Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:3 (2022) ► pp.350–393

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Amplifying argument

The Flanders Field American Cemetery visitors center

 | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
 | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Published online: 23 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21024.bla
Abstract
In the aftermath of World War I, the US Government created eight cemeteries in France, Belgium, and the UK to honor American soldiers who died in Europe as well as to remind European audiences of that sacrifice. More recently, visitor centers were added to some of those sites. This essay explores how one of those visitor centers, located at Flanders Field American Cemetery in Belgium, serves to amplify the cemeteries’ public diplomacy argument. We argue that amplification, as described by classical and more contemporary theorists, serves an important function in argumentation, and that these centers themselves deserve greater attention as they provide direction to visitors in making the place matter. In this analysis, we also consider the recursive relationship between text/argument and context in site interpretation.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Flanders Field American Cemetery
  • US Visitor Centers and their interpretive missions
  • Amplifying (or attenuating) arguments: Divergent possibilities of site interpretation
  • A visit to the Visitor Center at Flanders Field American Cemetery
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Works Cited
References (60)
Works Cited
Allaback, Sarah. 2000. Mission 66 Visitors Centers: The History of a Building Type. Washington, DC: US Department of Interior.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
American Battle Monuments Commission. N.d. “Brookwood American Cemetery.” Retrieved from [URL]
. N.d. “Flanders Field American Cemetery.” Retrieved from [URL]
. 2017. “Flanders Field: Remembering Their Sacrifice.” Retrieved from [URL]
“Archibald MacLeish.” 2021. Poetry Foundation. Retrieved from [URL]
Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2d ed. trans. by George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ash, James. 2012. “Attention, Videogames and the Retentional Economies of Affective Amplification.” Theory, Culture, and Society 29.61: 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balthrop, V. William, and Carole Blair. 2018. “’Lafayette, We Are Here’: Why Did the U.S. Commemorate Its World War I Dead in Europe?” In Recovering Argument, ed. by Randall A. Lake, 3–15. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Attentuating Argument: The Meuse-Argonne American Cemetery Visitor Center.” Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon R. Mitchell, and Jean H. M. Wegemans, 63–71. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balzotti, Jonathan Mark, and Richard Benjamin Crosby. 2014. “Diocletian’s Victory Column: Megethos and the Rhetoric of Spectacular Disruption.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 44.41: 323–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergman, Teresa. 2013. Exhibiting Patriotism: Creating and Contesting Interpretations of American Historic Sites. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, Margi. 2006. “Tilden’s Children: Interpretation in Britain’s National Parks.” Heritage Interpretation, ed. by Alison Hems and Marion Brockley, 173–188. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[Cicero] ad C. Herennium. 1954. De Ratione Dicendi (Rhetorica as Herennium), trans. by Harry Caplan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, R. Bruce. 2007. “Introduction to the Fourth Edition.” Interpreting Our Heritage, by Freeman Tilden. 4th (50th Anniversary) expanded and updated edition, 1–21. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin. 2015. “’Flemish Friends, Let Us Separate!’: The Discursive Struggle for Flemish Nationalist Civil Society in the Media.” Javnost – The Public 22.11: 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faral, Edmond. 1924. Les Arts Poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe Siècle. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas B. 1998. “Sizing Things Up: Colloquial Reflection as Practical Wisdom.” Argumentation 12.11: 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “The Weight of Rhetoric: Studies in Cultural Delirium.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 41.41: 467–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Megan Irene. 2016. “Commemorative Privilege in National Statuary Hall: Spatial Constructions of Racial Citizenship.” Southern Communication Journal 81.41: 252–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finn, Tara. 9 Nov 2018. “The War That Did Not End at 11am on 11 November. GOV.UK Blog: History of Government. Retrieved from [URL]
Foucault, Michel. 1971. “The Discourse on Language,” trans. by Rupert Swyer, 215–237. Appendix to The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Freeman Tilden Award.” 2019. National Park Service. Retrieved from [URL]
Gallagher, Victoria J., Kelly Norris Martin, and Magdy Ma. 2011. “Visual Wellbeing: Intersections of Rhetorical Theory and Design.” Design Issues 27.21: 27–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goebel, Stefan. 2007. The Great War and Medieval Memory: War Remembrance and Medievalism in Britain and Germany, 1914–1940. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G. 2005. “Presence as Argument in the Public Sphere.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35.21: 5–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Michael, and Ron Zimmerman. 2002. Interpretation Centers: The History, Design, and Development of Nature and Visitor Centers. Stevens Point, WI: UW-SP Foundation Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
HALS/HABS No. US-7-A. N.d. [Historic American Landscape Survey/Historic American Buildings Survey]. Flanders Field American Cemetery & Memorial, Superintendent’s Quarters. Retrieved from the US Library of Congress. [URL]
Ham, Sam H. 2013. Interpretation: Making a Difference on Purpose. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haynal Allen, Kaitlyn. 2019. “Blurred Borderlands: Sustainability and the Urban/Nature Divide at the Frick Environmental Center.” Environmental Communication 13.81: 1009–1023. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawk, Bryon. 2018. “Sound: Resonance as Rhetorical.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48.31: 315–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Brenda. 2019. “Revisiting Missions: Decolonizing Public Memories in California.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 49.51: 470–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Hypotyposis.” Retrieved from Sylva Rhetoricae, n.d. [URL]
Ingraham, Chris. 2018. “Rhetoric’s Vitality.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48.31: 260–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karon, Louise A. 1976. “Presence in The New Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9.21: 96–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Verne R. 1968. “Amplification: A Central Theme in Late Medieval Rhetoric.” Central States Speech Journal 19.31: 214–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1971. “Auxesis: A Concept of Rhetorical Amplification.” Southern Speech Journal 37.11: 60–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, Jens. E. 2018. “The Rhetoric of Sound, the Sound of Arguments: Three Propositions, Three Questions, and an Afterthought for the Study of Sonic and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 54.41: 364–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Anders Olaf. 2019. “News Use as Amplification: Norwegian National, Regional, and Hyperpartisan Media Framing on Facebook.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 96.21: 721–741. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lechner, Joan Maríe. 1962. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces. New York: Pageant.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levere, Jane. 2018. “Paul P. Cret, Storied Philadelphia Architect, Highlighted in Athenaeum Museum Show.” The Architect’s Newspaper, 30 August 2018. Retrieved from [URL]
Marks, Katrina. 2018. “Colonizing Sacred Ground: Adjacent Secular and Religious Sacredness at Christ Church Cathedral/Former Slave Market Site.” Paper presented at the conference of the Religious Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT, 7 November 2018.
Murphy, John M. 1994. “Presence, Analogy, and Earth in the Balance.” Argumentation and Advocacy 31.11: 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nugent, Ciara. 2018. “How Poppies Became a Symbol of Remembrance After World War I.” Time 8 Nov 2018. Retrieved from [URL]
Olson, Crista J. 2018. “American Magnitude: Frederic Church, Hiram Bingham, and Hemispheric Vision.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48.41: 340–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. by John Wilkinsoon and Purce Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pezzullo, Phaedra C., and Catalina M. de Onís. 2018. “Rethinking Field Methods on a Precarious Planet.” Communication Monographs 85.11: 103–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian. 2009. “A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.” Argumentation 231: 325–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahman, Rema. 2011. “Who, What, Why: Which Countries Wear Poppies?” BBC News 9 Nov. 2011. Retrieved from [URL]
Ripp, Mathias. 2016. “Visitor Centres vs. Museums.” GoUNESCO. 31 Jan. 2016. Retrieved from [URL]
Ruzich, Connie. 2020. “A Belgian Letter.” Behind Their Lines: Poetry of the Great War. 19 Dec. 2020. Retrieved from [URL]
Rybczynski, Witold. 2014. “The Late, Great Paul Cret.” The New York Times Style Magazine. 21 Oct. 2014. Retrieved from [URL]
Sims, Christopher, and Patrick Lernout. 2017. The Soldiers of the Flanders Field American Military Cemetery. Belgium: Christopher Sims – Patrick Lernout.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tilden, Freeman. 2007. Interpreting Our Heritage. 4th (50th anniversary) expanded and updated edition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
US Army Center of Military History. Fall 2021. “World War I: Birth of the Modern Army Division.” Army History Magazine. Retrieved from [URL]
Walser, Lauren. 8 Feb 2017. “How Mission 66 Shaped the Vistor Experience at National Parks.” National Trust for Historic Preservation. Retrieved from [URL]
Westin, Monica. 2017. “Aristotle’s Rhetorical Energeia: An Extended Note.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric 20.31: 252–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winderman, Emily. 2019. “Anger’s Volumes: Rhetorics of Amplification and Aggregation in #MeToo.” Women’s Studies in Communication 42.31: 327–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yockelson, Mitchell A. 2016. Borrowed Soldiers: American Soldiers Under British Command, 1918. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Yini, Chris Wells, Song Want, and Karl Rohe. 2018. “Attention and Amplification in the Hybrid Media System: The Composition and Activity of Donald Trump’s Following During the 2016 Election.” New Media and Society 20.91: 3161–3182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue