Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp.418–423
Book review
. The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.18
Reviewed by
Published online: 14 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20016.gre
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20016.gre
References (14)
Andone, C. 2013. Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Eemeren, F. H. van. 2010. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2017. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 7–29). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Garssen, B. 2017. The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 31–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Garzone, G. 2000. Textual analysis and interpreting research. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 101, 69–88.
Garzone, G., & Santulli, F. 2004. What can corpus linguistics do for critical discourse analysis? In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. Collection Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication (pp. 351–368). Bern: Peter Lang.
Marzocchi, C. 1994. Interpretazione e argomentazione: alcune note preliminari per l’analisi dell’argomentazione nel discorso politico. In R. D. Snel Trampus (Ed.), Studi di neerlandistica. Traduzione, interpretazione, lingua (pp. 63–72). Trieste: LINT.
1997. The analysis of argumentation and its relevance to interpretation research and theory. In K. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre Necesse Est. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting, 5–7 September, 1996, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 179–185). Budapest: Scholastica.
Mohammed, D. 2018. Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Accusations of inconsistency in response to criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.
Salvato, L. 2019. The translator’s visibility. Translators’ critical argumentation on their translating effort. In Garrsen, B., et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1022–1033). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Williams, M. 2004. Translation quality assessment: An argumentation-centred approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Zarefsky, D. 2014. Political argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.