Article published In: Argumentation in the Media
Edited by Darrin Hicks
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1] 2014
► pp. 35–56
Yellow Rain
Radiolab and the acoustics of strategic maneuvering
Published online: 7 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.1.03eck
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.1.03eck
The critically acclaimed WNYC program Radiolab found itself embroiled in a controversy for its recent podcast segment “Yellow Rain.” The intent of the segment was to indict the Reagan administration’s dubious pretenses for labeling yellow rain a chemical weapon. But Radiolab’s interview with survivor and historian Eng Yang took a harsh turn and concluded with one of Radiolab’s hosts, Robert Krulwich calling Yang’s experience hearsay. This essay uses the “Yellow Rain” controversy to highlight two important features of argumentation in the podcast context. First, podcasts feature what I call ‘the acoustics of strategic maneuvering,’ which describes the way sound itself acts as presentational force in the service of a standpoint. Second, podcasts ephemerality enables Radiolab to revise their arguments to incorporate audience expectations.
Keywords: Radiolab, sound, digital media, revision, podcasts, strategic maneuvering
References (40)
Abumrad, Jad. 2012. “On Yellow Rain….”
Radiolab (blog). September. Accessed December 20, 2012. [URL].
Baker, Mathew. 2012. “Amateur Broadcasters Spread Message on Digital Podcast.” The News Tribune. July. Accessed August 12, 2012. [URL].
Collins, Bob. 2012. “Why the Radiolab Interview Went Wrong.”
Minnesota Public Radio News
. September. Accessed October 20, 2012. [URL].
Crawford, Kate. 2009. “Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media.”
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies
231: 525-35.
Cutter, Chris. 2010. “Plunderphonia.” In
Audio Culture: Reading in Modern Music
, ed. by Christoph Cox, and Daniel Warner, 138-156. New York: Continuum.
Dyson, Frances. 2009.
Sounding New Media: Immersion and Embodiment in the Arts and Culture
. Berkeley: University of California Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010.
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2001. “Managing Disagreement: Rhetorical Analysis within a Dialectical Framework.”
Argumentation & Advocacy
371: 15-157.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2004.
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
. London: Cambridge University Press.
Ehningher, Douglas. 1970. “Argument as Method: Its Nature, Its Limitations, and Its Uses.”
Speech Monographs
371: 101-10.
Flagg, Barbara. 2010. “Summative: Listeners’ Evaluation of Radiolab Program: Choice.”
Informal Science
. September. Accessed September 2012. [URL].
Foucault, Michel. 1994. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In
The Essential Foucault
, ed. by Paul Rabinow, and Nikolas Rose, 25-43. New York: The New Press.
Fricker, Miranda. 2008.
“Forum on Miranda Fricker’s Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing.” Theoria
611: 69-71.
George, William Lloyd. 2010. “The Secret Army Still Fighting the Vietnam War,”
The Independent
, 17 February. Accessed December 13, 2012. [URL].
Hamilton-Merritt, Jane. 1999.
Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942-1992
. Bloomington: Indiana Press.
Hicks, Darrin, and Justin Eckstein. 2012. “Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering by Shifting Standards of Reasonableness in Cold-War Editorial Argumentation.” In
Argumentation in Context
, ed. by Frans H. Van Eemeren, and Robert Grootendorst, 321-342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.
Kamboj, Kiriti. 2012. “Deliberate Distorations: ‘Radiolab’ and the Hmong Story,”
Hyphen
, 10 October. Accessed October 20, 2012. [URL].
Krulwich, Robert. 2012. “From Robert Krulwich on Yellow Rain,”
Radiolab (blog), 30 September. Accessed December 20, 2012. [URL].
Lapin, Andrew. 2012. “Search for ‘Truth’ Results in Radiolab Apology,”
Current Magazine
, 24 October. Accessed December 21, 2012. [URL].
LaVecchia, Olivia. 2012. “Behind Loas’s Yellow Rain and Tears,”
City Pages
, 14 November. Accessed December 13, 2012. [URL].
Lovink, Geert. 2010. “MyBrain.net: The Colonization of Real-Time and Other Trends in Web 2.0.”
Eurozine
. March. Accessed January 10, 2013. [URL].
Martin, Tom. 2012. “Marketing at the Speed of Sound,”
Converse Digital
, 20 December. Accessed May 5, 2012. [URL].
Mitchell, Gordon. 2010. “Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentation.”
Argumentation
241: 319-35.
Olmstead, Kenny, Amy Mitchell, and Tom Rosenstiel. 2011. “Audio: By the Numbers,”
The State of the News Media 2011
. Accessed September 5, 2012. [URL].
Olson, Kathryn M., and G. Thomas Goodnight. 1994. “Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy, and Fashion: The Social Controversy Over Fur.”
The Quarterly Journal of Speech
801: 249-76.
Salesses, Mathew. 2012. “Radiolab Update: Privilege in the Podcast, Hope in the Comments,” The Good Men Project, 25 October. Accessed December 18, 2012. [URL].
“The Facts of the matter,”
Radiolab
, 24 September. Accessed December 24, 2012. [URL].
Tucker, Jonathan B. 2001. “The ‘Yellow Rain’ Controversy: Lessons for Arms Control Compliance.”
The Nonproliferation Review
81: 25-42.
Walker, Rob. 2011. “On ‘Radiolab,’ the Sound of Science,”
The New York Times
, 7 April. Accessed December 18, 2012. [URL].
Weinberger, David. 2009. “Transparency is the New Objectivity.”
Journal of the Hyperlinked Organization
101. Accessed December 27, 2012. [URL].
Yang, Kao Kalia. 2012. “The Science of Racism: Radiolab’s Treatment of Hmong Experience,”
Hyphen
, 22 October. Accessed December 18, 2012. [URL].
“Yellow Rain,”
Radiolab (blog), 26 September (2:26pm). Accessed December 18, 2012. [URL].
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Lv, Junyi
2022. Crafting multimodal argumentative meshworks. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Vrikki, Photini & Sarita Malik
Eckstein, Justin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
