Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:2 (2022) ► pp.243–277

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing

 | University of Hradec Králové
Published online: 6 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21014.sva
Abstract
This paper is focused on the practice of private diary-writing as an act of externalizing internal communication from the point of view of the theory of argumentation. It is demonstrated that through diary-writing, various forms of internal negotiation can be implemented. The paper sheds light on three ways internal negotiation is externalized through diary writing: reflective diary writing, crisis diary writing and self-encouraging diary writing. It is shown that these communicative practices occur with respect to specific exigencies of a diarist, and with respect to these specific exigencies, they differ in the type of argumentation that can be submitted in the writings. For the argumentative characterization of these practices, the concept of the communicative activity type introduced within a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation is used. It is shown that distinguished diary-writing practices are differently conventionalized activity types that are preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Pragma-dialectical approach applied to reconstruction of argumentative discourse
  • 2.Argumentation in internal communication
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Limits of data access
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data treatment
    • 3.4Illustrations
  • 4.Personal diary-writing as a blend of diverse internal communicative activity types
    • 4.1Procedural and material starting points of diary-writing
    • 4.2Outcome of the discussion in diary-writing
  • 5.Three modes of diary-writing argumentatively characterized
    • 5.1Reflective diary-writing
      • 5.1.1Initial situation
      • 5.1.2Argumentative means and criticism
    • 5.2Crisis diary-writing
      • 5.2.1Initial situation
      • 5.2.2Argumentative means and criticism
    • 5.3Self-encouraging diary-writing
      • 5.3.1Initial situation
      • 5.3.2Argumentative means and criticism
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Works cited
References (68)
Works cited
Accardo, C. M., D. C. Aboyoun, B. A. Alford, and J. T. Cannon. 1996. “Diaries: Who Keeps Them and Why.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 82 (2): 559–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alaszewski, Andy. 2006. Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Athena, Eugenia Rozou, and Mary Vakondiou. 2020. “Voices of hope and despair: A narrative-dialogical inquiry into the diaries, letters, and suicide notes of Virginia Woolf.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 33 (4): 367–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkins, Sue, and Kathy Murphy. 1993. “Reflection: a review of the literature.” Journal of advanced nursing 18 (8): 1188–1192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aveling, Emma-Louise, Alex Gillespie, and Flora Cornish. 2015. “A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness.” Qualitative Research 15 (6): 670–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 2006 [1935]. The dialogic imagination: four essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baud, David. 2001. “Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice.” New directions for adult and continuing education (901): 9–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumtrog, Michael D. 2018. “Reasoning and arguing, dialectically and dialogically, among individual and multiple participants.” Argumentation 32 (1): 77–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, Evelyne M., and Ann W. Fales. 1983. “Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience.” Journal of humanistic psychology 23 (2) 99–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Christopher D. B. 1994. “An analysis of a self-initiated coping behavior: Diary-keeping.” Child Study Journal 24 (3): 171–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowther, Barbara. 1999. “Writing as performance: young girls’ diaries.” In Making meaning of narratives, ed. by Ruthellen Josselson and Amia Lieblich, 197–221. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culley, Margo. 1985. A day at a time: the diary literature of American women from 1764 to the present. The Feminist Press at CUNY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 2005. “Debating with myself and debating with others.” In Controversies and subjectivity, ed. by Pierluigi Barrotta and Marcelo Dascal, 31–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijck, José. 2004. “Composing the self: of diaries and lifelogs.” The Fibreculture Journal 31. Available at [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021.
2016. “Identifying argumentative patterns: a vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 30 (1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans. H. 2017. “Strategic manouevring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation.” In Contextualizing pragma-dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng, 123–144. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Strategic maneuvering: a synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation 20 (4): 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2017. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation (Second Edition). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative indicators: a pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1989. “Introduction.” In A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term, Bronisław Malinowski, xi–xix. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fothergill, Robert A. 1974. Private Chronicles: A Study of English Diaries. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. “One day at a time: the diary as lifewriting.” A/B: Auto/Biography Studies 10 (1): 81–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Miriam. 2004. The text is myself: women’s life writing and catastrophe. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geheran, Michael J. 2011. “I am fighting the hardest battle for my Germanness now”: internal dialogues of Victor Klemperer. Psychology & Society 4 (2): 21–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, Sara. 2017. “Using argumentative tools to understand inner dialogue.” Argumentation 31 (2): 331–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hackfort, Dieter, and Peter Schwenkmezger. 1993. “Anxiety.” In Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, ed. by Robert N. Singer, Milledge Murphy and L. Keith Tennant, 328–364. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, James. 2006. “Speaking clearly: A critical review of the self-talk literature.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 7 (1): 81–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, James, Kimberley Gammage, and Craig Hall. 2001. “A Descriptive Study of Athlete Self-Talk.” The Sport Psychologist 15 (3): 306–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, Lew, Graham Jones, and Daniel Goud. 1996. Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice. Chichester: Jones Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, Kimberly. 2003. “Rhetorical Rehearsals: The Construction of Ethos in Confederate Women’s Civil War Diaries.” Rhetoric Review 22 (3): 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M. 1996. “Voicing the self: from information processing to dialogical interchange.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (1): 31–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. “The dialogical self: toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning.” Culture & Psychology 7 (3): 243–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “The dialogical self as a society of mind: introduction.” Theory & Psychology 12 (2): 247–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 16 (2): 89–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Society in the Self. A Theory of Identity in Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M., and Agnieszka Hermans-Konopka. 2010. Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubbs, Delaura L., and Charles F. Brand. 2005. “The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling.” Journal of Experiential Education, 28 (1): 60–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyers, Lauri L. 2018. Diary Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lejeune, Phillippe. 2009. On diary, ed. by Jeremy D. Popkin and Julie Rak. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marty, Eric. 1985. L’ecriture du jour. Le journal d’André Gide. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFerran, Shannon, and Daniel G. Scott. 2013. The girls’ diary project: writing ourselves into being. Victoria: University of Victoria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Dina. 2009. The negotiational self: identifying and transforming negotiation outcomes within the self, unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
. 2012. “Voicing inner conflict: From a dialogical to a negotiational self.” In Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, ed. by Hubert J. M. Hermans and Thorsten Gieser, 284–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Becoming the Leader of Your Decisions.” In Assessing and Stimulating a Dialogical Self in Groups, Teams, Cultures, and Organizations, ed. by Hubert J. M. Hermans, 1–17. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Raalte, Judy L. and Andrew Vincent. 2017. “Self-Talk and Performance.” Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Available at: [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021.
Rainer, Tristine. 1980. The New Diary. How to Use a Journal for Self-Guidance and Expanded Creativity. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rottenberg-Rosler, Biri, Shifra Schonmann, and Emanuel Berman. 2009. “Dear Diary: Catharsis and Narratives of Aloneness in Adolescents’ Diaries.” Enquire 2 (1): 133–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sederberg, Kathryn. 2017. “Writing through crisis: time, history, futurity in German diaries of the second world war.” Biography 40 (2): 323–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinats, Petra, Daniel G. Scott, Shannon McFerran, Madelaine Hittos, Carys Cragg, Theresa Leblanc, and Daniela Brooks. 2005a. “Writing ourselves into being: writing as spiritual self-care for adolescent girls. Part one.” International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 10 (1): 17–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Writing ourselves into being: writing as spiritual self-care for adolescent girls. Part two.” International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 10 (3): 263–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinitz, Rebecca. 1997. “Writing diaries, reading diaries: The mechanics of memory.” Communication Review 2 (1): 43–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svačinová, Iva. 2021. “Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type.” Argumentation 35 (2): 237–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theodorakis, Yannis, Robert Weinberg, Petros Natsis, Irina Douma, and Panagiotis Kazakas. 2000. “The Effects of Motivational Versus Instructional Self-Talk on Improving Motor Performance.” The Sport Psychologist 14 (3): 253–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1987 [1934]. Thought and language, ed. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J., and Gijsbert Rutten. 2013. “Ego-documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective.” In Touching the past: studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, ed. by Marijke J. van der Wal and Gijsbert Rutten, 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zammuner, Vanda L. 2001. “Diary kinds and functions, and adolescents’ motives for keeping a diary.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies (ISQOLS), ed. by Ferran Casas and Carme Saurina, 453–474. Girona: Universidad de Girona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zampa, Marta. 2014. “Arguing with oneself in writing for the news.” In 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) conference. Available at [URL]. Accessed 3 June 2021.
Zampa, Marta, and Daniel Perrin. 2016. “Arguing with oneself.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1): 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zittoun, Tania. 2007. “Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions.” Young 15 (2): 193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Three dimensions of dialogical movement.” New Ideas in Psychology 321: 99–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zittoun, Tania, and Alex Gillespie. 2012. “Using diaries and self-writings as data in psychological research.” In Emerging methods in psychology, ed. by Emily Abbey and Seth Surgan, 1–26. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue