS and Contemporary History, ed. by Virginia Berridge, and Philip Strong, 108–132. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plant, Aileen J. 2008. “When Action Can’t Wait: Investigating Infectious Disease Outbreaks.” In Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Gabriele Bammer, and Michael Smithson, 45–54. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1977. Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todd, Peter M., and Gerd Gigerenzer. 2000. “Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 727–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waller, Bruce N. 2001. “Classifying and Analysing Analogies.” Informal Logic 21 (3): 199–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1985. “Are Circular Arguments Necessarily Vicious?” American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4): 263–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance.” American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4): 381–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are.” Informal Logic 30 (2): 159–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitelaw, Sandy. 2012. “The Emergence of a ‘Dose-Response’ Analogy in the Health Improvement Domain of Public Health: A Critical Review.” Critical Public Health 22 (4): 427–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Andrew W. 2006. “How Dangerous are Mobile Phones, Transmission Masts, and Electricity Pylons?” Archives of Diseases in Childhood 91 (4): 361–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, John. 1995. “Appeal to Force.” In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. by Hans V. Hansen, and Robert C. Pinto, 240–250. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zylberman, Patrick. 2010. “Comment: Influenza Epidemics and the Politics of Historical Analogy.” In Influenza and Public Health, ed. by Tamara Giles-Vernick, and Susan Craddock, 84–90. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Cummings, Louise
2015. The Challenge for Public Health. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Circular Argument. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Philosophy and Public Health. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2015. Argument from Analogy. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2020. Critical Thinking in Medicine and Health. In Fallacies in Medicine and Health, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2020. Arguments from Analogy. In Fallacies in Medicine and Health, ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Cummings, Louise
2024. Protecting the Public's Health during Novel Infectious Disease Outbreaks, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue