Cover not available

Article published In: Argumentative Style
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1] 2021
► pp. 97–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style

Integrating linguistic-stylistic analysis systematically into the analysis of argumentative style

 | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL)
 | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL)
Published online: 4 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa
Abstract
Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of argumentative style.
In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the argumentative strategies involved.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Argumentative strategies and linguistic choices
  • 3.The linguistic-stylistic approach and its integration with pragma-dialectics
  • 4.An illustration: The Yuri case
    • 4.1The case
    • 4.2Identifying argumentative strategies
    • 4.3Linguistic-stylistic analysis
    • 4.4Results of the linguistic-stylistic analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (16)
References
Burgers, C. & de Graaf, A. (2013). Language intensity as a sensationalistic news feature: the influence of style on sensationalism perceptions and effects. Communications 381: 167–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. (2009). Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. In Examining Argumentation in Context. Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. F. H. van Eemeren (pp. 191–220). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. & Y. Tonnard. (2011). Amplification in strategic maneuvering. In Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics, eds. E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (pp. 103–116). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Second edition. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Argumentative style: a complex notion. Argumentation 331: 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
This issue. Examining Argumentative Style: A New Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 11: 479–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (2nd rev. ed.) New York/London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Haaften, T. (2019). Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic, 391, 301–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Haaften, T. & van Leeuwen, M. (2018). Strategic Maneuvering with Presentational Devices: A Systematic Approach. In Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Volume II. Studies in Logic 76, eds. S. Oswald & D. Maillat (pp. 873–886). London: College Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, M. (2014). Systematic stylistic analysis. The use of a checklist. In From Text to Political Positions. Text analysis across disciplines, eds. B. Kaal, I. Maks & A. van Elfrinkhof (pp. 225–244). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Stijl en politiek. Een taalkundig-stilistische benadering van Nederlandse parlementaire toespraken. [Style and politics. A linguistic-stylistic approach to Dutch parliamentary speeches] Dissertation Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stukker, N. & A. Verhagen. (2019). Stijl, taal en tekst: stilistiek op taalkundige basis. [Style, language and text: stylistics on a linguistic foundation.] Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Brambilla, Emanuele
2024. Argumentative style in international adoption dossiers. In Persuasion in Specialized Discourse [Argumentation in Context, 22], ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans & Bart Garssen
2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Argumentative Style [Argumentation in Context, 20], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue