Article published In: Argumentative Style
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1] 2021
► pp. 26–45
The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Published online: 4 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen
Abstract
According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” ( (2019). Argumentative style: A complex notion. Argumentation 33(2), 153–171. : 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own
argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a
broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons
in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,
distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese
spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational
maneuvering by being at the same time detached.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Confrontational style as argumentative style
- 3.The uncompromising confrontational style manifested in the spokespersons’ argumentative moves
- 3.1Argumentative moves aimed at silencing the other party
- 3.2Argumentative moves aimed at distracting the other party
- 3.3Argumentative moves aimed at pressuring the other party
- 4.Maneuvering strategically with an uncompromising confrontational style
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (6)
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2021). Examining argumentative style: A new theoretical perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context. 10(1). This issue.
Wu, P. (2017). Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences: A pragma-dialectical study of the press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6(3), 285–314.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Li, Tao & Feng Pan
Wu, Peng & Tian-bao Zhou
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
