Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 11:2 (2022) ► pp.157–179

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

(De-)constructing New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern’s initiative to wear the hijab after the Christchurch terrorist attack

Critical perspectives on newspapers’ discourse and argumentation

 | The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
 | University of Liverpool
Published online: 6 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21006.sal
Abstract
This paper examines the discursive construction of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern after she wore a veil following the unprecedented terror attack in two mosques in the city of Christchurch in 2019. The articles analyzed are collected from three main newspapers published in New Zealand’s three main cities. Analyzed using principles and tools from Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) and Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) more specifically, the articles reveal key arguments from both sides i.e. in support of and against this unparalleled initiative on behalf of a political leader in the western world. On the one hand, the majority of the news articles under analysis portray PM’s initiative as one that attempts to mitigate tension and conflict while bringing solidarity to a grief-stricken nation; and thus, are based on the ‘locus from ontological implications’. While the perspectives that oppose the initiative vary from explicit racist ones that present Muslims as threat to Zealand, to those who strongly believe such actions support the women oppression. Through a (de-)construction of the arguments opposing this move, the findings demonstrate that the opposition towards PM’s initiative is based on two main loci namely the ‘locus from correlates’ and the ‘locus from termination and setting up’
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Perceptions and representations of the Hijab
  • 3.CDS and argumentation
    • 3.1From DHA to AMT: Studying argumentative inferences in media discourse
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Data analysis
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Amossy, R. 2009a. The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation, 231, 313–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009b. Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic, 29 (3), 252–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ash, E., Tuffin, K., Kahu, E. 2019. Representing Islam: Experiences of Women Wearing Hijab in New Zealand. New Zealand Psychology Society 48 (1):114–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, and T. McEnery. 2013. Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bevelander, P. & Wodak, R. (Eds.). 2019. Europe at the crossroads: Confronting populist, nationalist, and global challenges. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boukala, S. 2016. Rethinking topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies 18 (3): 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. European identity and the representation of Islam in the mainstream press: Argumentation and media discourse. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bullock, K. H., and Jafri, G. J. 2000. Media (mis) representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation. Canadian Woman Studies 20(2): 35–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candlin, C. (1997). General editor’s preface. In B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. x–xiv). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fournier, P. 2013. Headscarf and burqa controversies at the crossroad of politics, society and law. Social Identities 19(6): 689–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, S. 2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case-study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies 14(2): 197–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, S. & Morasso, C. 2014. “Argumentation from expert opinion in science journalism: The case of Eureka’s Fight Club.” In Rhétorique et Cognition eds. by Oswald & T. Herman, 185–213, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, T. & Serafis, D. 2019. Emotions, argumentation and argumentativity: Insights from an analysis of newspapers headlines in the context of the Greek crisis. Informal Logic, 39(4): 373–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihnen, C. & Richardson, J. E. 2011. On combining pragma-dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis. In Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren ed. by E. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabir, S. N., & Bourk, M. 2012. Representing Islam and Muslims in New Zealand Newspapers. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 32(3): 324–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montali, L., P. Riva, A. Frigerio & S. Mele. 2013. The representation of migrants in the Italian press: A study on the Corriere della Sera (1992–2009). Journal of Language and Politics 12 (2): 226–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. 2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (1): 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rane, H., Ewart, J., & Martinkus, J. 2014. Media Framing of the Muslim world: Conflicts, Crises and Contexts. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. 2014. “Argumentation analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A methodological framework”. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by C. Hart and P. Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. By R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 2nd ed. 87–121. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rheindorf, M. & Wodak, R. 2018. Borders, fences, and limits – Protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the current refugee crisis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E. & Greco, S. 2019. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruby, T. F. (2006, January). Listening to the voices of hijab. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 54–66). Pergamon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Said, E. W. 1979. Orientalism. Vintage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salahshour, N. & Salahshour, F. 2012. Representation of the East in Western Literature (A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Travelogue Eothen). Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 3(2): 531–541.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salahshour, N., & Boamah, E. 2020. Perceived Discrimination as Experienced by Muslims in New Zealand Universities. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(3): 497–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salahshour, N. 2020. A Critique of New Zealand’s Exclusive Approach to Intercultural Education. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, J. W. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. & Jermini-Martinez Soria, C. 2020a. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: Evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(5): 545–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020b. Multimodal Arguments in the Mainstream Press: Illustrating Portrayals of Migration. In: Cook, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12. Ontario: University of Windsor. Available at: [URL] (accessed 31.05.2021) ‘Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity’: Proceedings of the OSSA12 Conference. Available at: [URL]
Serafis, D., Raimondo, C., Assimakopoulos, S., Greco, S. & Rocci, A. 2021. Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’. Discourse & Communication, 15 (5): 559–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todorov, T. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle (Theory & History of Literature. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. Α. 2008. Discourse and Power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. 2001. “The discourse historical approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by R. Wodak & M. Meyer, 63–95. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žagar, I. 2010. Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6(1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zampa, M. 2017. Argumentation in the Newsroom. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rasoulikolamaki, Sahar, Surinderpal Kaur & Neda Salahshour
2024. A multimodal analysis of (de)legitimation through argumentation in extremist discourse: The case of Dabiq . Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Authoritarianism on the Front Page [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 99], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue